Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-cxxrm Total loading time: 0.417 Render date: 2021-11-30T10:57:07.134Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Developmental Research of Twin's Temperament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Adam P. Matheny Jr.*
Affiliation:
Louisville Twin Study, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Kentucky
*
Louisville Twin Study, Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville KY 40292, USA

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Louisville Twin Study, pairs of 3- and 4-year-old twins were provided with standardized competitive or cooperative tasks in a laboratory setting. Some tasks required a pair of twins to share toys; other fostered a more competitive engagement between the twins. Behavioral ratings identified temperament and social components at both ages, and between the two ages, there were transformations in the links between the components. Parental ratings of the twins' temperament at the same ages were moderately correlated with the laboratory observations, but the pattern of the relations changed from one age to the next. The combined sets of measures were subjected to twin analyses for 43 pairs of twins. The results are discussed in terms of the similarity of MZ and DZ pairs for the dimensions of temperament and the transformations of temperament.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

1.Bell, RQ, Weller, GM, Waldrop, MF (1971): Newborn and preschooler: Organization of behavior and relations between periods. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 36 (1-2, Serial No. 142).Google Scholar
2.Buss, AH, Plomin, R (1984): Temperament: Early developing personality Iraits. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
3.Diamond, S. (1957): Personality and temperament. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
4.Matheny, AP, Dolan, AB (1975): Persons, situations and time: A genetic view of behavioral change in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 11061110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Matheny, AP, Wilson, RS (1981): Developmental tasks and rating scales for the laboratory assessment of social interaction at 3 and 4 years. Psychological Documents 14: 22 (MS 2643).Google Scholar
6.Matheny, AP, Wilson, RS, Dolan, AB, Krantz, JZ (1981): Behavioral contrasts in twinships: Stability and patterns of differences in childhood. Child Development 52: 579588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Matheny, AP, Wilson, RS, Nuss, SM (1984): Toddler temperament: Stability across settings and over ages. Child Development 55: 12001211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McDevitt, SC, Carey, WB (1978): The measurement of temperament in 3-7 year old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 19: 245253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mussen, P, Eisenberg-Berg, N (1977): Roots of caring, sharing, and helping. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
10.Reiss, AJ (1961): Occupations and social status. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
11.Thomas, A, Chess, S (1977): Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
12.Wilson, RS (1979): Analysis of longitudinal data. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 29: 103129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wilson, RS, Brown, AM, Matheny, AP (1971): Emergence and persistence of behavioral differences in twins. Child Development 42: 13811398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Wilson, RS, Matheny, AP (1983): Assessment of temperament in infant twins. Developmental Psychology 19: 172183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wilson, RS, Matheny, AP (1986): Behavior-genetics research in infant temperament: The Louisville Twin Study. In Plomin, R. & Dunn, J. (eds): The study of temperament: Changes, continuities, and challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
You have Access
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Developmental Research of Twin's Temperament
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Developmental Research of Twin's Temperament
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Developmental Research of Twin's Temperament
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *