No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Proband Concordance vs. Casewise Concordance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS000156600000711X/resource/name/firstPage-S000156600000711Xa.jpg)
- Type
- Letter to the Editor
- Information
- Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 1984 , pp. 579 - 581
- Copyright
- Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984
References
REFERENCES
1.
Allen, G, Hrubec, Z (1979): Twin concordance a more general model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol
28:3–13.Google ScholarPubMed
2.
Gottesman, II, Shields, J (1972): Schizophrenia and genetics. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
3.
Hannah, MC, Hooper, JL, Mathews, JD (1983): Twin concordance for a binary trait. 1. Statistical models illustrated with data on drinking status. Acta Genet Med Gemellol
32:127–137.Google Scholar
4.
Hrubec, Z (1973): The effect of diagnostic ascertainment in twins on the assessment of the genetic factor in disease etiology. Am J Hum Genet
25:15–28.Google ScholarPubMed
5.
Hrubec, Z, Allen, G (1975): Letter to editor, Methods and interpretation of twin concordance data. Am J Hum Genet
27:808–809.Google Scholar
6.
Smith, C (1974): Concordance in twins: methods and interpretations. Am J Hum Genet
26:454–466.Google Scholar