Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:39:28.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lipid mobilization in pigs selected for leanness or fatness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. Standal
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, The Agricultural University of Norway, 1432 Aas-NLH, Norway
E. Vold
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, The Agricultural University of Norway, 1432 Aas-NLH, Norway
O. Trygstad
Affiliation:
Institute of Pediatric Research, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
Irene Foss
Affiliation:
Institute of Pediatric Research, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
Get access

Summary

Lipid mobilization was investigated in pigs selected for high and low backfat thickness for four generations. Both epinephrine and pituitary lipid mobilizing factors (LMF) induced in vitro lipolysis in pig fat. The release of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) from fat pads sampled from the group selected for thin backfat, the control group, and the group selected for thick backfat differed significantly, the means being 1·16 ± 0·18, 0·83 ± 0·06 and 0·40 ± 0·04 μmol/100 mg per 3 hr respectively.

The inhibition by pig serum from the same groups of an LMF- induced adipokinesis in rabbits also differed significantly. The mean NEFA concentrations were, in the same sequence, 5·05 ± 0·15, 3·35 ± 0·27 and 1·29 ± 0·11 milliequiv/litre respectively. A difference in feeding level of about 20% between 25 and 90 kg live weight did not influence lipid mobilization in vitro.

The serum inhibition method may be a useful aid to early selection for leanness, since it appears that the method may be used for pigs 5 to 6 weeks old.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Breirem, K. and Homb, T. 1972. Energy requirements for growth. In Handbuch der Tiererndhrung Band II, p. 573. Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.Google Scholar
Rudman, D. 1965. The adipokinetic property of hypophyseal peptides. Ergebn. Physiol. 56: 297327.Google Scholar
Rudman, D., Malkin, M. F., Garcia, L. A., Di Girolamo, M. and Abell, L. L. 1964. Inactivation of the adipokinetic property of adrenocorticotropin B-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, vasopressin and pituitary fraction H by tissue of the rat and rabbit. Endocrinology, 75: 867876.Google Scholar
Standal, N. 1967. Preliminary results from a selection experiment with pigs. Proc. NHF-Congr., Copnh., 1967, pp. 98101.Google Scholar
Trygstad, O. 1968. The lipid-mobilizing effect of some pituitary gland preparations. III. A purified human pituitary lipid-mobilizing factor (LMF) with hyperglycaemic activity. Acta endocr., Copnh. 58: 277294.Google Scholar
Trygstad, O. and Foss, I. 1967. Inhibition by human serum of the adipokinetic effect of a human pituitary lipid mobilizing factor (LMF) in rabbits. Acta endocr., Copnh. 56: 649660.Google ScholarPubMed
Trygstad, O. and Foss, I. 1972. Inhibition by human serum of the adipokinetic effect of a human pituitary lipid-mobilizing factor. Acta endocr. Copnh. In press.Google ScholarPubMed