Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T07:07:12.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Russian Orthodox Church and the Provisional Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2018

John Shelton Curtiss
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The close ties between the Russian Orthodox Church and the government of the Tsar are well known, and need not be treated here. These bonds remained intact down to the Revolution of February (Old Style), 1917. Strangely enough, however, in spite of the ties between them, the central organization of the Church did nothing to help the government when its hour was come. Indeed, the Synod was very careful not to commit itself too far, for on February 27 it rejected the proposal of Raev, the Over Procurator, to condemn the “liberation movement.” According to a leading Church periodical, the Synod told Raev that “it is a moot question whether the treason comes from above or from below.”

Type
Articles
Information
American Slavic and East European Review , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 1948 , pp. 237 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Titlinov, B. B., Cerkov' vo vremja revoljucii (Petrograd, 1924), p. 55.Google Scholar The author was a liberal professor at the Petrograd Theological Academy.

2 Kandidov, B., Cerkov' i fevral'skaja revoljucija (Moscow, 1934), p. 18.Google Scholar While Kandidov is a leading Soviet antireligious writer, his work is carefully documented. In a number of instances where it has been possible to verify his citations, they have proven entirely correct, so that the evidence he presents appears to be reliable.

3 Ibid., p. 19.

4 A. Pešekhonov, Pervye nedeli, printed in Alekseev, S. A., comp., Fevral'skaja revoljucija (Moscow, Leningrad), 1925, p. 451.Google Scholar

6 Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 19–20.Google Scholar.

7 Protopresbyter Šavel'skij, Georgij, “Cerkov' i revoljucija,” Russkaja mysl' (April, 1922), pp. 111-12.Google Scholar

8 Bljumental', I. I., Revoljucija 1917-1918 gg. v Samarskoj Gubernii (Samara, 1927), I, 71, 78, 99, 166, 168, 241.Google Scholar

9 Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 22–25 Google Scholar; Reč Petrograd, March 8, 1917.

10 Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 24–25.Google Scholar Archbishop Sergij was one of the liberal churchmen; he had been a foe of Rasputin. After the death of Patriarch Tikhon he became Patriarchal Locum Tenens, and in 1943 was named Patriarch.

11 Šavel'skij, , op. cit., pp. 108-9Google Scholar; Titlinov, , op. cit., pp. 74–78 Google Scholar; Reč , March 7 and 8, 1917; Birževaja vedomosti, Petrograd, March 11, 1917.

12 Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 37–38.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., pp. 38-39; Titlinov, , op. cit., pp. 76–78 Google Scholar.

14 Titlinov, , op. cit., pp. 79–80.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., pp. 80-82.

16 Dejanija svjaščennago sobora pravoslavnoj rossijskoj cerkvi, II, No. 2, 190-93.

17 Vvedenskij, A., Cerkov' i gosudarstvo (Moscow, 1923), pp. 32–33.Google Scholar Vvedenskij had been a liberal for some time, and in 1922 he was one of the leaders in the Renovationist movement in the Church that caused a split enduring until 1944. His statements of fact regarding 1917 appear to agree with the other evidence on this period.

18 Ibid., pp. 33-35, 38.

19 šavel'skij, op. cit., p. 108.

20 Dejanija Sobora, II, Part II, 193.

21 Dejanija Sobora, cited in Vvedenskij, , op. cit., pp. 166-67Google Scholar.

22 Titlinov, , op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar

23 Birževaja vedomosti, March 13, 1917.

24 Vvedenskij, , op. cit., pp. 39–42.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., pp. 42-43.

26 Vserossijskij cerkovno-obščestvennyj vestnik. No. 28, p. 4 , quoted in Kandidov, , op. cit., P. 57.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., pp.57-58.

28 Ibid., pp. 13-14.

28 Ibid., pp. 61-62.

30 Vvedenskij, , op. cit., pp. 64–65.Google Scholar

31 Ibid., p. 66.

32 Enišerlov, M et al., Voinstvujuščee bezbožie za 15 Let (Moscow, 1932), p. 283.Google Scholar

33 Titlinov, , op. cit., p. 66 Google Scholar; Vvedenskij, , op. cit., p. 36 Google Scholar.

34 Kandidov, , op. cit., p. 91.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., pp. 91-92.

37 Vvedenskij, , op. cit., p. 34.Google Scholar

36 šavel'skij, , op. cit., p. 108.Google Scholar

38 Vserossijskij cerkovno-obščestvennyj vestnik. No. 95, cited in Vvedenskij, , op. cit., pp. 55–56.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., pp. 44-46.

40 Ibid., pp. 34-36; Titlinov, , op. cit., pp. 67–68.Google Scholar

41 Vvedenskij, , op. cit., pp. 51–53.Google Scholar

42 Ibid pp. 49-50; Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 84–85.Google Scholar

43 Kandidov, , op. cit., pp. 74–75.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p. 73.

45 Ibid., pp. 80-84

46 Ibid., pp. 74-75.

47 Ibid., pp. 43-45.

48 Vvedenskij, , op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar

49 Ibid.