Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T01:14:52.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carcass composition in four sheep breeds: the importance of type of breed and stage of maturity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Wood ,
H. J. H. MacFie ,
R. W. Pomeroy  and
D. J. Twinn
J. D. Wood
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol BS18 7DY
H. J. H. MacFie
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol BS18 7DY
R. W. Pomeroy
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol BS18 7DY
D. J. Twinn
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Longford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of type of breed on carcass composition, an examination was made of 361 lambs from four breeds: Clun Forest and Colbred (termed ewe breeds); and Suffolk and Hampshire (termed ram breeds). The animals were in four carcass weight groups averaging 15, 17, 19 and 21 kg.

Percentage subcutaneous fat was influenced more by carcass weight than by breed, whereas both carcass weight and breed had similar effects on percentage lean. At the mean carcass weight of 18 kg, Colbreds, the leanest breed, had a similar value for percentage lean (about 57 % of carcass tissue weight) to the carcasses over all breeds weighing 15 kg; and Cluns, the fattest breed, had a similar value (about 54%) to those weighing 21 kg. Since the ram breeds were intermediate in composition between the two ewe breeds there was no effect of type of breed on carcass composition. The breed differences were related to eventual mature size and to the stage of maturity at each carcass weight, as judged by body length and bone weight measurements. However, Colbreds were bigger and leaner than published estimates of their mature weight suggested. Humerus weight was a good predictor of lean or total fat weight, explaining 83 % ofvariation when used as a predictor along with carcass weight.

Type of breed had a marked effect on internal fat deposition, the ewe breeds having heavier weights of both kidney knob and channel fat (KKCF) and caul fat (omental fat) than the ram breeds; and on the length oflimb bones, the ewe breeds having longer but thinner bones than the ram breeds. The order of the relative growth of the tissues and fat depots was: subcutaneous fat > caul fat > KKCF > intermuscular fat > lean > bone. Therefore, the internal fat depots were later maturing than intermuscular fat.

The percentage of prime cuts in the carcass was not affected by carcass weight. Colbreds had significantly lower values than the other breeds. Suffolks had the lowest lean to bone ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 135 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1977. Pig carcass evaluation—measurement of composition using anatomical dissection. Memorandum No. 33, Meat Res. Inst., Longford, Bristol.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1979. Sheep carcass evaluation—measurement of composition using a standardised butchery method. Memorandum No. 36, Meat Res. Inst., Langford, Bristol.Google Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M. B., Marsh, R., Wilson, J. G., Stewart, T. A., McCullough, T. A. and McCallion, T. 1975. Effects of breed of cattle on energy requirements for growth. Anim. Prod. 21: 109–119.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation—to assess beef and lamb variation. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. {New Series) 1: 113–122.Google Scholar
Harries, J. M., Williams, D. R. and Pomeroy, R. W. 1975. Prediction of comparative retail value of beef carcasses. Anim. Prod. 21: 127–137.Google Scholar
Henderson, H. E. 1969. Comparative feedlot performance of dairy and beef type steers. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf., pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cuthbertson, A. 1977. A survey of the carcass characteristics of the main types of British lamb. Anim. Prod. 25: 165–179.Google Scholar
Lister, D. 1976. Effects of nutrition and genetics on the composition of the body. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35: 351–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Anim. Prod. 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Anim. Prod. 15: 301–306.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1975. Planned crossbreeding and lamb carcase weights. Revised ed. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Meat Research Institute. 1975. A. Rep. 1974–75. Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol.Google Scholar
Owers, A. C., Pomeroy, R. W., Williams, D. R. and Scott, B. M. 1966. Major Beef Research Project. Royal Smithfield Club and Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W., Williams, D. R., Harries, J. M. and Ryan, P. O. 1974. Composition of beef carcasses. 1. Material, measurements, jointing and tissue separation. J. agric. ScL, Comb. 83: 67–77.Google Scholar
Vezinhet, A. and Prud'Hon, M. 1975. Evolution of various adipose deposits in growing rabbits and sheep. Anim. Prod. 20: 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1948. The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Parts II and III. J. agric. Set, Comb. 38: 243–302.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. 1978. Partition and distribution of fatty tissues. In Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle (ed. Boer, H. de and Martin, J.), pp. 219–229. Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar