Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:45:40.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interests and Ethics in Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Laura Stoker
Laura Stoker*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine the place of self-interest in political life as given by a conception of politics that invokes ethics. This conception portrays each citizen as an individual with unique hopes and desires who is at the same time joined with others—part of, and continually giving shape to, a shared social and political life. It sees in political diversity and controversy not just conflicting interests but also competing claims about what “we”—unique individuals, linked to particular others through social roles and relationships, and together forming a single citizenry—ought to do or seek. Research that simply adopts a broad conception of utility or interest to admit nonselfish preferences or that employs typologies contrasting self-interested with non-self-interested motives will reveal neither the significance nor the limits of self-interest in this politics. Rather, we must explore how citizens' interests are both championed and challenged by the understandings of “good” and “right” to which our politics gives voice.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 369 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Charles. 1979. “The Place of Principles in Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review 73:711–23.10.2307/1955399Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1967. “Values and Collective Decision-Making.” In Philosophy, Politics, and Society, ser. 3, ed. Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G.. New York:Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt. 1986. “Justification in Ethics.” In Nomos 28: Justification, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1965. Political Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217062.001.0001Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven M.. 1986. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brock, Dan W. 1988. “Paternalism and Autonomy.” Ethics 98:550–65.10.1086/292972Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” Research in Micropolitics 3:1–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97:26–38.10.1086/292815Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1986. Individual Interests and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules, and Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Democracy and Social Choice.” Ethics 97:6–25.10.1086/292814Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1983. The Terms of Political Discourse. 2d ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1974. “Comment: The Status of Nonattitudes.” American Political Science Review 68:650–60.10.2307/1959510Google Scholar
Dagger, Richard. 1986. “Politics and the Pursuit of Autonomy.” In Nomos 28: Justification, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dobel, J. Patrick. 1986. “The Ends of Ethics—the Beginnings of Politics.” In Nomos 28: Justification, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York:Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171694Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1966. The Public Interest. New York:John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1990. “A Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In Beyond Self-interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. 1986. “Subjective Value and Justificatory Political Theory.” In Nomos 28: Justification, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York:New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gautier, David P. 1967. “Morality and Advantage.” Philosophical Review 76:460–75.10.2307/2183283Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1990. “Laundering Preferences.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, ed. Elster, Jon and Hylland, Aanund. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, Scott L.. 1988. “Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective.” American Political Science Review 82:567–76.10.2307/1957401Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael, Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wippler, Reinhard, eds. 1990. Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance, and Effects. New York:de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1970. The Public Interest and Individual Interests. New York:Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400848515Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher. 1990. “Varieties of Altruism.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kalin, Jesse. 1970. “In Defense of Egoism.” In Morality and Rational Self-Interest, ed. Gautier, David. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11(2):129–61.10.1017/S0007123400002544Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1988. “Ideas, Politics, and Public Policies.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J, ed. 1990a. Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1990b. “On the Relation of Altruism and Self-interest.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mans-bridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1971. Values and Conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meilaender, Gilbert C. 1984. The Theory and Practice of Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1988. Principia Ethica. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1988. “Autonomy and Deontology.” In Consequentialism and Its Critics, ed. Scheffler, Samuel. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1987. “Why Some Welfare-State Redistribution to the Poor Is a Great Idea.” In Democracy and Public Choice, ed. Rowley, Charles K.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Parks, Robert Q. 1982. “Interests and the Politics of Choice.” Political Theory 10:547–65.10.1177/0090591782010004005Google Scholar
Pincoffs, Edmund L. 1986. Quandaries and Virtues. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1988. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.” In Consequentialism and Its Critics, ed. Scheffler, Samuel. New York:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rand, Ayn. 1964. The Virtue of Selfishness. New York:New American Library.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert B., ed. 1988. The Power of Public Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 1986. “Values and Preferences.” Ethics 96:301–16.10.1086/292748Google Scholar
Sayre-McMord, Geoffrey, ed. 1988. Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1975. “Preference and Urgency.” Journal of Philosophy 72:655–69.10.2307/2024630Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York:Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1990. “Self-Interest in American's Political Opinions.” In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Earl P., and Speer, Leslie K.. 1979. “Whites' Opposition to ‘Busing’: Self-interest or Symbolic Politics?” American Political Science Review 72:369–84.10.2307/1954885Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Thomas R., and Allen, H. M. Jr., 1980. “Self-Interest Versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74:670–84.10.2307/1958149Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1990. “Rational Fools.” In Beyond Self-interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1981. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura. 1990. Morality and the Study of Political Behavior. Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. “Political Self-interest in Constitutional Law.” In Beyond Self-interest, ed. Mansbridge, Jane J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth W. 1987. Moral and Political Discourse. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., Rasinski, Kenneth A., and Griffin, Eugene. 1986. “Alternative Images of the Citizen.” American Psychologist 41:970–978.10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.970Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1989. “Rights and Majorities: Rousseau Revisited.” Presented at the John M. Olin Conference on Political Behavior and Institutions, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1973. “A Critique of Utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, ed. Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. 1964. “A Paradox in the Theory of Democracy.” In Philosophy, Politics, and Society, set. 2, ed. Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.