Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:27:54.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Double-low rapeseed meal for pigs: ileal apparent digestibility of amino acids in diets containing various proportions of rapeseed meal, fish meal and soya-bean meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. G. Partridge ,
A. G. Low  and
J. J. Matte
I. G. Partridge
Affiliation:
Pigs Division, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Animal Production, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
A. G. Low
Affiliation:
Pigs Division, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Animal Production, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
J. J. Matte
Affiliation:
Pigs Division, AFRC Institute of Grassland and Animal Production, Church Lane, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
Get access

Abstract

In order to determine the relative nutritional value of rapeseed meal (var. Tandem) in comparison with soya-bean meal and fish meal, seven barley-based diets were formulated to provide 13·1 MJ digestible energy and 8·8 g total lysine per kg. They contained soya-bean meal (S), rapeseed meal (R) or fish meal (F) alone, or equal proportions (on a total nitrogen basis) of soya and rapeseed, soya and fish meal, rapeseed and fish meal or soya, rapeseed and fish meal. The study involved 14 pigs growing from 40 to 90 kg, each fitted with a T cannula in the terminal ileum. Dietary treatments were applied during 7-day periods according to a 7 × 7 Latin-square design, replicated twice. The pigs were fed at 12-h intervals. Ileal digesta were collected during two 12-h periods from each pig after adaptation to each diet. Nutrient apparent digestibilities were measured using chromium III oxide as a marker; for diets S, R and F, respectively, values were: dry matter, 0·58, 0·51 and 0·66 (s.e. 0·014); N, 0·72, 0·67 and 0·73 (s.e. 0·011); lysine, 0·79, 0·72 and 0·83 (s.e. 0·010), with a similar relationship between diets for most other amino acids. In general, values for diets containing combinations of the protein supplements were intermediate between those for diets containing the respective single supplements. Following the main trial, seven pigs were given a semi-purified diet containing rapeseed meal as the only protein source; this gave amino acid digestibility values similar to or slightly higher than diet R. Diet R, which contained 375 g rapeseed meal per kg, presented no palatability problem. Rapeseed meal of the quality used in this trial could contribute a substantial proportion of the protein supplement for growing pigs. Its value should be enhanced by formulating diets according to the ileal digestibility of the limiting amino acids.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 415 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1968. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S., Leadbeater, P. A. and Horney, F. D. 1974. Digestion of protein in small and large intestine of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, P. A. 1981. Rapeseed meal from different varieties of rape in the diets of pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Veterinary College, London.Google Scholar
Lee, P. A. and Hill, R. 1983. Voluntary food intake of growing pigs given diets containing rapeseed meal, from different types and varieties of rape, as the only protein supplement. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 661–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. W. and Bell, J. M. 1971. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of some feeds for the growing pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, I. G., Low, A. G. and Matte, J. J. 1985. Digestibility of diets containing rapeseed meal, soyabean meal and fishmeal in pigs with ileal cannulas. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsog No. 580, pp. 381–384.Google Scholar
Partridge, I. G., Low, A. G., Matte, J. and Pike, I. 1985. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in diets containing rapeseed meal, fish meal and soyabean meal for pigs. Animal Production 40: 537 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Saben, H. S., Bowland, J. P. and Hardin, R. T. 1971. Digestible and metabolizable energy values for rapeseed meals and for soyabean meal fed to growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C., Cichon, R. and Misir, R. 1982. Amino acid availability and protein quality of canola and rapeseed meal for pigs and rats. Journal of Animal Science 54: 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singham, A. D. R. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1979. Acceptability and nitrogen utilisation of Tower and Erglu rapeseed meals by the growing pig. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30: 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. and Clare, N. T. 1963. Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. IX. Determination of chromic oxide in faeces using an auto analyzer. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar