Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T18:08:04.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of live weight at weaning on growth rate and carcass composition at different stages of maturity in Scottish Blackface lambs fed on two different diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Doney ,
J. A. Milne ,
T. J. Maxwell ,
Angela M. Sibbald  and
A. D. M. Smith
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
T. J. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Angela M. Sibbald
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
A. D. M. Smith
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute†, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Get access

Abstract

The effects of live weight at weaning on carcass composition were studied with 104 Scottish Blackface lambs offered two diets differing in protein: energy ratio. Groups of lambs were slaughtered at initial live weights of 24·1 (s.e. 1·48) kg (LL) and 28·9 (s.e. 1·67) kg (IL) and at 33 kg, 38 kg, 43 kg, 53 kg and mature live weight.

Lambs were offered two diets — low protein: energy ratio (LP, 122 g crude protein (CP) per kg dry matter (DM): 10·4 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg DM) and high protein: energy ratio (HP, 176 g CP per kg DM: 10·4 MJ ME per kg DM). The LP diet was offered ad libitum and the HP diet was restricted to a similar mean level. Muscle, fat and bone tissues in the carcass were separated and weighed and the carcass and non-carcass component tissues were analysed for chemical fat, protein and ash.

Daily live-weight gain (DLWG) of HP lambs (148 (s.e. 8·1) g/day) was significantly higher than that of LP lambs (118 (s.e. 8·1) g/day; P < 0·05) and food conversion ratios were lower up to a live weight of 43 kg (P < 0·05). There were no differences in intake or DLWG between LL and IL lambs. Mature live weight (73·3 (s.e. 1·79) kg) was not related to weaning weight or post-weaning diet.

There was no effect of diet on carcass composition at any slaughter weight but LL lambs had a higher fat proportion than IL lambs, which was significant (P < 0·05) at 33 kg only. During the feeding period, the increment of fat tissue per unit increase in live weight (348 (s.e. 15·8) g/kg LW) was not affected by live weight at the start of the diet. The difference between LL and IL lambs in fat proportion was directly related to the difference in weight gain required to reach slaughter weight. The difference was not a function of stage of maturity but only of weaning weight, itself largely determined by pre-weaning nutrition. At higher slaughter weights the relative difference decreased and became non-significant. Hence lambs lighter at weaning would be less suitable than heavier lambs for the production of light-weight lean carcasses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 401 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1984. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. and Wallace, A. S. 1978. The digestion of spring and autumn harvested perennial ryegrass by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90: 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. L. 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 21–58. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Fowler, V. R. and Gill, J. C. 1982. A study of the growth of sheep to maturity. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98: 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. and Boucque, C. V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 16: 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, I. A., Lloyd, M. D. and Mcclelland, T. H. 1985. The influence of size, sex, strain and food type on the finishing of Scottish Blackface store lambs. In Hill and Upland Livestock Production (ed. Maxwell, T. J. and Gunn, R. G.). Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 10. pp. 142–143 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, I. A. and Mcclelland, T. H. 1985. The influence of weight and sex on the performance of Blackface hoggets finished on an all-concentrate diet. Animal Production 40: 563 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. 1983. Growth and body composition of lambs on grass and forage crops in relation to intake and growth before weaning. Hill Farming Research Organisation, Biennial Report 1982–83, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Smith, A. D. M., Sim, D. A. and White, I. R. 1986. Breed-of-ewe effects on the utilization of pasture maintained at two sward heights. Animal Production 42: 455–456 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Smith, A. D. M., Sim, D. A. and Zygoyannis, D. 1984. Milk and herbage intake of suckled and artificially reared lambs at pasture as influenced by lactation pattern. Animal Production 38: 191–199.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M., El Shahat, A. A., Jones, R., Duncan, J. G. S. and Boaz, T. G. 1979. The effect of daylength and growth of lambs. 1. Comparisons of sex, level of feeding, shearing and breed of sire. Animal Production 29: 33–42.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. D., Fitzsimon, J., Emmans, G. C. and Cropper, M. R. 1985. Growth and carcase characteristics in Scottish Blackface store lambs. In Hill and Upland Livestock Production (ed. Maxwell, T. J. and Gunn, R. G.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 10, pp. 137–138 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M. D., Swift, G., Hunter, E. A., Swanston, S. and Doney, J. M. 1987. Lamb growth performance and rate of finishing in relation to sward height and herbage mass on set-stocked swards. Animal Production 44: 470–471 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Macrae, J. C., Milne, J. A., Wilson, S. and Spence, A. M. 1979. Nitrogen digestion in sheep given poorquality indigenous hill herbages. British Journal of Nutrition 42: 525–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcclelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
Mcclelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Animal Production 15: 301–306.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1984. Lamb Carcase Production, MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W. and Griffiths, D. A. 1976. Differences in body composition between three breeds of sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Animal Production 11: 57–60.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1965. A relation between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Animal Production 7: 203–220.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50: 50–55.Google Scholar