Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T18:24:40.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of body weight from birth to 1 year of age in European-zebu crossbred cattle in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. Kebede  and
E. S. E. Galal
B. Kebede
Affiliation:
>Institute of Agricultural Research, PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
E. S. E. Galal
Affiliation:
>Institute of Agricultural Research, PO Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

Body weights at birth, 90 days, 180 days and 1 year of age were analysed in 620 calves, the offspring of sires of the Friesian, Jersey and Simmental breeds, and of dams of three indigenous zebu breeds, namely Barka, Boran and Horro, at four diverse locations in Ethiopia.

Breed of sire, breed of dam and location all significantly affected weight. Progeny of Friesian and Simmental sires were similar in weight but both were heavier than the progeny of Jersey sires, their weight being, respectively, 25·0,24·9 and 21·2 kg at birth; 88·0, 84·6 and 74·9 kg at 90 days; 151·7, 150·6 and 135·4 kg at weaning at 180 days; and 220·6,224·8 and 193·3 kg at 365 days. Barka crosses were heaviest and Horro lightest. Mean weight for progeny from Barka, Boran and Horro dams was, respectively, 24·0, 24·6 and 22·5 kg at birth; 85·2, 83·8 and 78·5 kg at 90 days; 149·6, 148·0 and 140·1 kg at 180 days; and 233·7, 208·1 and 196/9 kg at 365 days. Dam breed × location interaction was significant except at birth, and sire breed × dam breed and sire breed × location interaction were significant at 90 days of age. In a comparison of Friesian and Simmental, the Friesian sires interacted relatively more favourably with the Barka dams, and the Simmental with the Boran. The Jersey was also relatively better with the Boran crosses, compared with either the Barka or the Horro crosses. By 1 year of age Jersey crosses were at a relative (but insignificant) advantage in body weight at the hottest location.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 85 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butts, W. T., Koger, M., Pahnish, O. F., Burns, W. C. and Warwick, E. J. 1971. Performance of two lines of Hereford cattle in two environments. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 923–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creek, M. J., Destro, D., Miles, D. G., Redfern, D. M., Robb, J., Schleicher, E. W. and Squire, H. A. 1973. A case study in the transfer of technology: the UNDP/FAO feedlot project in Kenya. In 3rd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., Pre Conf. Vol. 2, Presented Pap. — Themes 1 & 3, 3(a), pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Cundiff, L. V., Willham, R. L. and Pratt, C. A. 1966. Effects of certain factors and their two-way interactions on weaning weight in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 972–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaccaro, Lucia P. 1975. Some aspects of the performance of European purebred and crossbred dairy cattle in the tropics. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 43: 493–505.Google Scholar
Drewry, K. J., Becker, S. P., Martin, T. G. and Nelson, L. A. 1978. Crossing Angus and Milking Shorthorn cattle: calf performance to weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Cundiff, L. V., Smith, G. M., Laster, D. B. and Fitzhugh, H. A. JR., 1978. Characterization of biological types of cattle—cycle II: I. Birth and weaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 1022–1030.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Swiger, L. A., Koch, R. M., Sumption, L. J., Rowden, W. W. and Ingalls, J. E. 1965. Heterosis in preweaning traits of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Agricultural Research. 1972. Prog. Rep. for the Period April 1971–March 1972, pp. 153; 169. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Institute of Agricultural Research. 1976. Results of experiments in animal production (1966/67 to 1975). Anim. Prod. Rep. No 1. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Jilek, A. F., Burns, W. C., Roger, M. and Butts, W. T. 1968. Sire by breed of dam interaction in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 1127 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Long, C. R. and Gregory, K. E. 1974. Heterosis and breed effects in preweaning traits of Angus, Hereford and reciprocal cross calves. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, T. J., Wilson, L. L., Ziegler, J. H. and Sink, J. D. 1976. Growth rate, carcass quality and fat, lean and bone distribution of British- and Continental-sired crossbred steers, J. Anim. Sci. 42: 324–331.Google Scholar
Meyer-hoeffer, D. C. 1971. A study of cross-breeding and inter se mating of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Tenn.Google Scholar
Plasse, D., Mueller-haye, B., Gil, R., Koger, M., Butterworth, M. and Linares, T. 1969. Preweaning performance of Criollo and Brahman calves and their reciprocal crosses. Proc. 2nd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., Coll. Pk, Md, 1968, pp. 312–313 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1979. The growth and carcass characteristics of crosses of Hereford and Friesian with Angoni, Barotse and Boran cattle in Zambia. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 93: 423–430.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980a. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 1. Factors affecting weaner production from Angoni, Barotse and Boran dams. Anim. Prod. 30: 217–234.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W., Cruickshank, D. K. R. and Thompson, R. 1980b. Genetic and environmental influences on beef cattle production in Zambia. 2. Live weights for age of purebred and reciprocally crossbred progeny. Anim. Prod. 30: 235–243.Google Scholar
Thrift, F. A., Gallion, S. R. and Absher, C. W. 1978. Breed of sire and dam comparisons for preweaning traits under commercial beef cattle conditions, j. Anim. Sci. 46: 977–982.Google Scholar
Velarde, L., Carlos, R. and Romero, R. F. 1976. Evaluation of Brahman crossbreds in the Atlantic zone of Costa Rica. II. Growth characters. Mems. Asoc. Lat.-am. Prod. Anim.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1972. An investigational framework to assist livestock development in Ethiopia with special reference to breeding. Rep. Fd Agric. Org., Rome.Google Scholar
Woldehawariat, G. 1977. An evaluation of F1 crosses between Bos taurus and Bos indicus under different environmental conditions in Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Tex. A. & M. Univ.Google Scholar