Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:55:30.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and carcass characteristics in wether lambs of a crossbred dam line

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

A.M. van Heelsum ,
R.M. Lewis ,
M.H. Davies  and
W. Haresign
A.M. van Heelsum*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
R.M. Lewis
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
M.H. Davies
Affiliation:
ADAS Rosemaund, Preston Wynne, Hereford HR1 3PG, UK
W. Haresign
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Studies, Llanbadarn Campus, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, UK
*
†E-mail:a.vanheelsum@ed.sac.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

While crossing of specialized sire and dam breeds can be biologically efficient overall, a by-product is produced in the form of (crossbred) males of the dam line that are unwanted for breeding. In the UK sheep industry, most commercial females are first crosses between males of ‘longwool’ crossing sire breeds, predominantly the Bluefaced Leicester, and females of hill breeds. Genetic improvement of carcass quality in longwool breeds would benefit the surplus F1 males as well as filter through to the terminal sire cross lambs produced by the F1 ewes. As a first step, this paper aims to describe the growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred ‘Mule’ wether offspring of Bluefaced Leicester sires and Scottish Blackface and Hardy Speckled Face dams, and relate the crossbred performance to the ‘lean’ index and live conformation score of the sires and the breed of the dams. In each of 3 years, 1500 hill ewes divided over three sites were mated to 15 ram lambs, selected using an elliptical design to best represent the full spectrum of lean index (designed to improve muscle and decrease fat content while keeping live weight unchanged) and live conformation score present in the Penglas Bluefaced Leicester Group Breeding Scheme. Full growth and slaughter records were available on 2192 Mule wether lambs slaughtered after reaching finished condition, defined as the borderline between MLC fat class 2 and 3L. Measurements included live weight, ultrasonic muscle and fat depth, live conformation score, carcass hot and cold weight, MLC fat score (on the standard seven-point scale) and conformation score (EUROP and 15-point scale) and a visual estimation of subcutaneous fat cover. Nearly 800 carcasses were dissected; 20% had a full side and 80% a shoulder dissection. In part-dissected carcasses, shoulder dissection results were used to predict the fat and lean content of the other joints. Fat and lean percentages and absolute weights were then regressed on the lean index and the residual live conformation score of the sire. At the same finished condition, Scottish Blackface offspring were heavier, older, and had less fat and more lean based both on ultrasound and on carcass dissection measurements compared with Hardy Speckled Face offspring. The index score of the sire had a positive effect on the lean content and a negative effect on fat content of all joints. Conformation of the sire did not have a significant effect on any of the carcass composition measurements, but most conformation traits measured on the animal itself (live or on the carcass) were positively related to fat and negatively to lean content in the carcass. When taking into account differences in visually assessed subcutaneous fat percentage, the carcass conformation traits persisted only in having a positive effect on carcass fat content; none of the conformation traits had an effect on carcass lean content. The results show that selection of sires on lean index is an effective way to improve carcass composition in Mule wethers, but selection on conformation is ineffective.

Keywords

Bluefaced Leicestercarcass composition crossbred progenylambs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 43 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, N.D. and Thompson, R. 1986. Design of multivariate selection experiments to estimate genetic parameters. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 72: 466–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conington, J., Bishop, S.C., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 1998. A comparison of growth and carcass traits in Scottish Blackface lambs sired by genetically lean or fat rams. Animal Production 67: 299–309.Google Scholar
Conniffe, D. and Moran, M.A. 1972. Double sampling with regression in comparative studies of carcass composition. Biometrics 28: 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.L., Jones, D.W. and Kempster, A.J. 1983. A note on a simple criterion for choosing among sample joints for use in double sampling. Animal Production 36: 493–495.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R.J. 1972. Tissue separation – to assess beef and lamb variation. In Symposium on aspects of carcass evaluation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G.E. 1978. Animal size and efficiency: basic concepts. Animal Production 27: 367–379.Google Scholar
Heelsum, A.M. van, Lewis, R.M., Haresign, W., Williams, S.P. and Davies, M.H. 2001. Non-normality in carcass quality measurements and effects on the genetic evaluation of sheep. Livestock Production Science 69: 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H.E., Simm, G., Dingwall, W.S. and Lewis, R.M. 1999. Genetic relationships between visual and objective measures of carcass composition in crossbred lambs. Animal Science 69: 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A.J., Cook, G.L. and Grantley-Smith, M. 1986. National estimates of the body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference to trends in fatness. A review. Meat Science 17: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A.J., Croston, D. and Jones, D.W. 1981. Value of conformation as an indicator of sheep carcass composition within and between breeds. Animal Production 33: 39–49.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.M., Simm, G., Dingwall, W.S. and Murphy, S.V. 1996. Selection for lean growth in terminal sire sheep to produce leaner crossbred progeny. Animal Science 63: 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 2000. Sheep yearbook. MLC, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Simm, G. and Murphy, S.V. 1996. The effects of selection for lean growth in Suffolk sires on the saleable meat yield of their crossbred progeny. Animal Science 62: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. The use of specialized sire and dam lines in selection for meat production. Animal Production 6: 337–344.Google Scholar