Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T21:17:13.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphometrical and production traits of Bengal sheep in West Bengal, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2015

Sandip Banerjee
Sandip Banerjee*
Affiliation:
School of Animal and Range Sciences, Hawassa University, Ethiopia
*
Correspondence to: S. Banerjee, B-1/87, Kalyani, Nadia West Bengal, 741235, India. emails: sansoma2003@yahoo.co.in, sansoma2003@gmail.com
Get access

Summary

The study was conducted to phenotypically characterize the Bengal (Desi) sheep in some purposively selected villages of Nadia and Murshidabad districts of West Bengal, India. The Bengal sheep is reared as mutton sheep and has not been studied or characterized. Qualitative (coat colour and tail type) and quantitative (height at withers, height at rump, chest circumference, paunch girth, oblique body length, head length, head width, ear length, horn length, shoulder width, ear width, pelvic width, canon length, length of the fore leg, length of the hind leg, fore canon circumference, neck circumference, neck length, body weight) traits were included in the study. Phenotypic traits indicated that the sheep is of a small, thin tailed type adapted to grazing in water logged areas and lowly to moderately prolific. The structural indices indicate that the sheep is forward aligned, robust and rectangular in shape; it is well balanced and adapted for humid climates. The wool is coarse and hairy type, used for making blankets and durries. The reproductive parameters indicate that the age at first service was 295 days for ewes and 252 days for rams while the age at first lambing averaged around 425 days. Conservation efforts and genetic characterization are needed to maintain the breed purity and further studies regarding the carcass and mutton quality traits need to be carried out

Résumé

L’étude a été menée dans le but de caractériser phénotypiquement les moutons du Bengale (Desi) dans certains villages sélectionnés intentionnellement dans les districts de Nadia et Murshidabad en Bengale Occidental, Inde. Les moutons du Bengale sont élevés pour sa viande et n'ont pas été étudiés ou caractérisés. Cette étude comprend aussi bien des paramètres qualitatifs (couleur de la robe et type de queue) que quantitatifs (hauteur au garrot, hauteur à la croupe, périmètre thoracique, tour du ventre, longueur latérale du corps, longueur et largeur de la tête, longueur des oreilles, longueur des cornes, largeur des épaules, largeur des oreilles, largeur du bassin, longueur des canons, longueur des pattes avant et arrière, tour des canons antérieurs, tour et longueur du cou, poids corporel). D'après les paramètres phénotypiques, il s'agit de moutons de petite taille à queue fine adaptés au pâturage dans des zones inondées et avec une prolificité moyenne – faible. Les indices structuraux révèlent que les moutons présentent un corps nivelé, dirigé vers l'avant, de constitution robuste et forme rectangulaire. Ce sont des animaux équilibrés et adaptés aux climats humides. La laine, grossière et avec des mèches, est utilisée pour la confection de couvertures et tapis. D'après les paramètres reproductifs, l’âge à la première saillie a été de 295 jours pour les brebis et de 252 jours pour les béliers alors qu'en moyenne l’âge à la première mise bas a été d'environ 425 jours. Les efforts de conservation et de caractérisation génétique s'avèrent nécessaires pour maintenir la pureté de la race. En outre, il faudra mener, dans le futur, des études d’évaluation de la qualité de la carcasse et de la viande.

Resumen

El estudio fue llevado a cabo con el fin de caracterizar fenotípicamente el ganado ovino Bengala (Desi) en algunos pueblos seleccionados intencionadamente en los distritos de Nadia y Murshidabad en Bengala Occidental, India. El ganado ovino Bengala se cría por su carne y no ha sido estudiado o caracterizado. En este estudio se incluyeron parámetros cualitativos (color de la capa y tipo de cola) y cuantitativos (altura a la cruz, altura a la grupa, circunferencia torácica, contorno de la panza, longitud lateral del cuerpo, longitud y anchura de la cabeza, longitud de las orejas, longitud de los cuernos, anchura entre espaldas, anchura de las orejas, anchura de la pelvis, longitud de las cañas, longitud de las patas delanteras y traseras, circunferencia de las cañas delanteras, circunferencia y longitud del cuello, peso corporal). Los rasgos fenotípicos indicaron que se trata de ovejas de pequeño tamaño con cola fina adaptadas al pastoreo en áreas inundadas y con una prolificidad media-baja. Los índices estructurales muestran que las ovejas presentan un cuerpo nivelado dirigido hacia delante con constitución robusta y forma rectangular. Son animales equilibrados y adaptados a los climas húmedos. La lana, basta y con mechones, se utiliza para la confección de mantas y alfombras. De acuerdo con los parámetros reproductivos, la edad al primer servicio fue de 295 días para las ovejas y de 252 días para los carneros mientras que la edad media al primer parto rondó los 425 días. Los esfuerzos para la conservación y la caracterización genética son necesarios para mantener la pureza de la raza. Asimismo, son precisos futuros estudios que evalúen parámetros de calidad de la canal y de la carne.

Keywords

Bengal sheepmorphometrical characterizationreproductionstructural indices wool qualityWest BengalIndiamoutons du Bengalecaractérisation morphométriqueindices structurauxqualité de la lainereproductionBengale OccidentalIndeganado ovino Bengalacaracterización morfométricaíndices estructuralescalidad de la lanareproducciónBengala OccidentalIndia
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 57 , December 2015 , pp. 57 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, G. L. H. 1999. The development of a system of linear measurements to provide an assessment of type and function of beef cattle. Anim. Genet. Resour. Inf., 25: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, M. R., Mostofa, M., Islam, M. N. & Asgar, M. A. 2010. Effects of neem, betel leaf, devil's tree, jute and turmeric against gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. J. Bangladesh Agric. Univ., 8(2): 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, C. L. & Garg, G. C. 1997. Sheep Production and Breeding. Lucknow, India, International Book Distributing Company, p. 198.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. 2003. Studies on some economic traits of Garole sheep of West Bengal. Department of Animal Sciences, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India. (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. 2009. Utilisation of Garole sheep wool: a step towards the alleviation of poverty. Anim. Genet. Resour. Inf., FAO, 45: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. 2012. Morphological characterization of indigenous chickens of Sikkim and West Bengal, India. Anim. Genet. Resour., 51: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. 2013. Morphological traits of duck and geese breeds of West Bengal, India. Anim. Genet. Resour., 52: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. & Banerjee, S. 2000. Garole sheep of Bengal. Asian Livest., 24: 19–21.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. & Banerjee, S. 2004. Zinc deficiency in Garole sheep in West Bengal. Indian Vet. J., 81(2): 163–165.Google Scholar
Banerjee, R., Mandal, P. K., Bose, S., Banerjee, M. & Manna, B. 2009. Quality evaluation of meat, skin and wool from Garole sheep- a promising breed from India. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 3(2): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S., Sonali, S., Uday Bahnu, R. & Soma, B. 2005. Utilization of some commonly available medicinal herbs by small ruminants grazing in saline region of West Bengal. Indian J. Field Vet., 1(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Galloway, S. M. & Davis, G. H. 2011. Distribution of prolific Garole sheep in West Bengal, India. Anim. Genet. Resour., 48: 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIS 1989. In: Handbook of Textile Testing-I (fiber diameter:IS:744:1977, Crimps:IS:6124:1971, Staple length:IS:6653:1972, Scouring yield:IS:1349:1964) Manak Bhawan, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. 2010. The Black Bengal Goat as a Tool to Sustainable Livelihoods in Rural West Bengal, Case study #7-10 of the program: “Food Policy for Developing Countries: The Role of Government in the Global Food System”. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Boettcher, P. J., Ajmone-Marsan, P. & Lenstra, J. A. 2010. Recent developments in the genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Leipzig, 1–6 August 2010 (accessed on 10th February 2015), (available at: http://www.kongressband.de/wcgalp2010/assets/pdf/0054.pdf)Google Scholar
Bose, S., Duttagupta, R. & Maitra, D. N. 1999. Phenotypic characterization and management practices of Bengal sheep. Indian J. Small Ruminants, 15: 18–22.Google Scholar
Bronson, F. H. 1989. Mammalian reproductive biology. Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press. pp. 51–52.Google Scholar
Charray, J., Humbert, J. M. & Leif, J. 1992. Manual of sheep production in the humid tropics of Africa. U.K., CAB International.Google Scholar
