Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T14:01:50.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential for identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in post-partum dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

A. O. Darwash ,
G. E. Lamming  and
J. A. Woolliams
A. O. Darwash
Affiliation:
Cattle Fertility Research Group, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
G. E. Lamming
Affiliation:
Cattle Fertility Research Group, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roślin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Fertility is an important component of herd production efficiency, as each additional oestrous cycle that does not result in a planned pregnancy adds to the cost of dairy farming. In addition to the negative impact on milk production, the high costs of veterinary intervention, re-insemination and herd replacement, subfertility can affect the rate of genetic gain in traits of economic merit. In contrast with the steady increase in average milk yield per cow during the last 30 years, there has been a decline in conception rate to artificial insemination in both the USA and in the UK.

The genetic correlation between yield and fertility has been equivocal. Attempts to improve the reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle through breeding and selection have been frustrated to date by the lack of heritable reproductive parameters conducive to high fertility. However, the traditional fertility parameters of interval to first service, services per conception, days open and calving intervals are highly influenced by managerial decisions and have, as expected, heritabilities too low to permit a meaningful genetic gain through selection. An alternative approach is to use the growing body of evidence that the majority of endocrine factors affecting reproduction are a result of gene expression at the hypothalamic, pituitary, ovarian or uterine level. Mechanisms such as commencement of post-partum cyclicity, follicle wave patterns, manifestation of oestrus, luteal competence and level of embryo mortality are appropriate for study. Research is required to investigate the genetic component of the variation between animals in these parameters, their phenotypic and genetic correlations with fertility and their association with other production traits.

In summary: (a) subfertility is a syndrome with multiple causes and only the symptom in common; (b) improvement in fertility will continue to be frustrated until recorded traits provide more accurate estimates of breeding values; (c) techniques are now available to estimate the genetic variation in physiological components conducive to improved reproductive efficiency; (d) once the heritable components of fertility are identified, these tools could be introduced into progeny testing and breeding nuclei, from which the genetic improvement can be widely disseminated. Selection for those components with sufficient genetic variation will result in the improvement of the integral endocrine and other physiological mechanisms favourably correlated with high fertility (e) these tools may also assist in detecting quantitative trait loci for faster genetic gain through markers-assisted selection.

Keywords

dairy cowsfertilityheritabilityhormone secretionmarker-assisted selectionquantitative trait loci
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , March 1999 , pp. 333 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, N., Beam, S. W., Butler, W. R., Deaver, D. R., Duby, R. T., Elder, D. R., Fortune, J. E., Griel, L. C., Jones, L. S., Milvae, R. A., Pate, J. L., Revah, L., Schreiber Jr, D. T., Townson, D. H., Tsang, P. C. W. and Inskeep, E. K. 1996. Relationship of fertility to patterns of ovarian follicular development and associated hormonal profiles in dairy cows and heifers. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1943–1952.Google Scholar
Allrich, R. D. 1994. Symposium: estrus, new devices and monitoring. Endocrine and neural control of estrus in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2738–2744.Google Scholar
Arendonk, J. A. M. van, Hovenier, R. and Boer, W. de. 1989. Phenotypic and genetic association between fertility and production in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 21: 1–12.Google Scholar
Auwerx, J. and Stales, B. 1997. Leptin. Lancet 351: 737–742.Google Scholar
Bagnato, A. and Oltenacu, P. A. 1993. Genetic studies of fertility traits and production in different parities in Italian Friesian cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 110: 126–134.Google Scholar
Bao, B. and Garverick, H. A. 1998. Expression of steroidogenic enzyme and gonadotropin receptor genes in bovine follicles during ovarian follicular waves: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76: 1903–1921.Google Scholar
Barash, I. A., Cheung, C. C., Wiegel, D. S., Ren, H., Kabigting, E. B., Kuijer, J. L., Clifton, D. K. and Steiner, R. A. 1996. Leptin is a metabolic signal to the reproductive system. Endocrinology 137: 3144–3147.Google Scholar
Bearden, H. J., Hansel, W. and Bratton, R. W. 1956. Fertilization and embryonic mortality of bulls with histories of either low or high fertility in artificial breeding. Journal of Dairy Science 39: 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boichard, D. and Manfredi, E. 1994. Genetic analysis of conception rate in French Holstein cattle. Acta Agriculturas Scandinavica 44: 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdon, R. M. 1997. Understanding animal breeding. Prentice Hall, NJ.Google Scholar
Bovenhuis, H., Arendonk, J. A. M. van, Davis, G., Elsen, J.-M., Haley, C. S., Hill, W. G., Baret, P. V., Hetzel, D. J. S. and Nicholas, F. W. 1997. Detection and mapping of quantitative trait loci in farm animals. Livestock Production Science 52: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W. R., Cherney, D. J. R. and Elrod, C. C., 1995. Milk urea nitrogen (MUN) analysis: field trial results on conception rates and dietary inputs. Proceedings of the Cornell nutrition conference, Rochester, NY, pp. 89–95.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caraty, A., Evans, N. P., Fabre-Nys, C. J. and Karsch, F. J. 1995. The preovulatory gonadotrophin-releasing hormone surge: neuroendocrine signal for ovulation. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 49: 245–255.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E. and Chapman, A. B. 1951. Factors affecting the incidence of cystic ovaries in a herd of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 14: 753–759.Google Scholar
Dadati, E., Kennedy, B. W. and Burnside, E. B. 1986. Relationships between confirmation and calving interval in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 3112–3119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwash, A. O. and Lamming, G. E. 1995. To define and quantify atypical ovarian function in untreated postpartum cows. Biology of Reproduction 52: (suppl. 1) 64 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O. and Lamming, G. E. 1997. Abnormal ovarian patterns as a cause of subfertility in dairy cattle: protocols for early detection and treatment. Cattle Practice 5: 3–7.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O. and Lamming, G. E. 1998. The importance of progesterone levels during early pregnancy in the cow. Journal of Animal Breeding 2: 41–43.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O., Lamming, G. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1997a. Estimation of genetic variation in the interval from calving to postpartum ovulation of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 1227–1234.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O., Lamming, G. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1997b. The phenotypic association between the interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle. Animal Science 65: 9–16.Google Scholar
Darwash, A. O., Lamming, G. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1998. Identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Proceedings of an international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle; fertility and reproduction, Grub, Germany, Nov. 23-25. Interbull Bulletin 18: 40–54.Google Scholar
Diskin, M. G. and Sreenan, J. M. 1980. Fertilization and embryonic mortality rates in beef heifers after artificial insemination. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 59: 463–468.Google Scholar
Dyer, C. J., Simmons, J. M., Matteri, R. L. and Keisler, D. H. 1997. Leptin receptor mRNA is expressed in ewe anterior pituitary and adipose tissues and is differentially expressed in hypothalamic regions of well-fed and feed-restricted ewes. Dometic Animal Endocrinology 14: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, J. Å. and Wretler, E. 1990. Sire evaluation for diseases in Sweden. World Review of Animal Production 25: 29–32.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. and Peeler, E. J. 1993. The scope for raising margins in dairy herds by improving fertility and health. British Veterinary Journal 149: 537–547.Google Scholar
Faust, M. A., McDaniel, B. T. and Robinson, O. W. 1989. Genetics of reproduction in primiparous Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faust, M. A., Robinson, O. W. and Britt, J. H. 1988. Environmental and yield effects on reproduction in primiparous Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 3092–3099.Google Scholar
Fields, M. J. and Fields, P. A. 1996. Morphological characteristics of the bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Theriogenology 31: 1296–1325.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. 1996. A review: dairy cattle reproductive physiology and management — past progress and future prospects. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 980–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortune, J. E. and Quirk, S. M. 1988. Regulation of steroidogenesis in bovine preovulatory follicles. Journal of Animal Science 66: (suppl. 2) 1–8.Google Scholar
Garverick, H. A. 1997. Ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georges, M. A. J., Nielsen, D., Mackinnon, M. J., Mishra, A., Okimoto, R., Pasquino, A. T., Sargeant, L. S., Sorensen, A., Steele, M. R., Zhao, X., Womack, J. E. and Hoeschele, I. 1995. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics 139: 907–920.Google Scholar
Ginther, O. J., Kastelic, J. P. and Knopf, L. 1989. Comparison and characteristics of follicular waves during the bovine oestrous cycle. Animal Reproduction Science 20: 187–200.Google Scholar
Gong, J. G., Knight, C. H., Logue, D. N., Cranshaw, W. M. and Webb, R. 1998. Development of the dominant follicle is suppressed in postpartum dairy cows induced experimentally to produce maximum milk yield. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 54: In press.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. 1996. Controlled reproduction in cattle and buffaloes. CAB International, UK.Google Scholar
Haley, C. S., Lee, G. L., Fordyce, M., Baxter, G., Land, R. B. and Webb, R. 1989. Study of LH response to GnRH in the young male as a criterion of genetic merit for female reproduction in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 86: 119–133.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. B., Freeman, A. E. and Berger, P. J. 1983. Yield and fertility relationships in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 293–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R. O., Ford, S. P., Young, J. W., Conely, A. J. and Freeman, A. E. 1990. Increased production versus reproduction and energy balance in high producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62: 1922–1931.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. F. R., Cue, R. I. and Monardes, H. G. 1992. Estimates of repeatability of reproductive measures in Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1701–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heiman, M. L., Ahima, R. Sv Craft, L. S., Schoner, B., Stevens, T. W. and Flier, J. S. 1997. Leptin inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to stress. Endocrinology 138: 3859–3863.Google Scholar
Henricson, B. 1956. Genetical and statistical investigations into so-called cystic ovaries in cattle. Acta Agricultures Scandinavica 7: 1–93.Google Scholar
Hermas, S. A., Young, C. W. and Rust, J. W. 1987. Genetic relationships and additive genetic variation in productive and reproductive traits in Guernsey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 1252–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J., van der Lugt, A. W., van der Werf, J. H. J. and Ouweltjes, W. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 40: 225–232.Google Scholar
Kidder, H. E., Black, W. J., Wiltbank, J. N., Ulberg, L. C. and Casida, L. E. 1954. Fertilization rates in cows bred to bulls of different levels of fertility. Journal of Dairy Science 37: 691–697.Google Scholar
Knott, S. A., Elsen, J.-M. and Haley, C. S. 1996. Methods for multiple marker-mapping of quantitative trait loci in half-sib populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93: 71–80.Google Scholar
Laben, R. L., Shanks, R., Berger, P. J. and Freeman, A. E. 1982. Factors affecting milk yield and reproductive performance. Jourrral of Dairy Science 65: 1004–1015.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Bulman, D. C. 1976. The use of milk progesterone radioimmunoassay in the diagnosis and treatment of subfertility in dairy cows. British Veterinary Journal 132: 507–517.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Darwash, A. O. 1995. Effects of inter-luteal interval on subsequent luteal phase length and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Biology of Reproduction 52:(suppl. 1) 72 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Darwash, A. O. 1998. The use of milk progesterone profiles to characterise components of subfertility in milked dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 52: 175–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H. K., Oltanacu, P. A., Van Vleck, L. D., Erb, H. N. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Heritabilities of and genetic correlations among six health problems in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 180–186.Google Scholar
Liou, S. S., Lim, J. M., Blair, R. M. and Hansel, W. 1997. Leptin causes release of LH and FSH from perfused murine and bovine pituitary glands. Biology of Reproduction 56: (suppl. 1)171 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mackinnon, M. J., Corbet, N. J., Meyer, K., Burrow, H. M., Bryan, R. P. and Hetzel, D. J. S. 1991. Genetic parameters for testosterone response to GnRH stimulation and scrota! circumference in tropical beef bulls. Livestock Production Science 29: 297–309.Google Scholar
Mackinnon, M. J. and Georges, M. A. J. 1998. Markers-assisted preselection of young dairy sires prior to progeny testing. Livestock Production Science 54: 229–250.Google Scholar
Magoffin, D. A. and Huang, C. T. F. 1998. Leptin and reproduction. Endocrinologist 8: 79–86.Google Scholar
Mäntysaari, E. A., Gröhn, Y. T. and Quaas, R. L. 1993. Repeatability and heritability of lactational occurrence of reproductive disorders in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 17: 111–125.Google Scholar
Marti, C. F. and Funk, D. A. 1994. Relationship between production and days open at different levels of herd production. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 1682–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morberg, G. P. 1991. How behavioural stress disrupts the endocrine control of reproduction in domestic animals. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 304–311.Google Scholar
Nagatani, S. P., Guthikonda, P., Thompson, R. C., Tsukamwa, H., Maeda, K. I. and Foster, D. L. 1998. Evidence for GnRH regulation by leptin. Biology of Reproduction 58: (suppl. 1) 207 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Nebel, R. L. and McGilliard, M. L. 1993. Interactions of high milk yield and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 3257–3268.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, G. J., Powel, R. L. and Norman, H. D. 1989. Ages at calving and calving interval in cattle in the United Stages . Journal of Dairy Science 72: 685–692.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Frick, A. and Lindhe, B. 1991. Relationship of fertility to milk yield in Swedish cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 264–268.Google Scholar
Philipsson, J. 1981. Genetic aspects of female fertility in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 8: 307–319.Google Scholar
Pierson, R. A. and Ginther, O. J. 1987. Follicular populations during the oestrous cycle in heifers. I. Influence of day. Animal Reproduction Science 14: 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posso, J. and Mäntysaari, E. A. 1996. Genetic relationships between reproductive disorders, operational days open and milk yield. Livestock Production Science 46: 41–48.Google Scholar
Rhodes, F. M., De’ath, G. and Entwistle, K. W. 1995. Animal and temporal effects on ovarian follicular dynamics in Brahman heifers. Animal Reproduction Science 38: 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. 1959. Experimental design in the evaluation of genetic parameters. Biometrics, 15: 219–226.Google Scholar
Rotimi, C., Luke, A., Li, Z. H., Compton, J., Bowsher, R. and Cooper, R. 1997. Heritability of plasma leptin in a population sample of African-American families. Genetic Epidemiology 14: 255–263.Google Scholar
Royal, M. D., Darwash, A. O. and Lamming, G. E. 1998. Variation in ovarian patterns and incidence of oestrus in postpartum cows: variation between sire families. Journal of Animal Breeding 2: 37–40.Google Scholar
Savio, J. D., Keenan, L., Boland, M. P. and Roche, J. F. 1988. Pattern of growth of dominant follicles during the oestrous cycle of heifers. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 83: 663–671.Google Scholar
Sawyer, H. R. 1995. Structural and functional properties of the corpus luteum of pregnancy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 49: 97–110.Google Scholar
Selk, G. E., Wettemann, R. P., Lusby, K. S., Oltjen, J. W., Mobley, S. L., Rasby, R. J. and Garmendia, J. C. 1988. Relationships among weight change, body condition and reproductive performance of range beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 66: 3153–3159.Google Scholar
Senger, P. L. 1994. The estrus detection problem: new concepts, technologies and possibilities. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2745–2753.Google Scholar
Seykora, A. J. and McDaniel, B. T. 1983. Heritability and correlations of lactation yield and fertility for Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1486–1493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shore, L. S., Rios, C., Marcus, S., Bernstein, M. and Shemesh, M. 1998. Relationship between peripheral estrogen concentrations at insemination and subsequent fetal loss in cattle. Theriogenology 50: 101–107.Google Scholar
Short, T. H., Rothschild, M. F., Southwood, O. L, McLaren, D. G., Vries, A. de, Steen, H. van der, Eckardt, G. R., Tuggle, C. K., Helm, J., Vaske, D. A., Mileham, A. J. and Piastów, G. S. 1997. Effect of estrogen receptor locus on reproduction and production traits in four commercial pig lines. Journal of Animal Science 75: 3138–3142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirois, J. and Fortune, J. E. 1988. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in heifers monitored by real-time ultrasonography. Biology of Reproduction 39: 308–317.Google Scholar
Swaive, H. H. 1995. The effects of test-day model on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy traits. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 929–938.Google Scholar
Swiger, L. A., Harvey, W. R., Everson, D. O. and Gregory, K. E. 1964. The variance of intraclass correlation involving groups with one observation. Biometrics 20: 818–826.Google Scholar
Thatcher, W. W., Meyer, M. D. and Danet-Desnoyers, G. 1995. Maternal recognition of pregnancy. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement 49: 15–28.Google Scholar
Uribe, H. A., Kennedy, B. W., Martin, S. W. and Keltőn, D. F. 1995. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 421–430.Google Scholar
Van Cleeff, J., Lucy, M. C., Wilcox, C. J. and Thatcher, W. W. 1992. Plasma and milk progesterone and plasma LH in ovariectomized lactating cows treated with new or used controlled internal drug release devices. Animal Reproduction Science 27: 91–106.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Oldenbroek, J. K. and Lende, T. van der. 1998. The use of milk progesterone measurements for genetic improvement of fertility traits in dairy cattle. Proceedings of an international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle; fertility and reproduction, Grub, Germany, Nov. 23-25. Interbull Bulletin 18: 62–67.Google Scholar
Walker, W. L., Nebel, R. L. and McGilliard, M. L. 1996. Time of ovulation relative to mounting activity in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 1555–1561.Google Scholar
Wiltbank, M. C. 1994. Cell types and hormonal mechanisms associated with mid-cycle corpus luteum function. Journal of Animal Science 72: 1873–1883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolliams, J. A. 1997. Trait selection and its importance in the genetic improvement of fertility in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1997, p. 141 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Angus, K. D. and Wilson, S. B. 1993. Endogenous pulsing and stimulated release of growth hormone in dairy calves of high and low genetic merit. Animal Production 56: 1–8.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Løvendahl, P. 1991. Physiological attributes of male and juvenile cattle differing in genetic merit for milk yield: a review. Livestock Production Science 29: 1–6.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Smith, C. 1988. The value of indicator traits in the genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Animal Production 46: 333–345.Google Scholar
Yu, W. H., Kimura, M., Walczewska, A., Karanth, S. and McCann, S. M. 1997. Role of leptin in hypothalamic-pituitary function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 1023–1028.Google Scholar