Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:51:33.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eradication of endemic Brachyspira pilosicoli infection from a farrowing herd: a case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

M. Fossi*
Affiliation:
National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Regional Laboratory in Seinäjoki, Saarentaus, Finland
M. Heinonen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Saarentaus, Finland
T. Pohjanvirta
Affiliation:
National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Regional Laboratory in Kuopio, Saarentaus, Finland
S. Pelkonen
Affiliation:
National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Regional Laboratory in Kuopio, Saarentaus, Finland
O.A.T. Peltoniemi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Saarentaus, Finland
*
*National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Regional Laboratory in Seinäjoki, Box 198, 60101 Seinäjoki, Finland. E-mail: marja.fossi@eela.fi

Abstract

Brachyspira pilosicoli and B. innocens were isolated repeatedly from a herd of 60 sows which mostly produced feeder pigs but also raised some fattening pigs. Postweaning diarrhea had been a severe problem in this herd for years. The B. pilosicoli eradication plan was based on the general guidelines for elimination of B. hyodysenteriae, with some modifica-tions. The eradication measures were run in August 1997. In-feed medication with 200p.p.m. tiamulin lasted for 18–30 days, depending on the age group. The piggery unit was emptied, cleaned, disinfected and dried, and all worn surfaces were repaired. The animals were removed to temporary sheds situated 0–100m from the piggery unit. Only the sows and the boar returned to the piggery unit. All other pigs were sold from the sheds within 3 months after the eradication. Immediately after the eradication, the clinical postweaning diarrhea disappeared. The success of the program was monitored four times bacteriologically, and the last control sampling was in December 1999, 7 months after the total withdrawal of antimicrobial feed additives. The primary cultures from the last three samplings were also analysed with B. pilosicoli-specific PCR. All the samples were negative for B. pilosicoli. However, B. innocens could be isolated from each batch of samples. The analysis of B. inno-cens isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis indicated that at least one genotype persisted in the herd. The clinical and laboratory findings suggest that the eradication of B. pilosicoli had succeeded in this herd

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (1998). Animal diseases in Finland 1997. Report. Veterinary and Food Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and National Veterinary and Food Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
Atyeo, RF, Oxberry, SL and Hampson, DJ (1996). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for sub-specific differentiation of Serpulina pilosicoli (formerly ‘Anguillina coli’). FEMS Microbiology Letters 141: 7781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhamel, G (1998). Colonic spirochetosis caused by Serpulina pilosicoli . Large Animal Practice 19: 1422.Google Scholar
Fellström, C and Gunnarsson, A (1995). Phenotypical characterization of intestinal spirochaetes isolated from pigs. Research in Veterinary Science 59: 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fellström, C, Pettersson, B, Thomson, J, Gunnarsson, A, Persson, M and Johansson, K-E (1997). Identification of Serpulina species associated with porcine colitis by biochemical analysis and PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35: 462467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fossi, M, Saranpää, T and Rautiainen, E (1999). In vitro sensitivity of the swine Brachyspira species to tiamulin in Finland 1995–1997. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 40: 353356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, M, Fossi, M, Jalli, J-P, Saloniemi, H and Tuovinen, V (2000). Detectability and prevalence of Serpulina species in herds rearing health class feeder pigs in Finland. Veterinary Record 146: 343347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkinson, SR and Wingar, CR (1981). Selective medium for the isolation of Treponema hyodysenteriae . Veterinary Record 24: 384385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leser, TD, Møller, K, Jensen, TK and Jorsal, SE (1997). Specific detection of Serpulina hyodysenteriae and potentially pathogenic weakly β-haemolytic porcine intestinal spirochetes by polymerase chain reaction targeting 23S rDNA. Molecular and Cellular Probes 11: 363372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, AJ, Trott, DJ, Swayne, DE, Oxberry, SL and Hampson, DJ (1997). Genetic and phenotypic characterization of intestinal spirochetes colonizing chickens and allocation of known pathogenic isolates to three distinct genetic groups. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35: 412417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McOrist, S (1997). Enteric diseases: porcine proliferative enteropathies. Pig Journal Proceedings Section 39: 7476.Google Scholar
Møller, K (1999). Enteric diseases: an enemy of many origins. Pig Progress 06: 411.Google Scholar
Møller, K, Jensen, TK, Jorsal, SE, Leser, TD and Carstensen, B (1998). Detection of Lawsonia intracellularis, Serpulina hyo-dysenteriae, weakly beta-haemolytic intestinal spirochaetes, Salmonella enterica, and haemolytic Escherichia coli from swine herds with and without diarrhoea among growing pigs. Veterinary Microbiology 62: 5972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, LD (1996). Enhanced isolation of Serpulina hyodysente-riae by using sliced agar media. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34: 29372941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxberry, SL, Trott, DJ and Hampson, DJ (1998). Serpulina pilosi-coli, waterbirds and water: potential sources of infections for humans and other animals. Epidemiology and Infection 121: 219225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayment, SJ, Barrett, SP and Livesley, MA (1997). Sub-specific differentiation of intestinal spirochaete isolates by macrorestriction fragment profiling. Microbiology 143: 29232929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rønne, H and Szancer, J (1990). In vitro susceptibility of Danish field isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae to chemothera-peutics in swine dysentery (SD) therapy. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, Lausanne, Switzerland, p. 126.Google Scholar
Thomson, JR, Smith, WJ and Murray, BP (1998). Investigations into field cases of porcine colitis with particular reference to infection with Serpulina pilosicoli. Veterinary Record 142: 235239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trott, DJ, Mikosza, ASJ, Combs, BG, Oxberry, SL and Hampson, DJ (1998). Population genetic analysis of Serpulina pilosi-coli and its molecular epidemiology in villages in the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 48: 659668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuovinen, VK (2000). The pig producers of Lihakunta got rid of contagious diseases – daily weight gain improved 9 per cent and profit 50 FIM (9 USD) per pig. Maatilan Pellervo Jan.: 21–22.Google Scholar
Tuovinen, VK, Heinonen, M and Suutari, E (1997). LSO 2000 quality chain produces non-medicated pork. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress in Animal Hygiene Helsinki, Finland, pp. 180183.Google Scholar