Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:37:56.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of beef carcass quality 2. Influence of variation in grazing intensity and the level of barley supplementation with silage on the carcass and meat quality of Friesian steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. E. Hinks  and
J. H. D. Prescott
C. E. Hinks
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle Upon Tyne
J. H. D. Prescott
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle Upon Tyne
Get access

Summary

Two experiments concerning the effects, on the carcass and meat characteristics of 18-months-old Friesian steers, of variation in grazing intensity and the level of barley feeding with silage are reported.

Groups of 12 steers were grazed at different intensities over 5-month grazing periods, such that live-weight differences of 38 kg and 16 kg were recorded at housing. No compensatory growth was recorded during the subsequent winter feeding period.

Whilst the grazing treatments had little effect on carcass or meat quality, higher levels of barley feeding with silage over the winter period (710 v. 410 kg/steer) had significant effects on live-weight gain, and increased carcass weight by 21 kg at slaughter. The higher yield of carcass weight was reflected in significant differences in carcass composition, joint proportions and retail cut-out value. Sixty per cent of the carcass weight difference was removed as trim fat. Differences in carcass fatness were not associated with any differences in eating quality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 229 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended Procedures in the Measurement of Beef Cattle and Carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. 1963. Estimation of carcass composition. The anatomical approach. In Carcass Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.). C.S.I.R.O. Australia.Google Scholar
Everitt, G. C. 1966. Recent trends in carcass evaluation. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 268–283.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. E. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1972. An evaluation of beef carcass quality. 1. The influence of cereal feeding on the growth and carcass quality of Friesian steers. Anim. Prod. 15: 215–227.Google Scholar
Hinks, C. E. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1973. A note on the prediction of carcass composition in beef cattle. Anim. Prod, (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutttngh, H. C. 1962. Developmental changes in beef steers as influenced by fattening, age and type of ration. J. agric. Set, Camb. 58: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1964. The relationship between growth and carcass quality in cattle and sheep. A review. Exp. J. Agric. 32: 191–204.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1970a. Beef production from grazing and silage with autumn-born calves. 1. The influence of grazing intensity on efficiency of herbage utilization and live-weight gain of cattle. Anim. Prod. 12: 433–442.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1970b. Beef production from grazing and silage with autumn-born calves. 2. The effects on the performance of cattle fed on silage of barley supplementation and of previous grazing. Anim. Prod. 12: 443–450.Google Scholar