Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:48:29.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding behaviour and the intake of food and water by sheep after a period of deprivation lasting 14 h

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. J. G. Hall
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare and Human-Animal Interactions Group, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES
B. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Institute für Tierhygiene, Verhaltenskunde und Tierschutz der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Schwere-Reiter-Strasse 9, 80797 München, Germany
D. M. Broom
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare and Human-Animal Interactions Group, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES
Get access

Abstract

After 14 h of confinement in a stationary trailer, sheep were found to have lost proportionately a mean of 0·057 of their body weight. Two experiments, one with a heterogeneous flock (28·6 to 93·2 kg body weight) and the other with a more homogeneous flock (32·4 to 46·6 kg) showed very little recovery of this loss after 1 h of ad libitum food and water. When offered familiar concentrates, sheep ate on average 1·2 kg per animal in the 1st h, water only being taken in quantity (>5·01 per animal) in the next 6 h. Hay was taken at a much lower rate (0·25 kg per animal) and less water drunk (1·51 per animal). Competitive social interactions were five times more frequent during hay feeding than during concentrate feeding. After 14 h of confinement a break of Ih is evidently insufficient for feeding and watering and could result in poor welfare. If concentrates are offered, the resulting water deficit will not be redressed within 1 h, resulting in a strong motivation to drink when no water is available. If hay is offered, the heightened level of competitive social interaction could also result in poor welfare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous. 1995. Comments invited on implementation of EU transport rules. Veterinary Record 137: 498499.Google Scholar
Appleby, M. C. 1983. The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Animal Behaviour 31:600608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D. M., Goode, J. A., Hall, S. J. G., Lloyd, D. M. and Parrott, R. F. 1996. Hormonal and physiological effects of a 15 h road journey in sheep: comparison with the response to loading, handling and penning in the absence of transport. British Veterinary Journal. 152: 593604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, D. C., Randall, R. P. and Ortega, E. 1980. Relationships between eating rate of sheep and live weight gain, weight and fill of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 51:13731380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagen, R. M. and Young, D. Y. 1979. Temporal patterns of behaviors: durations, intervals, latencies, and sequences. Quantitative ethology (ed. Colgan, P. W.), pp. 79114. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Knowles, T. G., Warriss, P. D., Brown, S. N., Kestin, S. G., Rhind, S. M., Edwards, J. E., Anil, M. H. and Dolan, S. K. 1993. Long distance transport of lambs and the time needed for subsequent recovery. Veterinary Record 133: 286293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrott, R. F., Lloyd, D. M. and Goode, J. A. 1996. Stress hormone responses of sheep to food and water deprivation at high and low ambient temperatures. Animal Welfare 5: 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N. 1992. Effects of water scarcity and hot environment on appetite and digestion in ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 30:175194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1979. SAS user's guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.Google Scholar