Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T04:36:24.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of heat load and photoperiod on milk yield and composition in three dairy herds in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Y. Aharoni ,
A. Brosh  and
E. Ezra
Y. Aharoni
Affiliation:
Department of Beef Cattle, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Yaar Research Centre, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
A. Brosh
Affiliation:
Department of Beef Cattle, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Yaar Research Centre, PO Box 1021, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel
E. Ezra
Affiliation:
Israel Cattle Breeders Association, PO Box 3015, Qesarya Industrial Park 38900, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Effects of heat load and of photoperiod on lactation performance were evaluated using milk test data of three Israeli Holstein herds over a period of 3 years, from 1994 to 1996. All together 2209 cows, with 28029 milk records, were included. Photoperiod effects were examined as associated with day length and daily changes in day length and heat load index was formulated as a function of the seasonal day and night ambient temperatures, to account for the heat load effect. The regression model included effects of cow, herd, year, lactation number and days in milk in addition to the seasonal effects. The dependent variables were milk yield and fat, protein and lactose concentrations. Milk yield was affected by both photoperiod and heat load, with the peak photoperiod effect in May and amplitude of 3·1 (s.d. 0·9) kg/day and negative heat load effect of-1-8 (s.d. 0·4) kg/day at its peak. Protein concentration was affected by photoperiod, with the peak effect in January (amplitude of 1·7 (s.e. 0·5) g/kg) but not by heat load (-0-2 (s.d. 0·6) glkg). Fat concentration was affected primarily by heat load (-3-4 (s.d. 0·7) g/kg), with a photoperiod effect which peaked in October (amplitude of 1·8 (s.d. 0·8) g/kg). Lactose concentration was affected by both environmental factors to a lesser extent (photoperiod amplitude of 0·6 (s.d. 0·2) g/kg and heat load effect of-0-03 (s.d. 0·16) g/kg). Comparison of the predicted seasonal effects on milk yield and composition with the annual fluctuation in the national herd showed a good match of the predicted effects with the national observations. It is concluded that while heat load relief may be beneficial, manipulation of the photoperiod may induce adverse effects on milk yield and composition.

Keywords

dairy cowsheat stresslactationphotoperiod
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , August 1999 , pp. 37 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, Y., Brosh, A. and Hölzer, Z. 1997. Photoperiodic effect on live-weight gain of bull calves. Animal Science 65: 165–171.Google Scholar
Barash, H., Silanikove, N. and Weiler, J. I. 1996. Effect of season of birth on milk, fat, and protein production of Isareli Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 79: 1016–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilodeau, P. P., Petitclerc, D., St-Pierre, N., Pelletier, G. and St-Laurent, G. J. 1989. Effects of photoperiod and pair-feeding on lactation of cows fed corn or barley grain in total mixed rations. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2999–3005.Google ScholarPubMed
Dahl, G. E., Elsasser, T. H., Capuco, A. V., Erdman, R. E. and Peters, R. R. 1997. Effects of a long daily photoperiod on milk yield and circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2784–2789.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, M. and Bergström, P. L. 1989. [The effect of increased day length in winter on the growth of beef bulls.] Instituut-voor-Veeteeltkundig-Onderzoek-Schoonoord, no. B-337, p. 34.Google Scholar
Guertin, G., Lachance, B., Pelletier, G., St-Laurent, G.J, Roy, D. L. and Petitclerc, D. 1995. Effects of photoperiod and feeding whole maize, whole barley, or rolled barley on growth performance and diet digestibility in veal calves. Livestock Production Science 44: 27–36.Google Scholar
Her, E., Wolfenson, D., Flemenbaum, I., Folman, Y., Kaim, M. and Berman, A. 1988. Thermal, productive, and reproductive responses of high yielding cows exposed to short-term cooling in summer. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 1085–1092.Google Scholar
Kashiwamura, F., Furumura, K., Iketaki, T., Shinde, Y., Aotani, H., Suda, T. and Sato, F. 1991. Relationship between photoperiod and seasonality of milk production in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 62: 1156–1158.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1995. Genstat 5 release 3.2. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Moody, E. G., Van Soest, P. J., McDowell, R. E. and Ford, G. L. 1968. Effects of high temperature and dietary fat on performance of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 1909–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossberg, I. and Jönsson, H. 1996. The influence of day length and temperature on food intake and growth rate of bulls given concentrate or grass silage ad libitum in two housing systems. Animal Science 62: 233–240.Google Scholar
Nianogo, A. J., Amos, H. E., Froetschel, M. A. and Keery, C. M. 1991. Dietary fat, protein degradability, and calving season: effects on nutrient use and performance of early lactation cows. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 2243–2255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, R. R., Chapín, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1981. Milk yield, feed intake, prolactin, growth hormone and glucocorticoid response of cows to supplemented light. Journal of Daily Science 64: 1671–1678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C. J. C. and Schofield, S. A. 1989. The effect of supplementary light on the production and behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Production 48: 293–303.Google Scholar
Piva, G., Navarotto, P., Repetti, S. and Fusconi, G. 1992. Effect of photoperiod on the performance of dairy cows. Atti della Società Italiana di Buiatrin 24: 114–119.Google Scholar
Ryan, D. P., Boland, M. P., Kopel, E., Armstrong, D., Munyakazi, L., Godke, R. A. and Ingraham, R. H. 1992. Evaluating two different evaporative cooling management systems for dairy cows in a hot, dry climate. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1052–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillo, K. K., Hall, J. B. and Hileman, S. M. 1992. Effects of nutrition and season on the onset of puberty in the beef heifer. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3994–4005.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanisiewski, E. P., Mellenberger, R. W., Anderson, C. R. and Tucker, H. A. 1985. Effect of photoperiod on milk yield and milk fat in commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1134–1140.Google ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1989. SAS®/STAT user’s guide, version 6.03 edition. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar