Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:45:09.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium weight in relation to food intake and genotype in twin cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor  and
G. B. Young
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
G. B. Young
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh 9
Get access

Extract

Twenty-two Ayrshire twin female cattle were kept for up to seven years of age on six equally spaced levels of constant food intake, ranging from 35 to 140 lb per week of a complete pelleted diet. Analysis was confined to the period between 5 and 7 years when growth had practically ceased and equilibrium maintenance requirements could be determined.

Equilibrium weight maintained was directly proportional to the level of constant food intake.

This relationship obtained by controlling food intake was significantly different from the 0·73 power relationship that applies across species. In establishing the present relationship, systematic genetic differences were excluded, and this is probably the main condition required for weight eventually maintained to be proportional to food intake. In contrast, the well-established proportionality of food intake to metabolic weight is essentially based on a species comparison and is thus due almost entirely to genetic differences.

A mathematical model is given which combines (1) the genetic relationship of proportionality of voluntary food intake to mature metabolic weight and (2) the nutritional relationship of proportionality of equilibrium weight maintained to level of constant food intake. The model is then used to partition variation into systematic and random components.

The experiment provides some indication of the extent of individual variation in efficiency of maintenance within breeds, the amount which is genetic, and the repeatability of this efficiency from age to age. Some information is also provided on variation in voluntary food intake, mature weight maintained and efficiency of maintenance on ad libitum feeding.

Methods of estimating efficiency of maintenance using ‘feed and weigh’ techniques, selection for efficiency of maintenance, the correlated response in mature weight, and selection for relative food capacity are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 393 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1966. The fasting metabolism of cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 20: 103–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E., Es Van, A. J. H. and Nijkamp, H. J. 1965. Further investigations on early and late cut hay, with some remarks on the design of different trials. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 205–216. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. 1962. The energy requirements of sheep for maintenance and gain. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Es Van, A. J. H., Brouwer, E. and Nijkamp, H. J. 1965. The feeding value for the maintenance of cows of hay from six parts of the Netherlands. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 95–110. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. B. 1962. The maintenance requirements of New Zealand dairy cattle. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 22: 12–34.Google Scholar
Guilbert, H. R. and Loosli, J. K. 1951. Comparative nutrition of farm animals. J. Anim. Sci. 10: 22–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, J. and Keller, A. 1965. [The effect of inter-breed differences on the maintenance requirements of growing chickens.] Biul. Zakl. Hodow. doświad. Zwierz. polsk. Akad. Nauk. 9: 101–105.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life. John Wiley and Sons, New York and London.Google Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1965. Metabolic body size. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 427–435. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. and Reardon, T. F. 1963. The effect of environment on the maintenance requirements of Merino wethers. Aus. J. agric. Res. 14: 272–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., Mcdonald, I. and Pullar, J. D. 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance by adult sheep. Anim. Prod. 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. 1960 and 1964. Comparative Nutrition of Man and Domestic Animals. Vols. 1 and 2. Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. 1961. The lifetime growth and reproduction of selected strains of mice. Heredity, Lond. 16: 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1958. Calves (dairy and beef). In Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Proc. Brighton Conf., pp. 48–75. Farmer and Stockbreeder Publications, London.Google Scholar
Seal, H. 1965. Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Biologists. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1964. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1966. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with liveweight and food intake controlled. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1967. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle on constant feeding levels. Anim. Prod. 9: 295–311.Google Scholar