Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:38:49.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of climatic housing and level of nutrition on the performance of calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. E. V. Williams
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
D. Day
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
A. M. Raven
Affiliation:
West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
J. A. McLean
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr KA6 5HL
Get access

Abstract

Five hundred and seven British Friesian × Ayrshire bull calves were reared on a once-daily milk replacer feeding system from approximately 6 to 72 days of age in four naturally ventilated, unheated calf houses differing in design and degree of insulation. Environment within the calf houses was monitored each hour. Differences in design and degree of insulation produced small but significant differences in internal house temperature, humidity and air movement which had no measurable effect on calf daily live-weight gains.

Calves receiving 0·6 kg/day compared with 0·3 or 0·4 kg/day of milk replacer plus concentrates ad libitum ate less concentrates but had higher daily live-weight gains (0·56 compared with 0·49 kg/day respectively) (P < 0·001). Rations supplying similar amounts of metabolizable energy from varying proportions of milk:concentrate resulted in comparable live-weight gains. Results suggest that calf viability was affected by level of nutrition and that low levels of milk replacer feeding resulted in higher mortality. Naturally ventilated, unheated calf houses were demonstrated to be suitable for rearing calves in south-west Scotland.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1971. Calf comfort. Agriculture, Lond. 78: 323.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Wood, W. A. 1952. The nutrition of the young Ayrshire calf. 5. The nutritive value of cow's whole milk. Br. J. Nutr. 6: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clench, S. F. 1972. Early weaning of calves. Agriculture, Lond. 79: 143147.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. 1972. Simple early weaning concentrates for calves. Expl Husb., No. 22, pp. 8998.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and Davey, A. W. F. 1976. The energy metabolism of young Jersey and Friesian calves fed fresh milk. Anim. Prod. 23: 4353.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. and McLean, N. A. 1975. Effects of air temperature and air movement on the heat produced by young Friesian and Jersey calves, with some measurements of the effects of artificial rain. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 18: 277284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. T. C. and Elliot, R. C. 1972a. Dietary energy intake and utilization by young Friesland calves. 2. Digestibility and metabolizable energy contents of whole milk and spray dried skimmilk powder, and energy retentions of calves given these foods. Rhod. J. agric. Res. 10: 125133.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. T. C. and Elliot, R. C. 1972b. Dietary energy intake and utilization by young Friesland calves. 3. The utilization by calves of energy in whole milk. Rhod. J. agric. Res. 10: 135142.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, J. B. and Rutter, J. M. 1975. In Perinatal Ill-health in Calves (ed. Rutter, J. M.), pp. 3038. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. and Yarrow, N. H. 1972. Rearing of dairy cattle. 2. Weaning calves according to their concentrate intake. Anim. Prod. 14: 161165.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Jane. 1975. Dietary effects on the flow of nutrients from the abomasum of the preruminant calf. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 623633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martig, J., Boss, P. H., Nicolet, J. and Steck, F. 1976. Etiology and predisposing factors in respiratory diseases of milk fattened veal calves. Livest. Prod. Sci. 3: 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. W., Schwabe, C. W. and Franti, C. E. 1975. Dairy calf mortality rate; the association of daily meteorological factors and calf mortality. Can. J. comp. Med. 39: 377388.Google ScholarPubMed
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1973. Beef—on Target for Profit. MLC Recorded Results 1972–73. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. D. 1972a. Some environmental aspects of calf housing—a review. Fm Bldg Res. Development Stud. 2: 319.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. D. 1972b. Climatic calf housing experimental studies. Fm Bldg Res. Development Stud. 3: 1939.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. D. and Broadbent, P. J. 1973. The effect of level and method of feeding milk substitute and housing environment on the performance of calves. Anim. Prod. 17: 245256.Google Scholar
Mound, B. A. 1971. Calf housing and ventilation. In Drayton Report, pp. 4955. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Neese, K. R. and Kirchgessner, M. 1975. Change in the chemical composition and energy content of the body of fattening calves at different weights. Züchtungskunde 47: 207217.Google Scholar
Randall, Elizabeth M. and Swannack, K. P. 1975. Once a day feeding for calves. Expl Husb., No. 28, pp. 4452.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1964. The nutrition of intensively-reared calves. Vet. Rec. 76: 511526.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Stobo, I. J. F., Gaston, Helen J., Ganderton, P., Shotton, Susan M. and Ostler, D. C. 1971. The effect of environmental temperature on the performance and health of the pre-ruminant and ruminant calf. Br. J. Nutr. 26: 363381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed., pp. 135171. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures in Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Turner, P. J. 1974. Calf rearing. High Mowthorpe Exp. Husb. Fm: Fm Rev., pp. 1218. Agricultural Development and Advisory Service.Google Scholar
Van es, A. J. H., Nijkamp, H. J., Van weerden, E. J. and Van hellemond, K. K. 1969. Energy, carbon and nitrogen balance experiments with veal calves. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals (ed. Blaxter, K. L., Kielanowski, J. and Thorbek, Greta), pp. 197201. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1974. Physiological effects of cold exposure. In MTP International Review of Science. Vol. 7, Environmental Physiology (ed. Robertshaw, D.), pp. 3369. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Williams, P. E. V., Wright, C. L. and Day, N. 1980. Mortality in groups of purchased Friesian-cross calves. Br. vet. J. 136: 561566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed