Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T11:53:56.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of genotype and metabolizable energy intake on protein and fat gain in veal calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Meulenbroeks
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. W. A. Verstegen
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. Van der Hel
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Husbandry, Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. Korver
Affiliation:
Agricultural University, Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands
G. Kleinhout
Affiliation:
Denkavit-Nederland B.V., Voorthuizen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out with 20 male veal calves to study differences in energy metabolism between pure Dutch Friesian and Holstein Friesian crossbred calves, containing a high proportion of Holstein Friesian genes (0·79). Two metabolizable energy (ME) intakes were given. The effects of genotype and ME intake on live-weight gain and its fat and protein composition were measured by indirect calorimetry and by the total collection of faeces and urine. Energy and nitrogen balances were measured for each calf during the last 5 weeks of the fattening period of 22 weeks.

The difference in live-weight gain between the Holstein Friesian crossbreds and the Dutch Friesian calves was not significant but small differences in protein and fat composition of live-weight gain were found. Fat gain was closely related to ME intake (r = 0·95), but the correlation coefficient between ME intake and protein gain was only 0-36. Live-weight gain had a high correlation with protein gain (r = 0·70) but a lower correlation with fat gain (r = 0·29).

Veal calves at the end of the fattening period had a declining protein gain as age increased. Calves given a high ME intake (> 2 × maintenance) may require diets containing less than 216 g crude protein per kg diet at the end of the fattening period.

The study indicates that Holstein Friesian crossbred veal calves and Dutch Friesian veal calves have similar ME requirements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brouwer, E. 1965. Report of Subcommittee on Constants and Factors. In Energy Metabolism (ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 441443. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Geay, Y. and Robelin, J. 1979. Variation of meat production capacity in cattle due to genotype and level of feeding; genotype-nutrition interaction. Livestock Production Science 6: 263267.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Korver, S., Vos, H., De leede, C. A. and Meindertsma, J. 1984a. The difference between dairy and dual purpose breeds for veal production. Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 101: 341349.Google Scholar
Korver, S., Vos, H., De leede, C. A. and Meindertsma, J. 1984b. [Meat production of veal calves depending on genotype and feeding level.] Bedrijfsontwikkeling (1984), pp. 867869.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. and Van Weerden, E. J. 1970. [Can the live weight gain of healthy veal calves be predicted from the ration digested.] Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift, Wageningen 82: 109114.Google Scholar
Van Hellemond, K. K. 1970. [Influence of the protein and energy content of milk replacers on growth, feed conversion and slaughter quality of veal calves.] Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift, Wageningen 82: 121128.Google Scholar
Van Weerden, E. J., Van Es, A. J. H. and Van Hellemond, K. K. 1970. Protein and fat gain of veal calves fed different rations. Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift, Wageningen 82: 115120.Google Scholar