Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:55:59.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of divergent selection for body weight on fibre number and diameter in two mouse muscles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. P. Hanrahan
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and of Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
A. C. Hooper
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and of Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
J. C. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Departments of Agricultural Biology and of Anatomy, University College, Dublin, Ireland
Get access

Summary

The effects of selection for increased or decreased body weight in mice, at 5 or 10 weeks of age, on the fibre number, fibre diameter and weight of the m. sternomastoideus and m. anterior tibialis muscles were studied. Unselected control mice were also included. Significant effects were detected in the case of each of the traits. However, the magnitude of any particular correlated response to selection varied between muscles and between selection ages in an unsystematic fashion. Most of the changes in muscle weight resulting from selection were attributable to positively correlated changes in fibre number but they were also accompanied by changes in fibre diameter in some cases.

The correlated responses described indicate the difficulty of predicting how selection for body weight changes will influence cellular structure of any given muscle.

Phenotypic correlations between muscle fibre number and diameter were essentially zero. The phenotypic correlations between muscle weight and fibre number and fibre diameter were positive.

Sex had no effect on fibre number but had an effect on fibre diameter which depended on the particular muscle and the age of the animal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bohren, B. B., Hill, W. G. and Robertson, A. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. 7: 4457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Didley, D. D., Aberle, E. D., Forrest, J. C. and Judge, M. C. 1970. Porcine muscularity and properties associated with pale soft exudative muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 681685.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. and Appleton, A. P. 1932. Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. V. J. and Naude, R. T. 1970. The accuracy of measurement of individual skeletal muscle fibres separated by a rapid technique. Lab. Pract. 19: 161164.Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y. J. 1964. The comparison study of size and number of the skeletal muscle fibres between dystrophic mice and their control mice. J. Korean Surg. Soc. 6: 523532.Google Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. 1966. Meat Science. Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. 1955. Population Genetics. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1967. Large and small muscles. Life. Sci. 6: 18211826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1970. Total number of fibres in muscles of several strains of mice. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 891893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, J. C. 1967. The effects of inbreeding on the components of litter size in mice. Genet. Res. 10: 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MaCdonald, M. A. and Slen, S. B. 1959. The effect of estradiol and testosterone injections and thyroidectomy on muscle fibre diameters and liveweight gain in yearling sheep. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 202208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrov, I. 1970. Breed and sex differences in muscle fibre diameter and meat tenderness in pigs reared under different regimes. Zhivot. Nauk. 7: 8398.Google Scholar
Rowe, R. W. D. 1967. The postnatal growth and development of striated muscle fibres in normal and dystrophic mice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Rowe, R. W. D. and Goldspink, G. 1969. Muscle fibre growth in five different muscles in both sexes of mice. I. Normal mice. J. Anat. 104: 519530.Google Scholar
Sándor, I. 1971. Muscle fibre thickness in Hungarian White pigs. Magy. Allatorv. Lap., 26: 163169.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. 1963. Relation of body size to muscle cell size and number in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 42: 283290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staun, H. 1963. Various factors affecting number and size of muscle fibres in the pig. Acta Agric. scand. 13: 293322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar