Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:29:57.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of changing the physical form of roughage on the performance of the early-weaned calf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Delana B. Thomas
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
C. E. Hinks
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted using two batches of 40 purchased male Hereford × Friesian calves, reared conventionally with weaning after 5 weeks. Five diets were offered ad libitum for 9 weeks: a basic concentrate pellet A offered alone, or with additional chopped or long straw; a diet incorporating 35 g sodium bicarbonate per kg in the basic pellet; and a complete diet with the inclusion of 176g chopped straw (20 mm) per kg in the concentrate pellet.

Concentrate intakes and live-weight gains tended to increase with voluntary intake of roughage and the inclusion of buffer in the diet; giving a complete diet, however, gave the best results, with total intake increased to 1 -6 of that for diet A and also significantly increased weight gains.

Rumen acidity was decreased by roughage consumption or by buffer inclusion in the diet. Increasing roughage consumption tended to promote an increase in the molar proportions of acetic and butyric acids in the rumen liquor, and a decrease in the molar proportion of propionic acid.

Results suggested that chopping the roughage into 20-mm lengths did not obviously alter the rumen-buffering characteristics of long roughage, provided that a greater quantity was included in chopped form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W. and Kay, R. N. B. 1959. Stimulation and inhibition of reticulum contractions, rumination and parotid secretion from the forestomach of conscious sheep. J. Physiol, Lond. 149: 4357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, R. T. J. and Reid, C. S. W. 1974. Foamy bloat of cattle. A review. J. Dairy Sci. 57: 753785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, Gertrude M. 1957. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed.Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Colvin, H. W. Jr and Daniels, L. B. 1965. Rumen motility as influenced by physical form of oat hay. J. Dairy Sci. 48:935941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, H. R., Hibbs, J. W. and Pounden, W. D. 1954. The influence of the ration and early rumen development on the volatile fatty acid content of rumen juice and blood sugar levels in high roughage fed calves. J. Dairy Sci. 37: 664(Abstr.).Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadie, J. Margaret, Hobson, P. N. and Mann, S. O. 1967. A note on some comparisons between the rumen content of barley-fed steers and that of young calves also fed on a high concentrate ration. Anim. Prod. 9: 247250.Google Scholar
Godfrey, N. W. 1961. The functional development of the calf. II. Development of rumen function in the calf. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1968. A study of some factors influencing the intake of solid food by young calves. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Leeds.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 1. The effect of previous experience of solid food, and the physical form of the diet, on the development of food intake after weaning. Anim. Prod. 13: 1524.Google Scholar
Kang, H. S. and Leibholz, Jane. 1973. The roughage requirement of the early-weaned calf. Anim. Prod. 16: 195203.Google Scholar
Kay, M., Fell, B. F. and Boyne, R. 1969. The relationship between the acidity of the rumen contents and rumenitis, in calves fed on barley. Res. vet. Sci. 10: 181187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, M., MacLeod, N. A. and Andrews, R. P. 1972. Nutrition of the early-weaned calf. XII. The effect of diets differing in physical form on feed intake and rate of gain. Anim. Prod. 14: 149154.Google Scholar
Kay, M., MacLeod, N. A. and McLaren, Margaret, 1970. Nutrition of the early-weaned calf. XI. Intake of diets differing in energy concentration. Anim. Prod. 12: 413418.Google Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Grant, T. and Chudleigh, J. W. 1973a. The roughage requirement of early-weaned calves. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Hush. 13: 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Grant, T. and Chudleigh, J. W. 1973b. The effect of roughage and buffers in the diet of early weaned calves. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 13: 225228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellaway, R. C., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Osbourn, D. F. 1977. Effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 on food intake, growth rate and acid-base balance in calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 19.Google Scholar
Knox, K. L. 1960. In vitro metabolism of short-chain fatty acids in bovine rumen epithelial tissue. M.S. Thesis, Colo. St. Univ.Google Scholar
Liebholz, Jane 1975. Ground roughage in the diet of the early-weaned calf. Anim. Prod. 20: 93100.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Amir, S., Holzer, Z. and Neumark, H. 1972. Ground- and pelleted straw and hay for fattening Israeli- Friesian male calves. Anim. Prod. 15: 157165.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. J. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1965. Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 1. Pelleted rations varying in energy concentration. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 569574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R. 1975. Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum feed utilisation. Wld Rev. Nutr. Diets. 22: 152182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. R., Whitelaw, F. G., MacDearmid, A., MacLeod, N. A. and Charleson, Euphemia B. 1961. Preliminary experiments with a roughage-free diet for beef cattle. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 20: xlii–xliii (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1980. The Calf. 4th ed.Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Sakata, T. and Tamate, H. 1978. Influence of butyrate on the microscopic structure of ruminal musoca in adult sheep. Jap. J. zootech. Sci. 49: 687696.Google Scholar
Sander, E. G., Warner, R. G., Harrison, H. N. and Loosli, J. K. 1959. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. J. Dairy Sci. 42: 16001605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stangassinger, M., Beck, Ulricke and Emmanuel, B. 1979. Is glucose ketogenic in rumen epithelium? Ann. Rech. Vét. 10: 413416.Google ScholarPubMed
Strozinski, L. L. and Chandler, P. T. 1971. Effects of dietary fiber and acid-detergent lignin on body fill of ruminating calves. J. Dairy Sci. 54: 14911495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. and Simmonds, R. A. 1962. The development of the digestive system of the young animal. VI. The metabolism of short-chain fatty acids by the rumen and caecal wall of the young lamb. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59: 375379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, K., Zarow, A. and Shay, H. 1945. Rapid method for determining “crude fibre” in distillers' dried grain. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 28: 147152.Google Scholar
Zivin, J. A. and Snarr, J. F. 1973. An automated colorimetric method for the measurement of 3- hydroxybutyrate concentration. Analyt. Biochem. 52: 456461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed