Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T09:53:28.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of draught cattle (Bos indicus) and buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) carting loads in hot conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Anne Pearson
R. Anne Pearson
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG
Get access

Abstract

Two pairs of cattle and two pairs of buffaloes carted loads, in wooden wheeled local carts, 16 to 17 km over the same flat route on village tracks. One team worked each day in temperatures of 24 to 37°C for a total of 6 days per team.

Body temperature, respiration rate and stepping rate in one animal from each pair and work done and distance travelled were monitored.

Buffaloes and cattle started work at speeds of 1 m/s or more. Cattle kept this up for most of the day whereas the buffaloes showed a steady decrease in speed over the day to speeds of less than 0·9 m/s in the last hour. Body temperature of the buffaloes increased during work. By 3-5 h, increases of up to 3·5°C in starting values could be seen. It was necessary to stop and let the buffaloes wallow for at least 20 min to allow them to cool off before they would continue to work. During wallowing body temperature decreased to or below values seen at the start of the day's work. Unlike the buffaloes, the cattle showed changes of less than 1°C in body temperature during work. Respiration rates of buffaloes increased at least two-fold as they began panting usually after 1·5 to 2·5 h. Respiration rates of the cattle could also increase up to three-fold during work. The results have shown that in well fed animals there is little to choose between buffaloes and oxen in daily work output. Estimated daily energy expenditures by the buffaloes and cattle on working days were similar, 1·75 to 1·79 and 1·74 to 1·78 × maintenance, respectively. However, buffaloes usually took longer to achieve the work, as time had to be allowed for wallowing. This is seen as the main disadvantage of using buffaloes for carting on longer routes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 355 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chikamune, T. 1987. Energy-saving characteristics of buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 6: 28–34.Google Scholar
Chikamune, T. and Shimizu, H. 1985. Covering of body trunks of swamp buffaloes with white cloth; effects on thermoregulatory responses. Buffalo Journal 1: 19–27.Google Scholar
Cockrill, W. R. 1974. The working buffalo. In The Husbandry and Health of the Domestic Buffalo (ed. Cockrill, W. R.), pp. 313–328. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E., Badreldin, A. L. and Shafei, M. M. 1955. Skin structure of Egyptian buffaloes and cattle with particular reference to sweat glands. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 46: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. and Waterhouse, D. 1987. Utilization of a poor quality diet by swamp buffalo and cattle. 2nd International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. 1985. A review of nutrient requirements of draught oxen. In Draught Animal Power for Production (ed. Copland, J. W.), ACIAR Proceedings Series no. 10, pp. 59–68. ACIAR, Canberra.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. 1973. Heat tolerance of Brahman cross, buffalo, Banteng and Shorthorn steers during exposure to sun and as a result of exercise. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullick, D. N. 1960. Effect of humidity and exposure to sun on the pulse rate, respiration rate, rectal temperature and haemoglobin level in different sexes of cattle and buffalo. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 54: 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1981. The water buffalo, new prospects for an under-utilised animal. Report of an ad hoc panel of the Advisory Committee on Technical Innovation. Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Commission on International Relations, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Pearson, R. A., Lawrence, P. R. and Ghimire, C. 1989. Factors influencing the work done by draught oxen: a study in the eastern hills of Nepal. Animal Production 49: 345–353.Google Scholar
Pieterson, R. and Ffoulkes, D. 1988. Thermoregulatory responses in working buffalo with and without covers of wet hessian sacking. DAP Project Bulletin 5: 23–28.Google Scholar
Prucsasri, P. 1983. Comparative studies on physiological responses between swamp buffalo and cattle. National Buffalo Research and Development Centre Annual Report, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Rana, R. D., Singh, N., Galhotra, M. M., Nangia, O. P. and Ahmad, A. 1978. Physiological response to exercise in buffalo-males. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 31: 338–340.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, R. C. and Rao, M. V. N. 1985. Responses of buffaloes to heavy working load under tropical conditions. Livestock Production Science 13: 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar