Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:20:36.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of some anabolic agents on the growth, carcass and tissue composition of barley-fed entire and castrated male Friesian cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. V. Fisher ,
J. D. Wood  and
M. V. Tas
A. V. Fisher
Affiliation:
ARFC Food Research Institute — Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
ARFC Food Research Institute — Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
M. V. Tas
Affiliation:
ADAS, Drayton Experimental Husbandry Farm, Stratford-on-Avon CV37 9RQ
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-eight barley-fed entire and castrated male Friesian calves were used to examine the effects of different implanted anabolic agents on growth and carcass and tissue composition. Entire males were implanted with trenbolone acetate plus hexoestrol alone or following an earlier implantation of zeranol, or with zeranol alone. Control bulls (no implant) and steers treated with trenbolone, acetate plus hexoestrol were also studied. The anabolic agents tended to increase growth rate in bulls, and caused an increase in fat deposition. Treated steers had more abdominal fat than all bulls, but did not have more carcass fat. However, the carcasses contained less saleable meat and had a lower retail value because of lower lean-to-bone ratio. There were no significant differences between any of the groups in the proportions of lipid and water in the lean tissue. Transporting the bulls resulted in a high pH and a dark colour in m. tongissimus. The results suggest that anabolic agents have small biological effects which directly modify the quantitative and qualitative meat production characteristics of bulls.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 195 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, D. M. and Kilkenny, B. 1980. Planned Beef Production. Granada, London.Google Scholar
Baker, F. H. and Arthaud, V. H. 1972. Use of hormones or hormone active agents in production of slaughter bulls. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 752–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brännang, E. 1971. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characteristics. Part II. Swed. J. agric. Res. 1: 69–78.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1980. Beef carcass evaluation — measurement of composition using a standardized butchery method. Memo. Meat Res. Inst., No. 46.Google Scholar
Dec Boer, H., Dumont, B. L., Pomeroy, R. W. and Weniger, J. H. 1974. Manual on EAAP reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1: 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A. V. 1983. Variation in saleable meat yield and carcass value as revealed by a UK method of commercial cutting, with particular regard to the comparison between bulls and steers. In Comparative Retail Value of Beef Carcasses (ed. Fisher, A. V.). EUR 8465 EN, pp. 22–32Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H. 1982. Growth, hormonal and metabolic response of post-pubertal entire male cattle to trenbolone acetate and hexoestrol. Anim. Prod. 35: 269–276.Google Scholar
Gregory, K. E. and Ford, J. J. 1983. Effects of late castration, Zeranol and breed group on growth, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of late maturing bovine males. J. Anim. Sci. 56: 771–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitzman, R. J. and Harwood, D. J. 1983. Radioimmunoassay of hexoestrol residues in faeces, tissues and body fluids of bulls and steers. Vet. Rec. 112: 120–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, J. A. and Cooper, R. A. 1983. Growth and carcass characteristics of intensively reared Holstein bulls implanted with Zeranol. Anim. Prod. 36: 527 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lister, D., Gregory, N. G. and Warriss, P. D. 1981. Stress in meat animals. In Developments in Meat Science — 2 (ed. Lawrie, R. A.), pp. 61–92. Applied Science Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Rumsey, T. S., Tyrrell, H. F., Dinius, D. A., Moe, P. W. and Cross, H. R. 1981. Effect of diethylstilbestrol on tissue gain and carcass merit of feedlot beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 53: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, B. M. 1978. The use of growth promoting implants in beef production. ADAS Quart. Rev. 31: 185–216.Google Scholar
Williams, D. B., Vetter, R. L., Burroughs, W. and Topel, D. G. 1975. Dairy beef production as influenced by sex, protein level and diethylstilbestrol. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1532–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R. and Bergstrom, P. L. 1980. Anatomical jointing, tissue separation and weight recording. EEC standard method for beef. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. EUR 6878 EN (Mimeograph).Google Scholar