Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T12:37:36.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developing the Ethics Component of the UK Modular Training System for Laboratory Animal Scientists: A Lasa Workshop Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M Jennings*
Affiliation:
Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Causeway, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1HG, UK
P Hawkins
Affiliation:
Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Causeway, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1HG, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints

Abstract

This paper presents the report of a LASA workshop on developing the ethics component of the UK modular training system for laboratory animal scientists. The objectives were: (i) to define and agree the goals of ethics training; ii) to set out means of achieving these goals in terms of an appropriate syllabus, effective approaches to training, and the resources necessary; (iii) to define the audience - who should be trained and to what level; and iv) to consider the practicalities and means of assessment of prospective licensees. Although the focus was on the UK system, the issues are similar wherever ethics is taught in the laboratory animal context.

A keynote paper introduced the subjects for discussion and four course organizers then provided examples of current practice. Syndicate group sessions addressed questions in relation to the goals enumerated above. This report represents a summary of the papers, syndicate group discussions and conclusions of the workshop.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Edited by M Jennings and P Hawkins on behalf of the LASA Ethics and Project Licence Training Group:

B Howard, University of Sheffield, Field Laboratories, c/o The Medical School, Beech Hill Rd, Sheffield S10 2RX

M Jennings, Research Animals Department, RSPCA, Causeway, Horsham, West Sussex RH 12 1HG

M Matjield, Research Defence Society, 58 Great Marlborough St, London, W1V 1DD

G Moore, Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, Kent CT13 9NJ

B Waynforth, SmithKline Beecham, LAS Department, NFSP-North, Third Ave, Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW

References

Boyd, K M 1987 Report of a Working Party on the Teaching of Medical Ethics. IME Publications Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Dennet, D C 1995 Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Penguin: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Home Office 1986 Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Home Office 1992 Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1992. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Koocher, G P 1997 Ethics and behaviour. In.· Ethical Issues in the Use of Animals in Research (Special issue). Ethics and Behaviour 7(2):89-192Google Scholar
LASA 1994 Report of the LASA Workshop ‘The Ethical Review Process ‘. (Special edition). Laboratory Animal Science Association: Tamworth, UKGoogle Scholar
Russell, W M S and Burch, R L 1959 The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Meuthen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, J A and Boyd, KM 1991 Lives in the Balance: The Ethics of Using Animals in Biomedical Research. The Report of a Working Party of the Institute of Medical Ethics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, J A and Jennings, M 1998 Ethics training for laboratory animal users. Laboratory Animals 32: 128136Google ScholarPubMed