Concepta, M. M., Sandra, A. S., Joaquim, A. da S., Helder, L., Urbano, G., Pinto, de A., José, R., Bezerra, S. & Arthur, da S. M. 2008. Body indices for the Pantaneirohorse. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci., 45(5): 362–370.Google Scholar
Dagur, R. S. 1996. Clean Wool Yield. Special Training Course on Wool and Wool Products, Development and Evaluation. 12th August’–9th September’ 1996. Avikanagar, Rajasthan, CSWRI.Google Scholar
DARAH 2006a. 17th All India livestock census, agriculture implements and machinery, fishery statistics, Murshidabad, District Report, Vol-1. Government of West Bengal, India.Google Scholar
DARAH 2006b. 17th All India livestock census. agriculture implements and machinery, fishery statistics, Nadia, District Report, Vol-1. Government of West Bengal, India.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K., Singh, M. K., Reddy, B. S. & Singh, N. 2013. Shrinking pastures and grazing lands: a concern to small livestock holders. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 26: 231.Google Scholar
Edilberto, C., Fernando, M., Francisco, V., Samuel, R. P., Eliecer, P. & Concepta, M. 2011. Morphological measurements and body indices for Cuban Creole goats and their crossbreds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40(8): 1671–1679.Google Scholar
Erenstein, O., Thorpe, W., Singh, J. & Varma, A. 2007. Crop-Livestock Interactions and Livelihoods in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. A Regional Synthesis. Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT.Google Scholar
FAO 2012. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 11. Rome.Google Scholar
FAO 2015. Coping with climate change – the roles of genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome.Google Scholar
Forcada, F. & Abecia, J.-A. 2006. The effect of nutrition on the seasonality of reproduction in ewes. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 46(4): 355–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, A. 2008. Ethnomedicinal plants used in West Rarrh region of West Bengal. Nat. prod. Radiance, 7(5): 461–465.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, C. A. & Morleymohanlal, G. 1985. Livestock and Poultry Enterprises for RuralDdevelopment. New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., p. 636.Google Scholar
Hassan, M. R. & Talukder, M. A. I. 2011. Comparative performance of different regional native sheep of Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Vet., 28(2): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macjowski, J. & Zieba, J. 1982. Genetics and Animal Breeding Part-A. Biological and Genetic Foundations of Animal Breeding. Elsevier Scientific Publications Co. PWN. Warszawa, Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. 30–37.Google Scholar
Marković, B., Marković, M. & Radonjić, D. 2012. The morphometrical characteristics of indigenous sheep strain named Sora. In: Proc. of the first Int. Symp. on Animal Science., Zemun- Belgrade, Serbia, 8–10 November 2012, 57–64.Google Scholar
Muhammad, J. K., Asad, A., Mazhar, A., Muhammad, N., Muhammad, S. A. & Majid, H. S. 2012. Factors affecting wool quality and quantity in sheep. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11(73): 13761–13766.Google Scholar
Pan, S. & Sahoo, A. K. 2003. Garolesheep. Report of ad-hoc research scheme on survey evaluation of Garole sheep in Sunderban Area of West Bengal. Mohanpur, West Bengal, WBUAFS.Google Scholar
Pan, S., Sahoo, A. K., Tantia, M. S. & Ahlawat, S. P. S. 2004. Garole sheep NATP (MM) on Animal Genetic Resource Biodiversity. Mohanpur and Kolkata, West Bengal, WBUAFS and Karnal, Haryana, NBAGR.Google Scholar
Pervage, S., Ershaduzzaman, M., Talukder, M. A. I., Hasan, M. N. & Khandoker, M. A. M. Y. 2009. Phenotypic characteristics of indigenous sheep of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci., 38(1&2): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokhrana, A. K., Arora, R. K., Chatterjee, R. & Ramamurthy, T. N. 1974. Development of sampling procedures and standardization of experimental techniques for possessing wool quality. Annual Report CSWRI. Avikanagar, Rajasthan, pp. 78–79.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. J. D. & Bryant, M. J. 2003. Seasonality of reproduction in sheep. Small Ruminant Res., 48: 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SA PPLPP 2011. Small Ruminant rearing “Product Markets, Opportunities and Constraints”. SA PPLPP (available at: http://sapplpp.org/copyright) (accessed 4th August 2013).Google Scholar
