Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:02:36.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of growth rates and resistance to nematodes of Deccani and Bannur lambs and their crosses with Garole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C. Nimbkar ,
P. M. Ghalsasi ,
A. A. Swan ,
S. W. Walkden-Brown  and
L. P. Kahn
C. Nimbkar*
Affiliation:
Nimbkar Agricultural Research Institute, Animal Husbandry Division, PO Box 23, Phaltan 415 523, Maharashtra, India Animal Science, School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
P. M. Ghalsasi
Affiliation:
Nimbkar Agricultural Research Institute, Animal Husbandry Division, PO Box 23, Phaltan 415 523, Maharashtra, India
A. A. Swan
Affiliation:
CSIRO Livestock Industries F. D. McMaster Laboratory at Chiswick Station, Locked Bag 1, PO Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
S. W. Walkden-Brown
Affiliation:
Animal Science, School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
L. P. Kahn
Affiliation:
Animal Science, School of Rural Science and Agriculture, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
*
† E-mail address: cnimbka2@pobox.une.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Sheep rearing is a traditional occupation of about 85 000 shepherd families on the Deccan plateau in the Maharashtra State of India. They rear Deccani (D) sheep which usually bear only single lambs. Prolificacy is an important trait for the efficiency of meat producing sheep. It was decided to evaluate and utilize Indian sheep genetic resources with a view to improving the efficiency of sheep production on the Deccan plateau. A crossbreeding experiment was conducted over 4 years, using rams of the D, Bannur (B) and Garole (G) breeds and D and B ewes with the aim of developing recommendations for the appropriate breed combination of a likely composite. It was found that crossing with G reduces live weight and growth rates significantly compared with D but lambs sired by G rams were more resistant to naturally acquired gastro-intestinal nematode infections and to artificial challenge with Haemonchus contortus than those sired by D or B rams. The G breed, being from a humid environment is, however, not adapted to the semi-arid Deccan plateau. The higher productivity (in terms of weight of lamb weaned) of twin-bearing ewes compared with those bearing singles was evident even in extensive rearing conditions. The finding of increased resistance to gastro-intestinal nematodes in the G breed, which also carries a major gene for prolificacy, highlights the potential for inclusion of G in a composite breed. Negative effects on growth and survival from inclusion of the Garole need to be carefully managed.

Keywords

crossbreedinggrowth ratenematodaprolificacysheep
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , June 2003 , pp. 503 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboul-Naga, A. M. 2000. Improving subtropical Egyptian fat-tailed sheep through cross-breeding with the prolific Finnsheep. In Developing breeding strategies for lower input animal production environments (ed. Galal, S. Boyazoglu, J. and Hammond, K.), ICAR technical series no. 3, pp. 293–300. ICAR, Rome.Google Scholar
Acharya, R. M. 1982. Sheep and goat breeds of India. FAO animal production and health paper no. 30, p. 97.Google Scholar
Arora, C. L. 1981. Genetic basis for improving sheep for mutton production. Proceedings of the first national seminar on sheep and goat production and utilisation, Indian Society of Sheep and Goat Production and Utilisation, Jaipur, India, pp. 105–121.Google Scholar
Arora, C. L. and Acharya, R. M. 1976. Improvement of Mandya sheep in Karnataka: a review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 46: 340–345.Google Scholar
Baker, R. L. 1996. Characterisation and utilisation of sheep and goat breeds that are resistant to helminths. In Sustainable parasite control in small ruminants (ed. Le Jambre, L. F. and Knox, M. R.), Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research proceedings no. 74, pp. 172–177. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Baker, R. L. 1998. Genetic resistance to endoparasites in sheep and goats. A review of genetic resistance to gastrointestinal nematode parasites in sheep and goats in the tropics and evidence for resistance in some sheep and goat breeds in sub-humid coastal Kenya. Animal Genetic Resources Information 24: 13–30 Google Scholar
Baker, R. L., Mugambi, J. M., Audho, J. O., Carles, A. B. and Thorpe, W. 2002. Comparison of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep for resistance to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites, productivity and efficiency in a humid and a semi-arid environment in Kenya. Proceedings of the seventh world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Montpellier, France, CD-rom no. 13–10.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. and Banerjee, S. 2000. Garole sheep of Bengal. Asian Livestock, vol. XXIV(3).Google Scholar
Chowdhury, N. 1994. Helminths of domesticated animals in Indian sub-continent. In Helminthology (ed. Chowdhury, N. and Tada, I.), pp. 73–120. Springer-Verlag, Nanesa Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Davis, G. H., Galloway, S. M., Ross, I. K., Gregan, S. M., Ward, J., Nimbkar, B. V., Ghalsasi., P. M., Nimbkar, C., Gray, G. D., Subandriyo, , Inounu, I., Tiesnamurti, B., Martyniuk, E., Eythorsdottir, E., Mulsant, P., Lecerf, F., Hanrahan, J. P., Bradford, G. E. and Wilson, T. 2002. DNA tests in prolific sheep from eight countries provide new evidence on origin of the Booroola (FecB) mutation. Biology of Reproduction 66: 1869–1874.Google Scholar
Delgado, C., Rosegrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S. and Courbois, C. 1999. Livestock to 2020. The next food revolution. Food, Agriculture and the Environment discussion paper no. 28. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
