Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:15:21.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feed intake in six lines of pigs and its influence on growth and carcass traits† 1. Feeding twice daily for 20 min per session

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. A. G. Cöp  and
G. A. J. Buiting
W. A. G. Cöp
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Husbandry ‘Schoonoord’, Driebergseweg 10d, Zeist, The Netherlands
G. A. J. Buiting
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Animal Husbandry ‘Schoonoord’, Driebergseweg 10d, Zeist, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

For a crossbreeding experiment six lines of pigs were developed from six breeds: Belgian Landrace (B), Pietrain (P), Dutch Landrace (N), Dutch Yorkshire (G), Duroc (D) and Hampshire (H). Out of 10 different litters per line, one female and one castrate male were housed and fed individually from 20 to 96 kg. All pigs were offered feed twice daily for 20 min exactly.

Maximum differences in feed intake between the lines increased from 150 g at 25 kg to more than 500 g at 95 kg live weight. Daily intake of Pietrain pigs was lower than that of all other lines. Differences between the N, H and G lines were small. The difference between the feed intake of males and females increased from zero at 27 kg to 230 g at 75 kg. Differences in daily gain were greatest between the P and G lines, and doubled during the growing period from 80 g to 170 g.

Differences in daily gain between the N, H and B lines were small. Pietrain pigs and, to a lesser extent, Belgian Landrace pigs produced more meaty carcasses but both had poorer meat quality than other other lines. It is concluded that differences in feed intake might be the main causal factor for the existence of differences between biological types of pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 291 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bekaert, H. 1973. Kan het voedertechnisch verantwoord zijn gedurende vetmestingsfase de zeugen van de bargen te scheiden. Varkensstudiedag Wessanen, Gent, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
Bergström, P. L. and Kroeske, D. 1968. Methods of carcass assessment in research on carcass quality in the Netherlands. 1. Description of the methods. Proc. Meeting of the Sub-Commission on Pig Progeny Testing. 9th Study Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
Bichard, M. and Smith, W. C. 1972. Crossbreeding and genetic improvement. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 37–52. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Bruner, W. H. and Swiger, L. H. 1968. Effects of sex, season and breed on live and carcass traits at the Ohio Swine Evaluation Station. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colen, P. Van. 1965. [Comparative study of the Belgian Landrace and Pietrain breeds.] Diss. Univ. Leuven.Google Scholar
Cöp, W 1974. Protein and fat deposition in pigs in relation to body weight gain and feeding level. Meded. LandbHoogesch. Wageningen, No. 18.Google Scholar
Desmoulin, B. 1974. [The Piétrain, Belgian Landrace, French Landrace: 3 pigs with very different capabilities and needs.] Élevage (28), pp. 95–103.Google Scholar
Du Chateau, P., Nofziger, D. L., Ahuja, L. R. and Swartzendruber, D. 1972. Experimental Curves and Rates of Change from Piecewise Parabolic Fits. Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Holtmann, W. B. and MacIntyre, T. M. 1976. Evaluation of performance at slaughter of twenty combinations of three-breed crosses of pigs. Anim. Prod. 23: 95–102.Google Scholar
Flock, D. K. 1968. [Breeding of pigs on the basis of the results from station testing.] Inaugural Dissertation, Univ. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Bichard, M. and Pease, A. H. R. 1973. Objectives in pig breeding. Proc. Pig Breeders' Roundtable, Wye.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F. 1971. Feeding for lean meat—feed intake, protein level and carcass quality relationships. Proc. 1st Symp. Pig Nutrition, Taiwan, pp. 82–90.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., English, P. R., Livingstone, R. M. and Crofts, R. M. J. 1976. Effects of simultaneous reductions of food intake and dietary protein concentration on the growth and carcass quality of bacon pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 7–16.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Webster, A. J. F., MacPherson, R. M. and Smith, J. S. 1976. Comparative aspects of the energy metabolism of Pietrain and Large White × Landrace pigs during growth. Proc. 7th Symp. Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, pp. 177–180. de Bussac, Clermont-Ferrand. EAAP Publ. No. 19.Google Scholar
