Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T00:16:00.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies in sow reproduction. 3. The effect of nutrition between weaning and remating on the reproductive performance of multiparous sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
P. Rowlinson
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire
V. J. Croxson
Affiliation:
Co-operating Centres
J. R. Luscombe
Affiliation:
Co-operating Centres
Get access

Summary

An experiment was conducted using 176 sows at three centres to investigate the effect of post-weaning feed level on reproductive performance. At two centres sows weaned 35 to 56 days after farrowing received 1·8, 2·3, 3·6 or 4·5 kg food/day from the day following weaning until the day following the last mating at the post-weaning oestrus.

At the third centre sows were rationed to 1·8, 2·3 or 3·6 kg food/day or given all they would consume in a single 1-hr feeding period each day. Reproductive performance of the sows was not significantly affected by post-weaning feed level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brooks, P. H. 1970. Short term nutritional effects on fecundity of sows and gilts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and COLE, D. J. A. 1972a. Studies in sow reproduction. 1. The effect of nutrition between weaning and remating on the reproductive performance of primiparous sows. Anim. Prod. 15: 259264.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1972b. The effect on litter size of increased feed intake during the oestrus period in the sow. Anim. Prod. 14: 241245.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1973. The effect of feed pattern in lactation and fasting following weaning on reproductive phenomena in the sow. Vet. Rec. 93: 276280.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. 1966. The response of ewes to flushing. World Rev. Anim. Prod. 2 (4), 6987.Google Scholar
Hardy, B. and Lodge, G. A. 1969. The effect of body condition on ovulation rate in the sow. Anim. Prod. 11: 505510.Google Scholar
Heap, F. C., Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E. 1967. The influence of plane of nutrition in early pregnancy on the survival and development of embryos in the sow. J. Reprod. Fert. 13: 269279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempthorne, O. 1952. The Design and Analysis of Experiments. J. Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, D. R. 1970. The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 38: 359372.Google Scholar
MacLean, C. W. 1969. Observations on non-infectious infertility in sows. Vet. Rec. 85: 675682.Google ScholarPubMed
Pike, I. H. and Boaz, T. G. 1972. The effect of condition at service and plane of nutrition in early pregnancy in the sow. 1. Uterine and extra-uterine changes. Anim. Prod. 15: 147156.Google Scholar
Rasbech, N. O. 1969. A review of the causes of reproductive failure in swine. Br. Vet. J. 125: 599616.Google Scholar