El Fadili, M., Michaux, C., Detilleux, J. and Leroy, P. L. 2000. Comparison of five crossbreeding types involving Timahdit, D’man and improved terminal sire breeds of sheep: ewe reproduction, lamb survival and growth performance. Animal Science 71: 435–441.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Maxwell, W. M. C. 1987. Salamon’s artificial insemination of sheep and goats. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H. and Mason, I. L. 1996. Less known and rare breeds. In Prolific sheep (ed. Fahmy, M. H.), pp. 178–186. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Gatenby, R. M., Bradford, G. E., Doloksaribu, M., Romjali, E., Pitono, A. D. and Sakul, H. 1997. Comparison of Sumatra sheep and three hair sheep crossbreds. I. Growth, mortality and wool cover of F1 lambs. Small Ruminant Research 25: 1–7.Google Scholar
Ghalsasi, P. M. and Nimbkar, B. V. 1993. The “Garole” – microsheep of Bengal, India. Animal Genetic Resources Information 12: 73–79.Google Scholar
Ghalsasi, P. M., Nimbkar, C., Kahn, L. P. and Walkden-Brown, S. W. 2002. Effects of different levels of worm control on meat production of Deccani sheep in shepherds’ flocks in Maharashtra, India. Proceedings of the 10th international congress of the Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP), New Delhi, India, September 23-29, p. 152.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 1999. ASREML. Biometrics bulletin no. 3, NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia.Google Scholar
Gootwine, E., Zenu, A., Bor, A., Yossafi, S., Rosov, A. and Pollott, G. E. 2001. Genetic and economic analysis of introgression of the B allele of the FecB (Booroola) gene into the Awassi and Assaf dairy breeds. Livestock Production Science 71: 49–58.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1990. User’s guide for LSMLMW and MIXMDL PC-2 version. Walter R. Harvey, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Kukovics, S. 1986. Use of highly prolific breeds and crossbreeding. In Small ruminant production in the developing countries (ed. Timon, V. M. and Hanrahan, J. P.), FAO animal production and health paper no. 58, pp. 90–105. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, A. P. and Deshpande, K. S. 1986. Factors affecting body weights at different stages and first clip fleece weight in Deccani sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 56: 971–974.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., Lahlou-Kassi, A., Anindo, D., Rege, J. E. O., Tembely, S., Tibbo, M. and Baker, R. L. 2000. Between and within breed variation in lamb survival and the risk factors associated with major causes of mortality in indigenous Horro and Menz sheep in Ethiopia. Small Ruminant Research 37: 1–12.Google Scholar
Narwade, V. E., Thorat, B. P., Deokar, D. K. and Bhoite, U. Y. 1999. Effect of season on preweaning mortality in lambs of Deccani and its crosses. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 5: 31–34.Google Scholar
Nimbkar, C., Ghalsasi, P. M., Ghatge, R. R. and Gray, G. D. 1998. Establishment of prolific Garole sheep from West Bengal in the semi-arid Deccan plateau of Maharashtra. Proceedings of the sixth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, vol. 25, pp. 257–260.Google Scholar
Nimbkar, C., Ghalsasi, P. M., Walkden-Brown, S.W, Kahn, L. P. and Gray, G. D. 2000. A comparison of the growth performance and worm resistance of lambs produced by diallel crossing of three Indian sheep breeds. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13: (suppl. B) 72–75.Google Scholar
Overend, D. J., Phillips, M. L., Poulton, A. L. and Foster, C. E. D. 1994. Anthelmintic resistance in Australian sheep nematode populations. Australian Veterinary Journal 71: 117–121.Google Scholar
Pachalag, S. V., Chattopadhyay, S. K. and More, T. 1972. A note on the field observations on the susceptibility of sheep to helminth infection. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 42: 238–239.Google Scholar
Sanyal, P. K. 1996. Gastrointestinal parasites and small ruminant production in India. In Sustainable parasite control in small ruminants (ed. Le Jambre, L. F. and Knox, M. R.), Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research proceedings no. 74, pp. 109–112. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. C., Arora, A. L., Narula, H. K. and Singh, R. N. 1999. Characteristics of Garole sheep in India. Animal Genetic Resources Information 26: 57–64.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Swarnkar, C. P., Khan, F. A., Srivastava, C. P. and Bhagwan, P. S. K. 1995. Resistance to albendazole in gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Journal of Veterinary Parasitology 9: 95–98.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Yadav, C. L. and Banerjee, D. P. 1996. Resistance of indigenous and crossbred lambs and non-lactating ewes to field infection with Haemonchus contortus . In Parasitic diseases – new horizons (ed. Banerjee, D. P. Ghosh, J. D. and Gupta, S. K.), proceedings of the eighth national congress of veterinary parasitology, Hisar, Haryana, pp. 143–150. Indian Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology.Google Scholar
Subandriyo, , Romjali, E., Batubara, A. and Batubara, L. P. 1996. Breeding for gastrointestinal nematode resistance of sheep in North Sumatra. In Sustainable parasite control in small ruminants (ed. Le, L. F. Jambre, and Knox, M. R.), pp. 134–140. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research proceedings no. 74. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia Google Scholar
Wilson, T., Wu, X., Juengel, J., Ross, I., Lumsden, J., Lord, E., Dodds, K., Walling, G., McEwan, J., O’Connell, A., McNatty, K. and Montgomery, G. 2001. Highly prolific Booroola sheep have a mutation in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein IB receptor (ALK-6) that is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells. Biology of Reproduction 64: 1225–1235.Google Scholar
Woolaston, R. R. and Piper, L. R. 1996. Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation. Animal Science 62: 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, C. L., Kumar, R., Uppal, R. P. and Verma, S. P. 1995. Multiple anthelmintic resistance in Haemonchus contortus on a sheep farm in India. Veterinary Parasitology 60: 355–360.Google Scholar