Gädeken, D. 1971. [On the variability of protein production in bacon pigs.] Tierzüchter. 23: 651–653.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1960. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal sub-class numbers. United States Department of Agriculture, ARS-20-8. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J. 1968. The method of pig progeny testing applied in Poland. 1. General principles and physiological background. Proc. Meeting of the Sub-Commission on Pig Progeny Testing. 9th Study Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B. 1975. Crossbreeding experiments at A.B.R.O. Proc. 2nd Nordic Symp. Crossbreeding in Pigs, Copenhagen, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., Curran, M. K., Standal, N., Power, P., Heaney, I. H., Kallweit, E., Schröder, J., Maijala, K., Kangasniemi, R. and Walstra, P. 1975. An international comparison of pig breeds using a common control stock. Livestock Prod. Sci. 2: 367–379.Google Scholar
Kroes, Y. 1974. 42e Verslag van de Commissie van Overlag voor de Varkenshouderij, tevens belast met het toezicht op de slectiemesterijen.Google Scholar
Lindhjé, B. 1971. National breeding plans for pigs. Meddn Svensk Husdjursskötsel, No. 47.Google Scholar
Lister, D., Wood, J. D. and Perry, B. K. 1974. Towards a physiological basis for animal testing. Proc. EAAP Conf., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Mateman, G. 1974. De voederopnamesnelheid bij Groot-Yorkshire en bij Piétrain-varkens. I.V.O.-rapport C. 227.Google Scholar
Minkema, D., Cöp, W. A. G., Butting, G. A. J. and Pas, J. G. C. Van De. 1974. Pure breeding compared with reciprocal crossbreeding of Dutch Landrace (NL) and Dutch Yorkshire (GY) pigs. Proc. Working Symp. Breed Evaluation and Crossing Experiments with Farm Animals, Zeist, Netherlands, pp. 297–312.Google Scholar
Nielsen, A. J. 1970. [The energy value of complete feeds for growing pigs as estimated by different methods.] Beretn. Forsegslab., No. 381.Google Scholar
Omtvedt, I. T. 1974. Current swine breeding research in the United States and Canada. Proc. Working Symp. Breed Evaluation and Crossing Experiments with Farm Animals, Zeist, Netherlands, pp. 313–318.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Morton, J. R. 1969. The association of food conversion ratio, age at slaughter and carcass quality in pigs fed ad libitum. Anim. Prod. 11: 317–324.Google Scholar
Pas, J. G. C. Van De. 1971. De mogelijkheden van enkele buitenlandse varkenstrassen voor de Nederlandse Varkenshouderij. I.V.O.-rapport B-108.Google Scholar
Pfleiderer, U.-E. 1975. [Genetic parameters of fattening efficiency and carcass characteristics with restricted and ad lib. feeding.] Proc. EAAP Conf., Warsaw.Google Scholar
Piatkowski, B. and Jung, H. 1966. [Accumulation of protein by growing pigs of different sexes and types. 1. Accumulation and conversion of N and weight gain at the individual growth stages.] Arch. Tierz. 9: 307–319.Google Scholar
Unshelm, J., Dämmrich, K., Hohns, H., Oldings, B. and Rühl, R. 1972. [Physiological and morphological parameters of Göttinger Miniature pigs compared with corresponding values for baconer and fat-type pigs.] Vet.-med. Nachr., pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F., Wilde, R. De and Lampo, Ph. 1967. The quantitative effects of feed restriction in fattening pigs on weight gain, efficiency of feed utilisation and backfat thickness. Anim. Prod. 9: 67–74.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1976. Efficiencies of energy utilization during growth. In Meat Animals: Growth and Productivity (ed. Lister, D., DRhodes, . N., Fowler, V. R. and Fuller, M. R.), pp. 89–102. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar