Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T02:14:59.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Superovulation and fertility in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. H. F. Hunter
R. H. F. Hunter
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Reproductive Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Cambridge†
Get access

Extract

1. The effects of gonadotrophins administered during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle were studied in forty gilts; these were purebred Large White or Large White crosses weighing from 200-275 lb.

2. Superovulation was induced by a subcutaneous injection of PMS; half of the animals received in addition an intramuscular injection of LH.

3. All animals which received gonadotrophins exhibited normal oestrous behaviour and only four of the gilts failed to come into oestrus by Day 21 of the cycle.

4. A relationship has been established between the PMS dose and the mean ovarian response.

5. An injection of LH was not essential for ovulation after treatment with PMS. Similarly, it had no significant effect on ovarian response.

6. Egg recovery was 75% in the group of animals that exhibited fertility. Of these eggs, 93% were fertilised and undergoing cleavage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1964 , pp. 189 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Casida, L. E., 1935. Prepuberal development of the pig ovary and its relation to stimula-ation with gonadotropic hormones. Anat. Rec., 61: 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, D. F., 1949. Problems of the transplantation of fertilised ova. J. agric. Sci., 39: 374.Google Scholar
Dziuk, P. J., 1958. Dilution and storage of boar semen. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 548.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Suoie, T. & Gordon, I., 1963. Superovulation and related phenomena in the beef cow. I. Superovulatory responses following PMS and HCG injections. J. Reprod. Fertil., 5: 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, J. Jr & Bhattacharya, P., 1944. Control of ovulation in the cow. J. agric. Sci., 34: 1.Google Scholar
Du Mesnil du Buisson, F., 1954. Possibility d'ovulation et de fécondation chez la truie avant la puberté. Ann. Endocr. (Paris), 15: 333.Google Scholar
Perry, J. S. & Rowlands, I. W., 1962. Early pregnancy in the pig. J. Reprod. Fertil., 4: 175.Google Scholar
Polge, C., 1956. Artificial insemination in pigs. Vet. Rec., 68: 62.Google Scholar
Tanabe, T. Y., Warnick, A. C., Casida, L. E. & Grummer, R. H., 1949. The effects of gonadotrophins administered to sows and gilts during different stages of the oestrual cycle. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 550.Google Scholar
Willett, E. L., 1953. Egg transfer and superovulation in farm animals. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci., 28: 83.Google Scholar