Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T12:26:00.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of source and level of dietary protein on the performance of in-lamb ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. J. Forbes  and
J. J. Robinson
T. J. Forbes
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and, The Queen's University of Belfast
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough and, The Queen's University of Belfast
Get access

Extract

The aim of the investigation was to evaluate the specific effect, if any, of grass protein on the birth weight of lambs born to ewes wintered indoors. Grass meal was used as a substitute for fresh grass, and soya bean meal—representing a more conventional source of protein for winter diets—was compared with it. Both sources of protein were included at two levels, providing a high (90 g or 0·2 lb/day) and a low (45 g or 0·1 lb/day) intake of digestible crude protein.

The digestibility of dry matter was significantly higher for the diets containing soya bean meal (67·7%) than for those containing grass meal (58·2%). Dry-matter digestibility was not affected by level of protein intake. The digestibility of crude protein was significantly affected by protein source and level of intake.

Lamb birth weights were not significantly affected by source or level of dietary protein. There was a tendency for birth weights to be higher on the diet containing grass meal at low protein intakes. Ewe weight gains during the last eight weeks of gestation were significantly affected by level of dietary protein, and net body weight change was significantly affected by both source and level of protein. Gestation treatments had no effect on the performance of ewes or lambs during the first three weeks of lactation.

The retention of nitrogen during the 18th–20th weeks of gestation was affected by both source and level of dietary protein. Mean nitrogen retention was higher with diets containing soya bean meal (5·8 g per day) than with diets containing grass meal (3·6 g per day). There was no correlation between nitrogen retention and lamb birth weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 1967 , pp. 521 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council, 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2, Ruminants. Agric. Res. Council, London.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F., & Lewis, D., 1959. Metabolism in the Rumen. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G., & Blaxter, K. L., 1957. The heat increment of steam-volatile fatty acids in fasting sheep. Br. J. Nutr., 11: 247–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G., & Grant, A. I., 1949. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 39: 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., 1962. The fasting metabolism of adult wether sheep. Br. J. Nutr., 16: 615–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L., & Graham, N.McC., 1956. The effect of the grinding and cubing process on the utilisation of the energy of dried grass. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 47: 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N.McC., & Wainman, F. W., 1956. Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep and on related problems. Br. J. Nutr., 10: 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, M. I., Cuthbertson, D. P., & Synge, R. L. M., 1954. Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. 1. Duodenal administration and heat processing as factors influencing fate of casein supplements. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 44: 254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpin, S., 1962. In-wintering of in-lamb ewes. Agriculture, Land., 68: 579–582.Google Scholar
Ekern, A., Blaxter, K. L., & Sawers, D., 1965. The effect of artificial drying on the energy of grass. Br. J. Nutr., 19: 417–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, R. C., & Topps, J. H., 1964. Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. 3. Nitrogen balance trials on Blackhead Persian sheep given diets of different energy and protein content. Br. J. Nutr., 18: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, T. J., & Robinson, J. J., 1965. Effect of winter grazing on subsequent spring herbage production. Annual Progress Report, Ministry of Agriculture, N.I., p. 72.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J., & Robinson, J. J., 1966. Winter management of in-lamb ewes with special reference to housing and feeding. Res. Exp. Rec., Min. Agric., N.I., 15: 1–11.Google Scholar
Glover, J., Duthie, D. W., & French, M. H., 1957. The apparent digestibility of crude protein by the ruminant. 1. A synthesis of the results of digestibility trials with herbage and mixed feed. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 48: 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J., 1953. The effect of pregnancy and lactation in the ewe on the digestibility of the ration with a note on the partition of nitrogen the foetus at full term. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 43: 214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, R. E., Knott, J. C., Graves, R. R., & Murer, H. K., 1935. Effect of temperature of artificial drying on digestibility and availability of nutrients in pasture herbage. J. agric. Res., 50: 149–164.Google Scholar
Klosterman, E. W., Bolin, D. W., Buchanan, M. L., Bolin, F. M., & Dinusson, W. E., 1953. Protein requirements of ewes during breeding and pregnancy. J. Anim. Sci., 12: 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B., 1957. A study of the lactation and growth of hill sheep in their native environment and under lowland conditions. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 48: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T., 1959. In Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. (Ed. Cuthbertson, D. P.) Farmer and Stock-Breeder Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J., 1966. A study of the feed requirements of the breeding ewe with particular reference to protein utilisation. Ph.D. thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J., & Forbes, T. J., 1966. A study of the protein requirements of the mature breeding ewe. Maintenance requirement of the non-pregnant ewe. Br. J. Nutr., 20: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slen, S. B., & Whiting, F., 1952. Lamb production as affected by level of protein in the ration of the mature ewe. J. Anim. Sci., 11: 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W., & Aitken, F. C., 1959. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Part II. Sheep: World Survey of reproduction and review of feeding experiments. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr., No. 20.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. L., 1948. The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 38: 93–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whttelaw, F. G., & Preston, T. R., 1963. The nutrition of the early-weaned calf. III. Protein solubility and amino acid composition as factors affecting protein utilisation. Anim. Prod., 5: 131–145.Google Scholar