Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:51:49.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth of individual muscles and bones in the red deer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. Wenham  and
K. Pennie
G. Wenham
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
K. Pennie
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Get access

Abstract

Fourteen red deer, three hinds and 11 stags, ranging from birth (8·8 kg) to 10 years of age (143·4 kg), were slaughtered and the carcasses dissected into individual muscles and bones.

Regression equations relating the actual weight of each component or group of components to independent variables such as age, live weight, carcass weight, total muscle weight or total bone weight were fitted to the data, the majority of which satisfactorily conformed to simple allometric relationships. Twenty of the muscles and one muscle group exhibited a pattern of growth which was better described by the inclusion of a quadratic function. The description of the data using an additional term in the allometric equation was considered to be more biologically sound than the often-used practice of fitting different coefficients to the logarithmic form of the allometric equation for each stage of growth. The group of muscles surrounding the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and those of the abdominal wall were the fastest growing, both having a growth coefficient of 1·08 with standard errors (s.e.) of 0·013 and 0·017 respectively. The slowest growth was found in the distal forelimb group of muscles (growth coefficient = 0·84, s.e. 0015), no individual muscle in this group having a growth coefficient greater than 0·9.

The bones of the axial' skeleton increased in weight faster than those of the appendicular skeleton. The growth coefficients were, axial 1·13, forelimb 0·93 and hindlimb 0·92 (s.e. 0·025, 0013 and 0·015, respectively).

The muscles of the proximal hindlimb were slightly heavier in the hind, and those of the dorsal neck and shoulder heavier in the stag.

Only one minor anatomical variation was found which was related to the insertion of the m. rhomb oideus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 247 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966a. A classification of bovine muscles based on their relative growth patterns. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 326–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and Berg, R. T. 1966b. Relative growth patterns of commercially important muscle groups of cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 7: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterfield, R. M. and May, N. D. S. 1966. Muscles of the Ox. University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Reddacliff, K. J., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and Williams, Jean. 1984. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity of Australian Dorset Horn rams and wethers. 2. Individual muscles and muscle groups. Anim. Prod. 39: 259–267.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A., White, M. R., Hardy, B. and Carr, J. R. 1976. Tissue growth in the pig. Anim. Prod. 22: 341–350.Google Scholar
Fourie, P. D. 1965. Growth and development of sheep, with special reference to New Zealand breeds. D.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Univ. Pretoria.Google Scholar
Hansson, I. and Malmfors, G. 1978. Meat production from moose, Alces alces (L). Swed. J. agric. Res. 8: 155–159.Google Scholar
Lohse, C. L., Moss, F. P. and Butterfield, R. M. 1971. Growth patterns of muscles of Merino sheep from birth to 517 days. Anim. Prod. 13: 117–126.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, I., Wenham, G. and Robinson, J. J. 1977. Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 3. The development in size and shape of the foetal skeleton. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89: 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, R. J. and Berg, R. T. 1971. Muscle growth and distribution in swine as influenced by liveweight, breed, sex and ration. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robelin, J. and Jailler, R. 1984. Croissance differentielle des regions muscu/aires des bovins de la naissance a 1'etat adulte. Variations selon le genotype at le sexe. Bull. Tech. C.R.Z.V.-Theix INRA 58: 53–57.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., Mcdonald, I., Fraser, C. and Crofts, R. M. J. 1977. Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 1. Growth of the products of conception. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, G. Y. and Fennessy, P. F. 1981. The effect of castration on some muscles of red deer (Cervus elaphusL) N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 24: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. E. 1961. A study of the growth and development of Jersey cattle. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 4: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenham, G., Fowler, V. R. and Mcdonald, I. 1973. A radiographic study of skeletal growth and development in the pig. Temporal pattern of growth. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenham, G., Mcdonald, I. and Elsley, F. W. H. 1969. A radiographic study of the development of the skeleton of the foetal pig. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar