Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T03:14:07.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pre- and post-weaning management on subsequent pig performance to slaughter and carcass quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

P. G. Lawlor ,
P. B. Lynch ,
P. J. Caffrey  and
J. V. O’ Doherty
P. G. Lawlor*
Affiliation:
Pig Production Department, Teagasc, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
P. B. Lynch
Affiliation:
Pig Production Department, Teagasc, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
P. J. Caffrey
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin, Ireland
J. V. O’ Doherty
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University College, Dublin, Ireland
*
E-mail:plawlor@moorepark.teagasc.ie
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of weaning weight and post-weaning diet on the performance of weaned pigs. In experiment 1, 30 litters with more than 10 pigs born alive per litter were selected. At 11 days of age, pigs of average weight for the litter were removed from 15 litters so that eight pigs remained per sow. These litters were given access to creep food (16·5 MJ digestible energy (DE) per kg and 18·7 g/kg lysine). The remaining litters were left complete and were not given creep food. Pigs were weaned at 28 days of age and pairs of pigs (a male and a female littermate of similar weight) were formed from each litter (no. = 54 pairs). Pairs were blocked on the basis of litter origin and weight and assigned at random to one of the following treatments: (1) 10 kg starter diet (16·1 MJ DE per kg and 17·4 g/kg lysine) followed by link diet (15·3 MJ DE per kg and 15·0 g/kg lysine) to 27 days (high dietary regimen; HDR); or (2) 4 kg starter diet, 10 kg link diet and weaner diet to 27 days (low dietary regimen; LDR). Thereafter pigs were given common diets to slaughter at about 95·6 kg live weight. On experiment 2, four pigs (two light and two heavy) were taken from each of 32 litters (no. = 128 pigs; age = 22 days), blocked on sex, litter origin, and weaning weight and within weight category individually assigned at random to two dietary treatments: (1) high density diet (16·1 MJ DE per kg and 17·4 g/kg lysine); and (2) low density diet (15·1 MJ DE per kg and 15·7 g/kg lysine). The duration of the experiment was 26 days. In experiment 1, reducing litter size and creep feeding increased weaning weight by 0·6 kg (P 0·05). This weight advantage at weaning was lost by day 14 post weaning (P > 0·05). From day 0 to day 27 post weaning daily gain was 472 and 427 g/day (s.e.12·8; P 0·05) and food conversion efficiency was 1·26 and 1·36 g/g (s.e. 0·026; P 0·05) for HDR and LDR, respectively. In experiment 2, weaning weight was 7·1 and 5·8 kg (s.e. 0·08; P 0·01) and pig weight at day 26 post weaning was 17·5 and 15·4 kg (s.e.0·23; P 0·01) for heavy and light weight categories, respectively. In the period from day 0 to 26, food intake was 440 and 396 g/day (s.e. 8·0; P 0·01) and daily gain was 389 and 355 g/day (s.e. 8·0; P < i 0·01) for heavy and light weight categories, respectively. Weaning weight was found to be a good determinant of weight at day 26 when terms for litter origin were included (R2 = 0·67; P 0·001 for the high density diet and R2 = 0·77; P 0·001 for the low density diet). It is concluded that weaning weight can be increased by pre-weaning management but that this weight advantage is lost in the early post-weaning period. Where weaning weight was naturally higher the weight advantage was still evident at day 26 post weaning.

