Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T08:58:09.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The design of randomized controlled trials of veterinary vaccines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Ian R. Dohoo*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Management, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, C1A 4P3, Canada
*

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials of veterinary vaccines are essential if we are to have a reasonable understanding of how those vaccines can be expected to perform when used in the field. This manuscript reviews a few (but certainly not all) of the key elements that need to be considered in the design of veterinary vaccine trials. The first step in the design of such a trial is to have a clear statement of the objective of the trial that reflects what is expected of the vaccine (e.g. should it minimize clinical disease or does it need to prevent infection?). Because domestic animals are often managed in groups, the ‘unit of concern’ used in a vaccine trial becomes of great importance. Whether the trial should be carried out at the individual or group level will depend on the objectives of the trial and the extent of concern about ‘group effects’ affecting the trial. Sample sizes will also be influenced heavily by the choice of unit of concern and the nature of the primary outcome being assessed. Finally, while there is no easy solution (except to conduct group-level trials, which may be logistically impossible), the potential for group effects to influence the trial outcome must be considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dohoo, IR, Martin, SW and Stryhn, H (2003). Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Charlottetown: AVCGoogle Scholar
Dohoo, IR and Montgomery, ME (1996). A field trial to evaluate a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine: effects on lung lesions and growth rates in swine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 37: 299302.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, SB (2002). Design of randomized trials. Epidemiologic Reviews 24: 411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavori, PW and Kelsey, J (2002). Introduction and overview (clinical trials). Epidemiologic Reviews 24: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinert, CL (1986). Clinical Trials: Design, Conduct and Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S (1997). Clinical Trials: A Methodological Perspective. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Royston, P and Babiker, A (2002). A menu driven facility for complex sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials with a survival or binary outcome. Stata Journal 2: 151163.Google Scholar
Wittes, J (2002). Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials. Epidemiologic Reviews 24: 3953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed