Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T18:32:09.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flock-mating of progestagen-synchronized ewes. 1. The influence of ram-to-ewe ratio upon mating behaviour and lambing performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Bryant  and
T. Tomkins
M. J. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AT
T. Tomkins
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AT
Get access

Summary

Sixteen Suffolk rams, 8 previously assessed as High libido and 8 as Medium libido, were mated to groups of 6, 12,18 and 30 ewes whose oestrous cycles had been synchronized using progestagen-impregnated vaginal sponges.

Observations over a 3-day mating period indicated that no differences occurred in mating behaviour between High and Medium libido rams. As number of ewes per ram increased, the rams achieved a greater mean total number of mounts and services, but mated a smaller mean percentage of ewes. Also the time taken and the number of services required to mate with all ewes served increased substantially.

As the number of ewes per ram increased the ewes had, on average, to wait longer for their first service and were served less often. There were no statistically significant differences between treatments in the ratio of ewes lambing to ewes served.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 381 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, A. J. and Robinson, T. J. 1971. Fertility of progestagen treated ewes in relation to the numbers and concentration of spermatozoa in the inseminate. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24: 1001–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamer, E., Bermant, G. and Clegg, M. T. 1969. Copulatory behaviour of the ram Ovies aries. II. Factors affecting copulatory satiation. Anim. Behav. 17: 700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. M. M., Deas, D. W. and Fitsimons, J. 1967. Synchronisation of oestrus in ewes. Vet. Rec. 80: 590–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dzunc, P. 1970. Estimation of optimum time for insemination of gilts and ewes by double mating at certain times relative to ovulation. J. Reprod. Fert. 22: 227–232.Google Scholar
Hawk, H. W. and Conley, H. H. 1971. Loss of spermatozoa from the reproductive tract of the ewe and the intensification of sperm ‘breakage’ by progestagen. J. Reprod. Fert. 27: 339–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulet, C., Ercanbrack, S., Price, D., Blackwell, R. and Wilson, L. 1962a. Mating behaviour of the ram in the one sire pen. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 857–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C., Ercanbrack, S., Price, D., Blackwell, R. and Wilson, L. 1962b. Mating behaviour of the ram in the multi-sire pen. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C., Ercanbrack, S., Price, D., Blackwell, R. and Wilson, L. 1962C. Mating behaviour of the ewe. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 870–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J. J. and Crowley, J. P. 1972. The influence of mating management on fertility in ewes following progesterone-PMS treatment. Vet. Rec. 90: 495–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laster, D. B. and Glimp, H. A. 1972. A note on the effect of ram to ewe ratio on reproductive performance of synchronized ewes. Anim. Prod. 15: 99–102.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, R. J. and Smith, J. A. C. 1968. Studies on the number of ewes joined per ram for flock matings under paddock conditions. I. Mating behaviour and fertility. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 1029–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattner, P. E. and Braden, A. H. W. 1967. Studies in flock mating of sheep. II. Fertilisation and pre-natal mortality. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattner, P. E., Braden, A. W. H. and George, J. M. 1971. Studies in flock mating of sheep. IV. The relation of libido tests to subsequent service activity of young rams. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 11: 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattner, P. E., Braden, A. H. W. and Turnbull, K. E. 1967. Studies in flock mating of sheep. I. Mating behaviour. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, N. W., Quinlivan, T. D., Robinson, T. J. and Smith, J. F. 1967. The fertilisation of ova following natural mating or artificial insemination after withdrawal of SC-9880- impregnated vaginal sponges from cyclic Merino ewes. Chap. XII in Control of the Ovarian Cycles in the Sheep (ed. Robinson, T. J.). Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Betts, J. E. 1972. A note on the effect of tail-tying on the reproductive performance of Welsh Mountain ewes. Anim. Prod. 14: 363–365.Google Scholar
Pepelko, W. E. and Clegg, M. T. 1965. Studies of mating behaviour and some factors influencing the sexual response of male sheep Ovies aries. Anim. Behav. 13: 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlivan, T. D. and Robinson, T. J. 1969. Numbers of spermatozoa in the genital tract after artificial insemination of progestagen-treated ewes. J. Reprod. Fert. 19: 73–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, T. J. 1967. Control of the ovarian cycle in sheep. In Reproduction of the Female Mammal. Proc. 13th Easter Sch. agric. Sci., Univ. of Nottingham, 1966, pp. 373–418.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. 1968. The synchronisation of the oestrous cycle and fertility. Proc. Vlth int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. Artif. Insemination, Paris 1968, Vol. II, pp. 1347–1383.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J., Moore, N. W., Lindsay, D. R., Fletcher, I. C. and Salamon, S. 1970. Fertility following synchronisation of oestrus in the sheep with intravaginal sponges. I. Effect of vaginal douche, supplementary steroids, time of insemination and numbers and dilution of spermatozoa. Aust. J. agric. Res. 21: 767–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, T. and Bryant, M. J. 1972. Mating behaviour in a small flock of lowland sheep. Anim. Prod. 15: 203–210.Google Scholar
Tomkins, T. and Bryant, M. J. 1974. Oestrous behaviour of the ewe and the influence of treatment with progestagen. J. Reprod. Fert. 41: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wishart, D. F. 1967. Synchronisation of oestrus in sheep. The use of pessaries. Vet. Rec. 81:276–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed