Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:32:32.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of age and growth traits on puberty and reproductive performance in the gilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. J. Burnett ,
N. Walker  and
D. J. Kilpatrick
P. J. Burnett
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DP
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Food Science Centre, New forge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Get access

Abstract

An experiment involving 320 gilts was conducted to investigate the effects of age and growth traits on puberty attainment and reproductive performance in gilts given boar stimulation with or without exogenous gonadotropins. Following ad libitum feeding during rearing, groups of gilts were stimulated for puberty at one of four ages, namely 130, 150, 170 or 190 days. Within each age group, gilts were selected to maximize the variation in live weight, relocated, mixed and allocated to two treatments in a randomized-block design: (a) mature boar contact (boars only) and (b) boar contact plus an intramuscular injection of 400 i.u. pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin + 200 i.u. human chorionic gonadotropin (boars + PG600). Gilts were mated at puberty and slaughtered at 35 days post coitum.

For the gilts on the boars-only treatment, the interval from stimulation to puberty decreased significantly (P < 0·05) and became less variable with ascending age at stimulation. Increasing live weight at a given age also reduced the interval from stimulation to puberty. Multiple regression equations involving age, live weight and backfat thickness at stimulation and growth rate from birth to stimulation were calculated to obtain a prediction equation for the interval from stimulation to puberty. The effects of age and live weight at mating on ovulation rate, embryo survival and number of live embryos 35 days post coitum were not significant.

For the gilts on the boars + PG600 treatment, 92% attained puberty within 6 days of treatment, with a non-significant trend to improve with increasing age. Mating rates were similar to those on the boars-only treatment (90%). Ovulation rates were higher (P < 0·001) but embryo survival rates were lower (P < 0·001) in the boars + PG600 group, resulting in similar litter size at 35 days post coitum in the boars-only and boars + PG600 treatments. There was a non-significant trend for litter size to increase with age in the boars + PG600 treatment. Thirty-eight of the gilts treated with hormones failed to conceive and 53% were found by ovarian morphology at slaughter to be cycling normally with a tendency for this proportion to increase with age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , June 1988 , pp. 427 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bazer, F. W., Robison, O. W., Clawson, A. J. and Ulberg, L. C. 1969. Uterine capacity at two stages of gestation in gilts following embryo superinduction. Journal of Animal Science 29: 30–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Blichfeldt, T. 1983. Induction of oestrus, ovulation and fertility in gilts injected with a PMSG:HCG combination. Proceedings of 5th International Conference of Production Disease in Farm Animals, Uppsala, pp. 244–247. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. The effect of the presence of a boar on the attainment of puberty in gilts. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 23: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. H., Pattinson, M. A. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. Reproduction in the young gilt. Report of the University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
Christenson, R. K. 1981. Influence of confinement and season of the year on puberty and estrous activity of gilts. Journal of Animal Science 52: 821–830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J. R., Bell, R. W., Tribble, L. F. and Lennon, A. M. 1985. Effects of composition and density of the group on the performance, behaviour and age at puberty in swine. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. L. and Lodge, G. A. 1960. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Part III, Pigs. Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Nutrition, Technical Communication No. 21. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Furr, B. J. A. 1973. Radioimmuno assay of progesterone in peripheral plasma of the domestic fowl in various physiological states and in follicular venous plasma. Acta Endocrinologica 72: 89–100.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1982. Factors affecting the natural attainment of puberty in the gilt. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 117–138. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. E. and Cole, D. J. A. 1975. Reproduction in the gilt. 1. The influence of age and weight at puberty on ovulation rate and embryo survival in the gilt. Animal Production 21: 183–189.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. E. and Cole, D. J. A. 1976. Reproduction in the gilt. 2. The influence of gilt age at boar introduction on the attainment of puberty. Animal Production 23: 89–94.Google Scholar
Hutchens, L. K., Hintz, R. L. and Johnson, R. K. 1981. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between pubertal and growth characteristics of gilts. Journal of Animal Science 53: 946–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Aherne, F. X. 1985. Energy intake, body composition and reproductive performance of the gilt. Journal of Animal Science 60: 1518–1529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1979. The influence of age at first boar contact on puberty attainment in the gilt. Animal Production 29: 231–238.Google Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P. and Robison, O. W. 1976. Factors affecting puberty in swine. Journal of Animal Science 42: 1251–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, A. M. 1982. The controlled induction of puberty. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 179–195. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Paterson, A. M., Pearce, G. P., Foxcroft, G. R. and Reed, H. C. B. 1984. Reproductive performance of gilts induced into puberty with oestradiol benzoate or a combination of pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin. Animal Production 38: 121–128.Google Scholar
Pay, M. G. and Davis, T. E. 1973. Growth, food consumption and litter production of female pigs mated at puberty and at low body weights. Animal Production 17: 85–91.Google Scholar
Polge, C., Rowson, L. E. A. and Chang, M. C. 1966. The effect of reducing the number of embryos during early stages of gestation on the maintenance of pregnancy in the pig. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 12: 395–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rampacek, G. B., Schwartz, F. L., Fellows, R. E., Robison, O. W. and Ulberg, L. C. 1976. Initiation of reproductive function and subsequent activity of the corpora lutea in prepuberal gilts. Journal of Animal Science 42: 881–887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, D. H. and Baker, R. D. 1973. Maintenance of corpora lutea in prepuberal gilts. Journal of Animal Science 37: 762–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, G. A., McDonald, B. E. and Baker, R. D. 1970. Utero-ovarian interrelationships in prepuberal and gonatrophin treated gilts. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 50: 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1980. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1973. The analysis of designed experiments with censored observations. Biometrics 29: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulberg, L. C. and Rampacek, G. B. 1974. Embryonic and fetal development: uterine components and influences. Journal of Animal Science 38: 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webel, S. K. and Dziuk, P. J. 1974. Effect of stage of gestation and uterine space on prenatal survival in the pig. Journal of Animal Science 38: 960–963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, L. D., Pumfrey, R. A., Cunningham, P. J. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1978. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations for pre-breeding traits, reproductive traits and principal components. Journal of Animal Science 46: 937–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar