Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:22:18.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association of Twin Zygosity With the Mean and Variance of Tooth Size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Rosario H. Yap Potter*
Affiliation:
Oral-Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry
Pao-lo Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
Joe C. Christian
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
*
Oral-Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1121 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To search for an association of twin zygosity with tooth size, 56 dental variables measured from 65 pairs of twins (43 MZ, 22 DZ) were studied. Results of the t′ test for equality of the means showed no association of zygosity with any of the variables in males or in females. Results of the F′ test for homogeneity of total variances between zygosities showed evidence for unequal total variances in 15 variables in males and 13 in females. Sex influence was further noted on the association of zygosity with the variance of tooth size. Where total variances were unequal, genetic variance estimates differed when only the within-pair mean squares were used and when combined estimates designed to be unbiased by differences in environmental variances were used.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1.Boklage, CE, Elston, RC, Potter, RH (in press): Cellular origins of functional asymmetries: Evidence from schizophrenia, handedness, fetal membranes and teeth in twins. In Gruzelier, J, Flor-Henry, P (eds): “Hemisphere Asymmetry of Function and Psychopathology.” New York: Elsevier-North Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
2.Christian, JC, Kang, KW, Norton, JA Jr (1974): Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am J Hum Genet 26:154161.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Christian, JC, Norton, JA Jr (1977): A proposed test of the difference between the means of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:4953.Google Scholar
4.Christian, JC (1978): The use of twin registers in the study of birth defects. Birth Defects: Original Article Series 14:167178.Google Scholar
5.Havlik, R, Garrison, R, Fabsitz, R, Feinleib, M (1977): Genetic variability of clinical chemical values. Clin Chem 23:659662.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Kempthorne, O, Osborne, RH (1961): The interpretation of twin data. Am J Hum Genet 13:320339.Google Scholar
7.Potter, RH, Boklage, CE (1979): The twin method in genetic studies: Some developmental problems. J Dent Res 58A:375.Google Scholar
8.Reed, T, Sprague, FR, Kang, KW, Nance, WE, Christian, JC (1975): Genetic analysis of dermatoglyphic patterns in twins. Hum Hered 25:263275.Google Scholar