Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:05:52.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Associations of PrP genotypes with live weight and slaughter traits in an experimental flock of Swaledale sheep in Great Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

W. Y. N. Man ,
S. Brotherstone ,
B. G. Merrell ,
W. A. Murray  and
B. Villanueva
W. Y. N. Man*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
S. Brotherstone
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
B. G. Merrell
Affiliation:
ADAS Redesdale, Rochester, Otterburn, Newcastle on Tyne NE19 1SB, UK
W. A. Murray
Affiliation:
ADAS Redesdale, Rochester, Otterburn, Newcastle on Tyne NE19 1SB, UK
B. Villanueva
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
†Email: Nicola.Man@sac.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Polymorphisms at codons 136, 154 and 171 of the gene encoding the prion protein (PrP) are associated with susceptibility to classical scrapie in sheep. Genetic selection for scrapie resistance based on PrP genotypes is central to the scrapie eradication programme in Great Britain but there are concerns about how this may affect other economically important traits. The objective of this study was to evaluate associations of PrP genotypes with live weight and slaughter traits in a hill sheep breed in Great Britain. Data used were from an experimental flock of Swaledale sheep in which the alleles ARR, ARQ, AHQ and VRQ were present. About 1450 genotyped lambs with birth, marking and weaning weights, and 620 with slaughter records were used for the study. Mixed models with various fixed effects and random direct genetic and maternal effects were tested to determine the appropriate model to use for each trait. None of the differences in lamb performance between PrP genotypes consistently reached significance. Therefore, this study does not support existence of significant relationships between PrP genotype and lamb performance traits in this breed.

Keywords

gene associationsprion diseasesscrapiesheepvariance components
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 607 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, B. M., Stobart, R. H., Russell, W. C., O'Rourke, K. I., Lewis, G. S., Logan, J. R., Duncan, J. V. and Moss, G. E. 2005. The incidence of genotypes at codon 171 of the prion protein gene (PRNP) in five breeds of sheep and production traits of ewes associated with those genotypes. Journal of Animal Science 83: 455–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barillet, F., Andreoletti, O., Palhiere, I., Agurre, X., Arranz, J. M., Minery, S., Soulas, C., Belloc, J. P., Boscher, M. Y. and Schelcher, F. 2002. Breeding for scrapie resistance using PrP genotyping in the French dairy sheep breeds. Proceedings of the seventh world congress for genetics applied to livestock production CD-ROM communication no. 13–20.Google Scholar
Baylis, M., Chihota, C., Stevenson, E., Goldmann, W., Smith, A., Sivam, K., Tongue, S. and Gravenor, M. B. 2004. Risk of scrapie in British sheep of different prion protein. genotype. Journal of General Virology 85: 2735–2740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baylis, M. and McIntyre, K. M. 2004. Scrapie control under new strain. Nature 432: 810–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandsma, J. H., Janss, L. L.G. and Visscher, A. H. 2004. Association between PrP genotypes and littersize and 135 days weight in Texel sheep. Livestock Production Science 85: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandsma, J. H., Janss, L. L.G. and Visscher, A. H. 2005. Association between PrP genotypes and performance traits in an experimental Dutch Texel herd. Livestock Production Science 95: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colegrave, N. and Ruxton, G. D. 2003. Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. Behavioral Ecology 14: 446–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, F., Borchers, N., Hamann, H., Drogemuller, C., Reinecke, S., Lupping, W. and Distl, O. 2004a. Associations between the prion protein genotype and performance traits of meat breeds of sheep. Veterinary Record 155: 140–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vries, F., Hamann, H., Drogemuller, C., Andrzejewski, M., Ganter, M. and Distl, O. 2004b. Analysis of association between the prion protein genotype and reproduction in meat sheep breeds. Animal Science 79: 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, F., Hamann, H., Drogemuller, C., Ganter, M. and Distl, O. 2005. Analysis of associations between the prion protein genotypes and production traits in East Friesian milk sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 392–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2005. http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/bse/othertses/scrapie/nsp/index.html, 19 October 2005.Google Scholar
Eglin, R. D., Warner, R., Gubbins, S., Sivam, S. K. and Dawson, M. 2005. Frequencies of PrP genotypes in 38 breeds of sheep sampled in the National Scrapie Plan for Great Britain. Veterinary Record 156: 433–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 2002. ASReml user guide release 1.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Goldmann, W., Hunter, N., Smith, G., Foster, J. and Hope, J. 1994. PrP genotype and agent effects in scrapie: change in allelic interaction with different isolates of agent in sheep, a natural host of scrapie. Journal of General Virology 75: 989–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, N., Foster, J. D., Goldmann, W., Stear, M. J., Hope, J. and Bostock, C. 1996. Natural scrapie in a closed flock of Cheviot sheep occurs only in specific PrP genotypes. Archives of Virology 141: 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, N., Goldmann, W., Foster, J. D., Cairns, D. and Smith, G. 1997. Natural scrapie and PrP genotype: case-control studies in British sheep. Veterinary Record 141: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Grantley-Smith, M. 1986. National estimates of body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference to trends in fatness: a review. Meat Science 17: 107–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, first edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Moum, T., Olsaker, I., Hopp, P., Moldal, T., Valheim, M., Moum, T. and Benestad, S. L. 2005. Polymorphisms at codons 141 and 154 in the ovine prion protein gene are associated with scrapie Nor98 cases. Journal of General Virology 86: 231–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokopova, L., Lewis, R. M., Dingwall, W. S. and Simm, G. 2002. Scrapie genotype: A correlation with lean growth rate? Proceedings of the seventh world congress for genetics applied to livestock production CD-ROM communication no. 13–44.Google Scholar
Roden, J. A., Haresign, W. and Anderson, J.M.L. 2001. Analysis of PrP genotype in relation to performance traits in Suffolk sheep. Proceedings of the British Society for Animal Science2001, p. 45.Google Scholar
Roden, J. A., Merrell, B. G., Murray, W. A. and Haresign, W. 2003. Genetic analysis of live weight and ultrasonic fat and muscle traits in a hill sheep flock undergoing breed improvement utilizing an embryo transfer programme. Animal Science 76: 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willham, R. L. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. III. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. Journal of Animal Science 35: 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar