Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T22:43:41.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of interaction of ewe and lamb genotype on milk production of ewes and on growth of lambs to weaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Doney ,
J. N. Peart  and
W. F. Smith
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
J. N. Peart
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
W. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
Get access

Abstract

Single and twin purebred Scottish Blackface lambs born to Blackface ewes, and Suffolk cross lambs born to East Friesland × Blackface ewes, were removed from their dams at birth and cross-fostered to give all combinations of breed of ewe, breed of lamb and number of lambs suckled, with no ewe rearing her own lamb.

Milk production was measured on 1 day/week for 14 weeks. The effect of ewe breed was significant in all weeks, with the East Friesland cross ewes having a higher peak and a more sustained level of production than the Blackface ewes. Ewes suckling twins produced more milk than those suckling singles. Breed-of-lamb effect was significant during the first 5 to 6 weeks of lactation, with crossbred lambs inducing a higher milk output than Blackface lambs, irrespective of the breed of ewe suckled. Beyond this stage, lactation potential of the ewe replaced demand by the lamb as the first limiting factor.

Food intake by ewes during the first 6 weeks differed slightly with both ewe and lamb breed but there were larger differences associated with number of lambs suckled.

The data suggest that lambs on higher milk intake consume a smaller proportion of solid feed but that, in all groups, live weight at 14 weeks of age was closely related to milk intake.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 137 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Doney, J. M. and Peart, J. N. 1976. The effect of sustained lactation on intake of solid food and growth rate of lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N., Smith, W. F. and Louda, F. 1979. A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, R. W. 1966. The relative pasture intake of grazing lambs at two levels of milk intake. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 6: 314–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horák, F. and Jakubec, V. 1964. [Studies of milk production by sheep during the consolidation period of crossbreeding between Valachian and Texel sheep.] Sb. vys. Sk. zemed. Brne, pp. 521–529.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. 1972. Growth and herbage consumption of grazing Merino and Border Leicester lambs reared by their mothers or fostered by ewes of the other breed. Anim. Prod. 14: 317–322.Google Scholar
Louda, F. and Doney, J. M. 1976. Persistency of lactation in the Improved Valachian breed of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, I. 1959. The determination of milk yield in the Merino ewe. Aust. J. agric. Res. 10: 839–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. W. 1966. Genetic factors affecting the milk intake of lambs. Aust. J. agric. Res. 17: 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1967. The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68: 365–371.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1968. Lactation studies with Blackface ewes and their lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70: 87–94.Google Scholar
Peart, J. N., Doney, J. M. and MacDonald, A. J. 1975. The influence of lamb genotype on the milk production of Blackface ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1979. Lactation patterns in Scottish Blackface and East Friesland × Scottish Blackface cross-bred ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricordeau, G. and Flamant, J.-C. 1969. [Cross-breeding of ‘Prealpes du Sud’ and ‘Friesland’ (Ostfriesisches Milchschaf) sheep. III.—Dairy performance.] Annls Zootech. 18: 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. J. agric. Sci, Camb. 72: 451–454.Google Scholar
Shalichev, Y. and Tanev, G. 1967. [Comparison of milk production and milk composition of Zlatuska and East Friesland sheep and their crosses.] Zhivot. Nauk. 4: 81–89.Google Scholar