Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:28:27.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of level of feeding on the digestibility of diets for sheep and cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Leaver ,
R. C. Campling  and
W. Holmes
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
W. Holmes
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent
Get access

Summary

1. In the first experiment, the digestibility of diets containing ratios of 1:1 and 1:4 hay to concentrates was determined at five levels of feeding in castrated male sheep. With diet 1.1, increasing the daily dry matter intake from 600 to 1400 g resulted in a linear decline in organic matter digestibility from 74·4 to 68·6%. The same increase in level of feeding led to a curvilinear decline in the organic matter digestibility of diet 1.4 from 83·0 to 75·9%.

2. In a similar way the crude fibre digestibility of the diets declined as food intake increased. Also the increase in level of feeding caused a decrease in the mean retention time of stained hay in the alimentary tract.

3. In a second experiment the digestibility of long dried grass offered ad libitum to eight dry and eight lactating cows was measured and compared with the digestibility of similar dried grass offered at maintenance level and ad libitum to eight castrated male sheep.

4. On a metabolic live-weight basis (kg W0·73), the lactating cows ate 34% more organic matter than the dry cows and the mean voluntary intake of sheep was only 54% of the intake of dry cows.

5. The organic matter digestibility for the dry cows was 1·9 units higher than that of the lactating cows and at ad libitum intake the organic matter digestibility for the sheep was 5·6 and 3·7 units lower than that of the dry and lactating cows respectively. The results are discussed in relation to the validity of extrapolating results obtained with sheep to cattle, and with non·lactating to lactating animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2, Ruminants. Technical Reviews and Summaries. Agricultural Research Council. London.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. 1950. Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. I. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 4: 361–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balch, C. C. and Campling, R. C. 1965. Rate of passage of digesta through the ruminant digestive tract. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, (ed. Dougherty, R. W., Allen, R. S., Burroughs, W., Jacobson, N. L. and McGilliard, A. D.) pp. 108–123. Butterworth, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. 1967. The efficiency of energy transformations in ruminants. Paper at 4th Symposium on Energy Metabolism, Warsaw. (European Association of Animal Production).Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1961. The utilization of food by sheep and cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Wainman, F. W. 1964. The utilization of the energy of different rations by sheep and cattle for maintenance and for fattening. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63: 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Wainman, F. W. and Davidson, J. L. 1966. The voluntary intake of food by sheep and cattle in relation to their energy requirements for maintenance. Anim. Prod. 8: 75–83.Google Scholar
Brown, L. D. 1966. Influence of intake on feed utilization. J. Dairy Sci., 49: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchman, D. T. and Hemken, R. W. 1964. Ad libitum intake and digestibility of several alfalfa hays by cattle and sheep. J. Dairy Sci., 47: 861–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. J. 1956. The rate of passage of foodstuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. Studies on adult animals fed on hay and concentrates. Br. J. Nutr. 10: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cipoixoni, M. A., Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L. and Pavlech, H. M. 1951. Significance of the differences in digestibility of feeds by cattle and sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 10: 337–343.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. and Coup, M. R. 1954. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. A 36: 328–330.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. 1911. A digestion trial with two Jersey cows on full ration and on maintenance. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 4.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. 1913. Nutrients required for milk production. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 7.Google Scholar
Flatt, W. P. 1966. Energy metabolism results with lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 49:230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M., Jeffries, C. D., Swift, R. W., French, R. B., Miller, R. C. and Smythe, C. V. 1928. The energy metabolism of cattle in relation to the plane of nutrition. J. agric. Res. 37: 253–300.Google Scholar
Hutton, J. B. 1963. The effect of lactation on intake in the dairy cow. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 23: 39–52.Google Scholar
Reid, J. T. 1961. Problems of feed evaluation related to feeding of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 2122–2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinkel, P. G. 1960. Variations in feed intake as a cause of variation in wool production of grazing sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 11: 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. 1966. Physical studies of the alimentary tract of grazing cattle. IV. Dimensions of the tract in lactating and non-lactating cows. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 9: 999–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. G. and Loosli, J. K. 1967. Studies on the energy requirements of highproducing dairy cows. Mem. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn, No. 400.Google Scholar