Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T08:25:51.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of retail requirements and genetic parameters of carcass quality in polled dorset horn sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. C. Bowman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Reading
C. R. C. Hendy
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Reading
Get access

Summary

Data on growth rate and carcasses of pedigree Polled Dorset Horn castrated male lambs have been collected. The lambs were the half-sib progeny of 18 rams mated to groups of 20 ewes in 1968 and 1969. The lambs were slaughtered at between 35 and 45 kg live weight and when considered ‘fit’ on the basis of a handling appraisal. The whole carcasses were classified by a retail organization as either ‘accepted’ or ‘rejected’ and subsequently all carcasses were cut into commercial joints ready for sale. Analyses indicated that classification of carcasses was largely but not solely based on backfat thickness. Accepted carcasses were from older and heavier lambs which had larger eye-muscle areas. There was no difference in value per unit weight between accepted and rejected carcasses.

Heritability for growth rate to 16 weeks of age was zero but for growth rate and age at slaughter was 0·26 ± 0·22 and 0·28 + μ 0·22 respectively. The heritability estimates for percentage best end, loin and backfat thickness were greater than 0·30. There were insufficient data to estimate genetic correlations accurately, but the estimates of pheno-typic correlations and heritabilities were very similar to those obtained in a previous study of carcasses of Down cross lambs.

It is suggested that the method of choosing lambs for slaughter accounts for the large difference in the heritabilities for growth to 16 weeks and to slaughter. Selection to change backfat thickness would be effective and would probably result in a reduction in age at slaughter and an increase in growth rate to slaughter. Selection to change proportions of the carcass is not considered to be worthwhile.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, W. A. 1964. Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics. Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P., Field, R. A., Riley, M. L., Nolan, J. C. Jr, and Roehrkasse, G. P. 1969. Heritability of carcass traits in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 29: 251255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, J. C. and Broadbent, J. S. 1966. Genetic parameters of growth between birth and 16 weeks in Down cross sheep. Anim. Prod. 8: 129135.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. G, Marshall, J. E. and Broadbent, J. S. 1968. Genetic parameters of carcass quality in Down cross sheep. Anim. Prod. 10: 183191.Google Scholar
Munson, A. W. 1967. Association of various measurements with lamb carcass composition and preliminary estimates of some genetic parameters. Diss. Abstr. B. 27: 4194–B.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H., Kemp, J. D., Moody, W. G. and Cundiff, L. V. 1968. Heritability estimates of some lamb carcass traits. Prog. Rep. Ky agric. Exp. Stn, No. 176: 2425.Google Scholar
Swiger, L. A., Harvey, W. R., Everson, D. O. and Gregory, K. E. 1964. The variance of the intraclass correlation involving groups with one observation. Biometrics 20: 818826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar