Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T08:22:59.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Usefulness of some components of the lactation curve for selection in Murrah buffaloes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. S. Cheema
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal — 132001, India
S. B. Basu
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal — 132001, India
Get access

Abstract

The study was based on 1156 lactation records of 545 Murrah buffaloes. Initial milk yield, peak yield, ascending phase milk yield and days to attain peak daily production, the means of which were 26·7 kg, 10·3 kg, 407 kg and 58·9 days respectively, were all affected by period, season and parity of calving. Heifers recorded the least initial milk yield and peak yield and took the longest time to reach peak production. Peak yield was the most important single factor (R2 = 0·41) in causing variation in 43-week milk yield. The heritability estimates for initial, peak and ascending phase milk yields and days to attain peak yield were 0·35, 0·51, 0·27 and 0·13 respectively, whilst that for 43-week milk yield was 0·18. Peak yield had the highest phenotypic (rP = 0·64) and genetic correlations (ra = 0·68 ± 0·19) with the 43-week milk yield. Other genetic correlations with the 43-week milk yield were low and non-significant. The results indicated that indirect selection for peak yield would be more effective than direct selection for improving the 43-week milk yield in buffaloes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basu, S. B. and Ghai, A. S. 1978. Studies on milk production in Murrah buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 48: 593596.Google Scholar
Dave, B. K. and Taylor, C. M. 1971. Some observations on the peak yield of Indian water buffaloes. Indian vet. J. 48: 246252.Google Scholar
Dhinsa, H. S. 1963. Influence of some economic characters in Murrah buffaloes. Indian vet. J. 40: 352361.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Dutt, M, Singh, S. P. and Desai, R. N. 1965. Production equations for milk yield in Murrah buffaloes. Indian vet. J. 42: 506512.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1960. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal sub-class numbers. Agric Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Bhat, P. N. and Garg, R. C. 1978. Inheritance of various segments of lactation curve in Indian buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 48: 652655.Google Scholar
Kushwaha, G. S., Basu, S. B. and Sengar, O. P. S. 1972. Inheritance of part lactations in Murrah buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 42: 751753.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, P. 1960. Some genetic parameters of the water buffalo. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28: 99103.Google Scholar
Maymone, B. and Malossini, F. 1962. Lactation curve in water buffalo cows. Z. Tierzucht. ZiichtBiol. 77: 316334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, T. P., Singh, B. P. and Dutt, M. 1970. Studies on lactation curves and association of certain production traits in Murrah buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 40: 246251.Google Scholar
Sane, D. D., Khanna, R. S., Bajpai, L. D. and Bhat, P. N. 1972. Studies on Murrah buffalo. II. Genetic analysis of milk yield and peak yield. Indian J. Anim. Prod. 3: 6166.Google Scholar
Singh, S. B. and Desai, R. N. 1962. Production characters of Bhadawari buffaloes. Indian vet. J. 39: 332343.Google Scholar
Tomar, S. P. S. and Desai, R. N. 1967. Inheritance and genetic correlations of peak yield with milk production and lactation period in buffaloes on Military farms. Indian vet. J. 44: 308315.Google ScholarPubMed