Saddullah, M. 2000. Animal based smallholding farms in developing countries with special reference to Bangladesh. J. Int. Dev. Cooperation, 6(1): 23–33.Google Scholar
Sagar, R. L. & Biswas, A. 2008. Constraints in Garole sheep rearing in Sunderbans: Farmers’ perception. Indian J. Small Ruminants, 14(1): 89–92.Google Scholar
Sahana, G., Gupta, S. C. & Nivsarkar, A. E. 2001. Garole: the prolific Sheep of India. Anim. Genet. Resources Inf. FAO Rome, 31: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salim, H. M., Sahahjalal, M., Tareque, A. M. M. & Kabir, F. 2002. Effects of concentrate supplementation on growth and reproductive performance of female sheep and goats under grazing condition. Pak. J. Nutr., 1(4): 91–193.Google Scholar
Scaramuzzi, R. J. & Martin, G. B. 2008. The importance of interactions among nutrition, seasonality and socio-sexual factors in the development of hormone-free methods for controlling fertility. Reprod. Domestic Anim. Spec. Issue: 16th Int. Congress Anim. Reprod., 43(2): 129–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, R. C., Arora, A. L., Narula, H. K. & Singh, R. N. 1999. Characteristics of Garole sheep in India. Anim. Genet. Resour. Inf., 26: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. L. & Purvis, I. W. 2009. Genetic variation in clean wool colour in fine wool Merinos. Proc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Gen., 18: 390–393.Google Scholar
Sohail, A., Muhammad, S. K. & Muhammad, F. U. K. 2010. Factors affecting wool characteristics of Kari sheep in Pakistan. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 34(6): 485–492.Google Scholar
SPSS 2003. Statistical package for social sciences. SPSS 12.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL, SPSS Inc..Google Scholar
Szabolcs, B., Nagy, B., Nagy, L., Kiss, B., Polgár, P. J. & Szabó, F. 2007. Comparison of body measurements of beef cows of different breeds. Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf, 50(4): 363–373.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S. 1968. Time taken to mature in relation to mature weight for sexes, strains and species of domesticated mammals and birds. Anim. Prod., 10: 157–169.Google Scholar
Ungerfeld, R. & Bielli, A. 2012. Seasonal and social factors affecting reproduction. In González-Bulnes, A., & Astiz, S., eds. ”Livestock reproduction: bovine, swine, and ruminants” Encyclopaedia of life support systems (EOLSS). (available at: www.eolss.net) (accessed 07th August 2013).Google Scholar
Villalba, J. J. & Landau, S. Y. 2012. Host behavior, environment and ability to self-medicate. Small Ruminant Res., 103: 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, J. J., Provenza, F. D., Hall, J. O. & Lisonbee, L. D. 2010. Selection of tannins by sheep in response to gastrointestinal nematode infection. J. Anim. Sci., 88: 2189–2198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viroji Rao, S. T., Thammi Raju, D. & Ravindra Reddy, Y. 2008. Adoption of sheep husbandry practices in Andhra Pradesh, India. Volume 20, Article #107. Retrieved August 4, 2013, (available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/7/raju20107.htm).Google Scholar
von Bergen, W. 1963. Wool handbook Vol. I. J. P. Sterens and Co. Inc. Inter-science Pub. London, New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wuletaw, Z., Ayalew, W. & Soelkner, J. 2008. The Mahibere-Silassie composite: a new cattle breed type in north-western Ethiopia. Ethiopian J. Anim. Prod., 8(1): 39–51.Google Scholar
Yadav, D. K., Jain, A., Kulkarni, V. S., Govindaiah, M. G., Aswathnarayan, T. & Sadana, D. K. 2013. Classification of four ovine breeds of southernpeninsular zone of India: morphometric study using classical discriminant function analysis. Springer Plus, 2(29), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed