Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:02:03.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy and protein utilization and partition in rabbit does concurrently pregnant and lactating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Parigi-Bini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6-35131 Padova, Italy
G. Xiccato
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6-35131 Padova, Italy
M. Cinetto
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6-35131 Padova, Italy
A. Dalle Zotte
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecniche, Via Gradenigo, 6-35131 Padova, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Changes in body composition during lactation in 40 primiparous rabbits were studied by comparative slaughter. The results were used to determine the utilization of digestible energy (DE) and digestible protein (DP) and their partitioning between maternal body, milk and foetal tissues.

Twelve does were slaughtered immediately after their first parturition (first slaughter group) to estimate initial body composition. The 28 remaining does were remated 1 to 3 days after parturition and divided into two groups offered a pelleted diet at different levels: group L, fed ad libitum and group R, fed 0·75 of ad libitum. The 19 does that were pregnant (10 of L group, 9 of R group) were kept in individual metabolism cages until their second parturition. They were then slaughtered with their litters.

Milk yield was higher (147·0 v. 117·2 g/day, P < 0·02) and live-weight loss was lower (–42 v. –294 g) in group L than in group R. The food intakes were 304·7 and 234·4 g/day, respectively. Body composition of the does changed substantially between the first and second parturition, with a considerable loss of fat and some loss of protein. A large decrease in empty body (digesta-free body) weight was observed in both groups. The loss of energy corresponded to proportionately 0·32 and 0·41 of the initial body energy, in L and R groups respectively.

The DE requirement for maintenance was estimated to be 468 kj/day per kg M0·75 and the efficiencies of utilization of DE and body energy for milk production were 0·63 and 0·76, respectively. The efficiency of utilization of DE for foetal tissue synthesis was estimated to be 0·27 throughout pregnancy. The DP requirement for maintenance was 3·80 g/day per kg M0·75 and the efficiency of utilization of DP for milk protein production was 0·76 and of body protein 0·61. The efficiency of utilization of DP for foetal protein synthesis was 0·46.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bias, J. C. de, Fraga, M. J. and Rodriguez, J. M. 1985. Units for feed evaluation and requirements for commercially grown rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 60:10211028.Google Scholar
Cheeke, P. R. 1987. Rabbit feeding and nutrition. Academic Press, Orlando, Fa.Google Scholar
De Wilde, R. O. 1980. Protein and energy retentions in pregnant and non-pregnant gilts. 2. Energy retention. Livestock Production Science 7:505510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, M. J., Lorente, M, Carabaflo, R. M. and Bias, J. C. de. 1989. Effect of diet and of remating interval on milk production and milk composition of the doe rabbit. Animal Production 48: 459466.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook, U.S. Department of Agriculture, no. 397.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1987. LSMLMW-PC1 version. Mixed least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Department of Dairy Science, Ohio State University. Columbus.Google Scholar
Hovell, F. D. De B., MacPherson, R. M., Crafts, R. M. J. and Smart, R. I. 1977. The effect of pregnancy, energy intake and mating weight on protein deposition and energy retention of female pigs. Animal Production 25: 281290.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. 1979. Efficacité de la digestion chez le lapin adulte. Effets du niveau d'alimentation et du stade de gestation. Annales de Biologie Animate, Biochimie, 19: 969973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebas, F. 1988. Livestock feed resources and feed evaluation i n Europe: III 3.2. Rabbits. Livestock Production Science 289298.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. 1989. Besoins nutritionnels des lapins. Revue bibliographique et perspectives. Cuni Sciences 5: (2), 128.Google Scholar
Ledin, I. 1984. Effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on compensatory growth, carcass composition and organ growth in rabbit. Annales de Zootechnie 33: 3350.Google Scholar
Maertens, L. and De Groote, G. 1988. The influence of the dietary energy content on the performances of post-partum breeding does. Proceedings of the fourth world rabbit vol. 3, pp. 4252.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R. 1988. Recent developments and future goals n i research on nutrition of intensively reared rabbits. Proceedings of the fourth world rabbit congress, vol. 3, pp. 129.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R., Chiericato, G. M. and Lanari, D. 1974. I mangimi grassati nel coniglio in accrescimento. Rivista di Zootecnica e Veterinaria 3:193202.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R. and Xiccato, G. 1986. Utilizzazione della energia e della proteina digeribile nel coniglio in accrescimento. Coniglicoltura 23: (4), 5456.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R., Xiccato, G. and Cinetto, M. 1990a. Energy and protein retention and partition in rabbit does during the first pregnancy. Cuni Sciences 6:1929.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R., Xiccato, G. and Cinetto, M. 1990b. Repartition de l'énergie alimentaire chez la lapine non gestante pendant la premiére lactation. Proceedings of 5émes journees de la recherche cunicole en France, vol. communication 47, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R., Xiccato, G. and Cinetto, M. 1991a. Utilizzazione e ripartizione dell'energia e della proteina digeribile in coniglie non gravide durante la prima lattazione. Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animate 17:107120.Google Scholar
Parigi-Bini, R., Xiccato, G., Cinetto, M. and Dalle Zotte, A. 1991b. Effirienza digestiva e ritenzione energetica e proteica dei coniglietti durante l'allattamento e lo svezzamento. Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animale 17:167180.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G. 1986. Meeting the protein and energy requirements of the commercial rabbit for growth and reproduction. Proceedings of the fourth world congress of animal feeding, vol. IX, pp. 271277.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G. and Allan, S. J. 1982. The effects of different intakes of crude protein on nitrogen utilization in the pregnant and lactating rabbit. Animal Production 35: 145155.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G. and Allan, S. J. 1983. The effects of dietary protein concentration on the lactational performance of the rabbit. Animal Production 37: 119123.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G., Daniels, Y. and Fordyce, R. A. 1986a. The effects of energy intake during pregnancy in doe rabbits on pup birth weight, milk output and maternal body composition change in the ensuing lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 697708.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G., Fuller, M. F. and Pullar, J. D. 1983. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of lactating rabbits. British Journal of Nutrition 49: 507516.Google Scholar
Partridge, G. G., Lobley, G. E. and Fordyce, R. A. 1986b. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of rabbits during pregnancy, lactation and concurrent pregnancy and lactation. British Journal of Nutrition 56:199207.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. B. and Van Soest, P. J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The analysis of dietary fiber in food (ed. James, W. P. T. and Theander, O.), pp. 142143. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Simplicio, J. B., Fernandez Carmona, J. and Cervera, C. 1988. The effect of a high ambient temperature on the reproductive response of the commercial doe rabbit. Proceeding of the fourth world rabbit congress, vol. 3, pp. 3641.Google Scholar
Walach-Janiak, M., Raj, St. and Fandrejewski, H. 1986. The effect of pregnancy on protein, water and fat deposition in the body of gilts. Livestock Production Science 15: 249260.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Morgan, C. A. 1990. Model components for the determination of energy and protein requirements for breeding sows: a review. Livestock Production Science 26:137.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G. and Cinetto, M. 1988. Effect of nutritive level and age on feed digestibility and nitrogen balance in rabbit. Proceeding of the fourth world rabbit congress, vol. 3, pp. 96103.Google Scholar
Young, M. 1979. Transfer of amino acids. In Placental transfer (ed. Chamberlain, G. V. P. and Wilkinson, A. W.), pp. 142158. Pitman, London.Google Scholar