Keywords

carcass qualitycreep feedingpigsweaning weight
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 2002 , pp. 245 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aherne, F. X. 1982. Diets for the young pig. Proceedings of the Guelph pork symposium, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, pp. 116–159.Google Scholar
Algers, B., Jensen, P. and Steinwall, L. 1990. Behaviour and weight changes at weaning and regrouping of pigs in relation to teat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwood, C. S. and Hartmann, P. H. 1992. Collection of fore and hind milk from the sow and the changes in milk composition during suckling. Journal of Dairy Research 59: 287–298.Google Scholar
Barnett, K. L., Kornegay, E. T., Risley, C. R., Lindemann, M. D. and Schurig, G. G. 1989. Characterisation of creep feed consumption and its subsequent effects on immune response, scouring index and performance of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67: 2698–2708.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. 1989. The nutritional management of weaner pigs. In Manipulating pig production II (ed. Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P.), pp. 170–175. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. G. 1991. The nutritional management of weaner pigs. The Feed Compounder 11: 26–29.Google Scholar
Chiba, L. I. 1995. Effects of nutritional history on the subsequent and overall growth performance and carcass traits of pigs. Livestock Production Science 41: 151–161.Google Scholar
Chiba, L. I. 2000. Feeding systems for pigs. In Feeding systems and feed evaluation models (ed. Theodorou, M. K. and France, J.), pp. 181–210. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Cox, N. M., Britt, J. H., Armstrong, W. D. and Alhusen, H. D. 1983. Effect of feeding fat and altering weaning schedule on rebreeding in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 56: 21–29.Google Scholar
Cranwell, P. D., Noakes, D. E. and Hill, K. J. 1976. Gastric secretion and fermentation in the suckling pig. British Journal of Nutrition 36: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielson, D. M. 1988. Influence of starter diet complexity on subsequent performance of growing finishing pigs. Nutrition Reports International 38: 129–135.Google Scholar
De Pasillé, A. M. B., Pelletier, G., Menard, J. and Morisset, J. 1989. Relationships of weight gain and behaviour to organ weight and enzyme activities in piglets.Journal of Animal Science 67: 2921–2929.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Food (Ireland). 1994. European communities (pig carcass grading) (amendment) regulations. SI 216. Stationary Office, Dublin.Google Scholar
Dritz, S. S., Owen, K. Q., Nelssen, J. L., Goodband, R. D. and Tokack, M. D. 1996. Influence of weaning age and nursery diet complexity on growth performance and carcass characteristics and composition of high-health status pigs from weaning to 109 kilograms. Journal of Animal Science 74: 2975–2984.Google Scholar
Dwyer, C. M., Stickland, N. C. and Fletcher, M. 1994. The influence of maternal nutrition on the muscle fibre number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. Journal of Animal Science 72: 911–917.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. and Rooke, J. A. 1999. Effects of management during the suckling period on post-weaning performance of pigs. Book of abstracts of the 50th European Association for Animal Production meeting, 20-22 August 1999, Zurich, Switzerland (ed. van Arendonk, J. A. M.), paper P5. 1, p. 323 (abstr. ). Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
English, P. R., Bampton, P. R., McPherson, O., Birnie, M., Bark, L. J. and Foxcroft, G. R. 1987. Partial weaning. The growth of smaller piglets remaining on the sow following the earlier weaning of larger litter mates, relative to equivalent piglets in control litters. Animal Production 44: 465 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
English, P. R., Robb, C. M. and Dias, M. F. M. 1980. Evaluation of creep feeding using a highly digestible diet for litters weaned at 4 weeks of age. Animal Production 30: 496 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Ewan, R. C. 1991. Energy utilisation in swine nutrition. In Swine nutrition (ed. Miller, E. R. Ullrey, D. E. and Lewis, A. J.), pp. 121–132. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Geary, T. M. and Brooks, P. H. 1998. The effect of weaning weight and age on the post-weaning growth performance of piglets fed fermented liquid diets. The Pig Journal 42: 10–23.Google Scholar
Gilbertson, J., Thacker, P. A. and Kirkwood, R. N. 1989. The influence of altered weaning management on piglet growth and sow reproductive performance. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 33–37.Google Scholar
Hampson, D. J. and Kidder, D. E. 1986. Influence of creep feeding and weaning on brush border enzyme activities in the piglet small intestine. Research in Veterinary Science 40: 24–31.Google Scholar
Himmelberg, L. V., Peo Jr, E. R., Lewis, A. J. and Crenshaw, J. D. 1985. Weaning weight response of pigs to simple and complex diets. Journal of Animal Science 61: 18–26.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, S. 1995. Manipulation of pig weaning weight and the effect of weaning weight on postweaning performance of pigs. M. Agr. Sc. thesis, National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, S., Lynch, P. B., Caffrey, P. J. and Henry, W. 2002. Creep feed consumption by suckling pigs and its effect on pre- and post-weaning performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. In press.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. and Lodge, G. A. 1961. Nutrition of the weaned pig. Technical bulletin no. 22. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C. 1993a. Evaluating two sources of dried whey and the effects of replacing the corn and dried whey component with corn gluten meal and lactose in the diets of weanling swine. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2860–2866.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C. 1993b. Effect of weight, split-weaning, and nursery feeding programs on performance responses of pigs to 105 kilograms body weight and subsequent effects on sow rebreeding interval. Journal of Animal Science 71: 1991–1995.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C., Cromwell, G. L., Ewan, R. C., Hamilton, C. R. and Yen, J. T. 1998. Evaluation of the feeding duration of a phase 1 nursery diet to three-week old pigs of two weaning weights. Journal of Animal Science 76: 578–583.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C. and Lepine, A. J. 1991. Effect of pig weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms body weight. Journal of Animal Science 69: 1370–1378.Google Scholar
Miller, H. M., Toplis, P. and Slade, R. D. 1999. Weaning weight and daily live weight gain in the week after weaning predict piglet performance. In Manipulating pig production VII (ed. Cranwell, P. D.), p. 130. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Mroz, Z., Lipiec, A., Wenk, C. and Kronauer, M. 1987. The effects of birth weights and dietary lysine between 21 and 84 days of age on the subsequent performance of pigs to 225 days of age. Livestock Production Science 17: 351–363.Google Scholar
Okai, D. B., Aherne, F. X. and Hardin, R. T. 1976. Effects of creep and starter composition on feed intake and performance of young pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56: 573–586.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1991. Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 32: 139–151.Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R. and Williams, I. H. 1996. Split-weaning increases the growth of light piglets during lactation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 513–523.Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R., Williams, I. H. and Aherne, F. X. 1995. Nutrition of the neonatal pig. In The neonatal pig: development and survival (ed. Varley, M. A.), pp. 187–235. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R., Williams, I. H. and Aherne, F. X. 1996a. Maintenance of villous height and crypt depth in piglets by providing continuous nutrition after weaning. Animal Science 62: 131–144.Google Scholar
Pluske, J. R., Williams, I. H. and Aherne, F. X. 1996b. Villous height and crypt depth in piglets in response to increases in the intake of cows’ milk after weaning Animal Science 62: 145–158.Google Scholar
Seve, B. 1985. Physiological basis of nutrient supply to the piglets during the adapting and post-adapting stages of weaning. World Review of Animal Production 21: 7–14.Google Scholar
Stairs, J., Pettigrew, J. and Johnston, L. 1991a. Effects of milk products in starter diets on subsequent performance. In Recent advances in swine production and health, vol. 1, pp. 100–105. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Stairs, J., Pettigrew, J., Tokach, M. and Wilson, M. 1991b. Effects of milk products in starter diets on subsequent performance. In Recent advances in swine production and health, vol. 1, pp. 92–99. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1996. User’s guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tokach, M. D., Goodband, R. D., Nelssen, J. L. and Kats, L. J. 1992. Influence of weaning weight and growth during the first week postweaning on subsequent pig performance. Proceedings of Kansas State University swine day, pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
Usher, C. D., Green, C. J. and Smith, C. A. 1973. The rapid estimation of fat in various foods using Fosslet density apparatus. Journal of Food Technology 8: 429–437.Google Scholar
Vesseur, P. C., Kemp, B., Hartog, L. A. den and Noordhuizen, J. P. T. M. 1997. Effect of split-weaning in first and second parity sows on sow and piglet performance. Livestock Production Science 49: 277–285.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T., Taylor, H. M., Henderson, R., Wood, J. D. and Brock, D. C. 1981. Chemical and dissected composition changes in weaned piglets. Animal Production 32: 203–210.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., Walker, R., Pettigrew, J., Shurson, G. and Johnston, L. 1991. Effect on growth of weanling pigs of additional B vitamins in simple diets or in complex diets containing porcine plasma proteins and milk products. In Recent advances in swine production and health, vol. 1, pp. 79–84. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar