Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T09:05:27.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the coat of cashmere goat kids of two different genotypes from birth to 13 months of age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Merchant  and
D. J. Riach
M. Merchant
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
D. J. Riach
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
Get access

Abstract

The development and moulting of the birth and first adult coat of two genotypes of cashmere-bearing goats, a highyielding Siberian (S) and low-yielding Icelandic × Scottish feral (IF), were examined. Samples of fibre from the neck, mid side, belly and rear-leg areas and of mid-side skin were obtained monthly from five male and five female kids of each genotype from birth to 13 months of age. Guard hair and undercoat length, secondary/primary (S/P) skin follicle ratio and the proportion of skin follicles containing a non-growing fibre with a brush end were recorded. S/P ratio reached an asymptote between 4 and 5 months of age and was higher fP < 0·01) in S (10·7) than in IF (6·7) kids. In both genotypes peaks of brush formation in primary follicles occurred between 2 and 4 months and again between 8 and 11 months of age. In contrast to primary follicles, secondary follicles had only a single peak of brush formation occurring at 10 and 8 months of age for S and IF kids respectively. Guard hair moulted from the birthcoat, but there was no loss of undercoat prior to 12 months of age and harvesting of cashmere prior to this time is unnecessary.

The secondary follicles of S kids had a longer growing period and fibre length increased at a greater rate than that of IF kids, resulting in more than a two-fold difference in the maximum undercoat length. Assessments to estimate the final weight and proportion of cashmere, made prior to completion of growth of the fleece, are likely to underestimate these parameters for high-yielding goats in comparison with their low-yielding counterparts. However, it is unlikely to alter the ranking, and hence the selection, of animals for retention in the breeding herd.

Keywords

birthcoatcashmeregoatsmoult
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 317 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, S. C. and Russel, A. J. F. 1994. Cashmere production from feral and imported cashmere goat kids. Animal Production 58: 135–144.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. 1939. Fleece density and the histology of the Merino skin. Australian Veterinary journal 15: 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M. and Smith, W. F. 1964. Modification of fleece development in Blackface sheep by variation in pre- and post-natal nutrition. Animal Production 6: 155–167.Google Scholar
Dreyer, J. H. and Marincowitz, G. 1967. Some observations on the skin histology and fibre characteristics of the Angora goat (Copra hircus Angoraensis). South African journal of Agricultural Science 10: 477–500.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. R. 1972. Postnatal secondary follicle maturation in the Angora goat. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station P.R. 3028, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, M. and Sabine, J. R. 1991. Secondary follicle development in Australian cashmere goats. Small Ruminant Research 4: 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holst, P. J., Clarke, W. H. and Maddocks, I. G. 1982. Skin and fleece characteristics of two groups of feral goats. Australian journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 22: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, A., Restall, B. J., Norton, B. W. and Winter, J. D. 1984. The postnatal development of hair follicle groups in the skin of the Australian feral goat. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15: 420–423.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. J., Hoey, W. A. and Hopkins, P. S. 1987. Cyclical fleece growth in cashmere goats. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 38: 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolena, L. A. 1959. Skin and hair follicle development in dairy goats. Virginia journal of Science 10: 33–47.Google Scholar
Margolena, L. A. 1974. Mohair histogenesis, maturation and shedding in the Angora goat. US Department of Agriculture, technical bulletin 1495.Google Scholar
Merchant, M. and Riach, D. J. 1994. The intake and performance of cashmere goats grazing sown swards. Grass and Forage Science 49: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, A. J. 1993. A method for determining the activity state of hair follicles.Bioleclmic and Histochcmistry 68: 316–325.Google ScholarPubMed
Nixon, A. J., Gurnsey, M. P., Betteridge, K., Mitchell, R. J. and Welch, R. A. S. 1991. Seasonal hair follicle activity and fibre growth in some New Zealand cashmere-bearing goats (Capra hircus). Journal of Zoology, London 224: 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, A. L., Norton, B. W. and Restall, B. J. 1992. Skin follicle development in the Australian cashmere goat. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 43: 857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, A. L., Pearson, A. J., Morris, R. and Still, L-A. 1991. An evaluation of the New Zealand Wiltshire sheep as a model for studies on the physiology of fibre growth. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 51: 365–369.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M. and McMillen, S. R. 1995. Seasonal patterns of secondary fibre growth, moulting and hair follicle activity in Siberian and Icelandic × Scottish feral goats offered high and low levels of dietary protein. Small Ruminant Research 16: 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1960. A study of the coat of the Mouflon, Ovis musimon, with special reference to seasonal change. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 135: 387–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1966. Coat structure and seasonal shedding in goats. Animal Production 8: 289–302.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1969. The development and structure of, and seasonal change in, the coat of some Wiltshire sheep. Animal Production 11: 467–477.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1973. The structure of, and growth cycles in, the coat of wild Mouflon sheep (Ovis musimon) and their crosses. Research in Veterinary Science 15: 186–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. 1968. Wool growth. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Scanlan, S. and Roger, L. C. 1992. The effect of two feeding patterns on performance of cross-bred doe kids in late pregnancy. Animal Production 54: 471A.Google Scholar
Sibbald, A. M., Fenn, P. D., Kerr, W. G. and Loudon, A. S. I. 1993. The influence of birth date on the development of seasonal cycles in red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus). journal of Zoology, London 230: 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J. 1959. Fleece shedding, staple length and fleece weight in experimental Wiltshire Horn-Scottish Blackface sheep crosses. journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 53: 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J. 1963. Birthcoat and shedding in Wiltshire Horn lambs. Animal Production 5: 301–316.Google Scholar
Slee, J. 1965. Seasonal patterns of moulting in Wiltshire Horn sheep. In Biology of the skin and hair growth (ed. Lyne, A. G. and Short, B. F.), pp. 545–563. Angus and Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
Stephenson, S. K. 1957. Wool follicle development in the New Zealand Romney and N-type sheep. 1. The relationships of development to age in the New Zealand Romney and the N-type sheep foetuses and a comparison with results obtained from the Merino. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 8: 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentzel, D. and Vosloo, L. P. 1975. Dimensional changes of follicles and fibres during pre- and postnatal development in the Angora goat. Agroanimalia 7: 61–64.Google Scholar