Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:14:58.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of varying weight gain during the last trimester of gestation on productivity of beef heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. C. Whittier ,
D. C. Clanton  and
G. H. Deutscher
J. C. Whittier
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE 69101, USA
D. C. Clanton
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE 69101, USA
G. H. Deutscher
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte, NE 69101, USA
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted using medium-sized crossbred beef heifers to study how manipulation of weight gain in late gestation affected production. Forty heifers were fed individually to gain according to one of three regimens for an approximate 90 day period prior to parturition: (1) 1·2 kg gain per head per day for 45 days followed by no gains for 45 days; (2) 0·6 kg gain per head per day for the entire period; (3) no gain for the first 45 days followed by 1·2 kg gain per head per day for the last 45 days. Milk production was measured by weighing of calves before and after suckling at 30, 60, and 150 days post partum. Heifers were weighed, measured for heart girth and hip weight, and visually scored for condition at the start, middle and end of the feeding period to quantify growth and condition changes. Heifers that had a high rate of gain for a short time produced more milk in early lactation than heifers that gained at a slower rate for a longer time pre-partum (P < 0·05). Calf weaning weights and dam reproductive performance were unaffected (P < 0·05) by pre-partum weight gain. It is concluded from these results, that as long as the recommended weight gain is achieved during late gestation, the timing of the weight gain is not critical to sustain productivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , August 1988 , pp. 53 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, R. V., Kittok, R. J., Ellington, E. F. and Nielsen, M. K. 1981. Effects of zeranol on growth and ease of calf delivery in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 53: 1325–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clanton, D. C., Jones, L. E. and England, M. E. 1983. Effect of rate and time of gain after weaning on the development of replacement beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 56: 280–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, T. G. and Kaltenbach, C. C. 1980. Nutrition and the postpartum interval of the ewe, sow and cow. Journal of Animal Science 51: Suppl. 2, pp. 29–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamond, D. R. 1970. The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Animal Breeding Abstracts 38: 359–372.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, J. W. 1986. A review of patterns of change in luteal function. Journal of Animal Science 62: Suppl. 2, pp. 79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1984. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 4, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 6th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1982. Users' Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shain, D. H., Hixon, D. H., Russell, W. C., Dunn, T. G. and Wiltbank, J. N. 1985. The effect of high vs low prepartum energy intake in beef cattle on reproductive parameters. Journal of Animal Science 61: Suppl. 1, p. 199 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Steel, G. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tervit, H. R., Smith, J. F. and Kaltenbach, C. C. 1977. Post-partum anoestrus in beef cattle: a review. Proceedings of New Zealand Society and Animal Production 37: 109–119.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H. 1977. The relationship between reproduction and under-nutrition in beef cattle. World Review of Animal Production 13: (2), 43–49.Google Scholar
Whitman, R. W. 1975. Weight change, body condition and beef cow reproduction. PhD Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar