No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Influence of Partisanship on Assessments of Promise Fulfillment and Accountability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2024
Abstract
I draw together theories of partisan polarization and motivated reasoning, which suggest that partisanship shapes information processing, and theories of accountability, which argue voters hold elected officials accountable through promise fulfillment. Here, I ask how partisanship influences voter understanding of promise fulfillment and accountability and if voters assess promises through a partisan lens. Two original survey experiments test how respondents react to promise fulfillment on the issues of immigration and human trafficking. I demonstrate that co-partisans differentiate between kept and broken promises, but out-partisans do not. Despite partisan differences, respondents evaluate promise-keeping when asked about accountability but not when asked about approval. Thus, even when voters recognize broken promises, accountability is influenced by partisanship. Immigration, a more polarized issue, is more likely to prime a partisan response than human trafficking, a less polarized issue. Future work must account for partisanship in accountability and what this means for our understanding of fundamental democratic principles.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragones, Enriqueta, Postlewaite, Andrew, and Palfrey, Thomas. 2007. “Political Reputations and Campaign Promises.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (4): 846–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?” Political Psychology 27 (5): 731–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1993. “Can Inattentive Citizens Control Their Elected Representatives?” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 401–16. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Artes, Joaquin. 2011. “Do Spanish Politicians Keep Their Promises?” Party Politics 19 (1): 142–58.Google Scholar
Bayes, Robin, Druckman, James N., Goods, Avery, and Molden, Daniel C.. 2020. “When and How Different Motives can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning.” Political Psychology 41 (5): 1031–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2004. “Issue Ownership in Primary and General Presidential Debates.” Argumentation and Advocacy 40 (3): 143–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, and Risa, Palm. 2019. “Motivated Reasoning and Political Decision Making.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Tabitha. 2021. The Importance of Campaign Promises. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla, Tabitha. 2024. “Replication Data for: The Influence of Partisanship on Assessments of Promise Fulfillment and Accountability.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FW87Y1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Tabitha, Filindra, Alexandra, and Lajevardi, Nazita. 2022. “How Source Cues Shape Evaluations of Group-Based Derogatory Political Messages.” Journal of Politics 84 (4): 1979–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Tabitha, and Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2018. “Bridging the Partisan Divide on Immigration Policy Attitudes through a Bipartisan Issue Area: The Case of Human Trafficking.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5 (2): 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, Tabitha, and Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. 2019. “The Evolution of Human Trafficking Messaging in the United States and its Effect on Public Opinion.” Journal of Public Policy 39 (2): 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouché, Vanessa, Farrell, Amy, and Wittmer-Wolfe, Dana E.. 2018. “Challenging the Dominant Frame: The Moderating Impact of Exposure and Knowledge on Perceptions of Sex Trafficking Victimization.” Social Science Quarterly 99 (4): 1283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G, Gerber, Alan S., and Hill, Seth J.. 2015. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 519–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G., and Lenz, Gabriel. 2019. “Partisan Bias in Surveys.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callander, Steven, and Wilson, Catherine H.. 2008. “Context Dependent Voting and Political Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (3): 565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, James E. 1983. “The Electoral Consequences of Issue Ambiguity: An Examination of the Presidential Candidates’ Issue Positions from 1968 to 1980.” Political Behavior 5 (3): 277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Alexander. 2023. Persuasion in Parallel: How Information Changes Minds about Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander, and McClellan, Oliver A.. 2019. “Validating the Demographic, Political, Psychological, and Experimental Results Obtained from a New Source of Online Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 6 (1): 2053168018822174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert Alan, and Lindblom, Charles Edward. 1953. Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems, Resolved into Basic Processes. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Donovan, Kathleen, Kellstedt, Paul M., Key, Ellen M., and Lebo, Matthew J.. 2020. “Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval.” Political Behavior 42 (4): 1201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2022. “A Framework for the Study of Persuasion.” Annual Review of Political Science 25: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Leeper, Thomas J.. 2012. “Is Public Opinion Stable? Resolving the Micro/Macro Disconnect in Studies of Public Opinion.” Daedalus 141 (4): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Leeper, Thomas J., and Slothuus, Rune. 2018. “Motivated Responses to Political Communications: Framing, Party Cues, and Science Information.” In The Feeling, Thinking Citizen, eds. Howard Levine and Charles S. Taber, 125–50. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Levendusky, Matthew S.. 2019. “What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization?” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (1): 114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Levendusky, Matthew S., and McLain, Audrey. 2018. “No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and McGrath, Mary C.. 2019. “The Evidence for Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Preference Formation.” Nature Climate Change (2): 111–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, E. J., Kostadinova, Petia, and Tafolar, Mine. 2022. “Pledge-Making by US Political Parties: A Longitudinal Study.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Farrell, Amy, Bouché, Vanessa, and Wolfe, Dana. 2019. “Assessing the Impact of State Human Trafficking Legislation on Criminal Justice System Outcomes.” Law & Policy 41 (2): 174–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 563–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishel, Jeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Marc, Cox, John Woodrow, and Hermann, Peter. 2016. “Pizzagate: From Rumor, to Hashtag, to Gunfire in DC.” Washington Post.Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Peyton, Buddy, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2007. “Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, George, Bauer, Martin W., Durant, John, and Allum, Nicholas C.. 1999. “Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the US.” Science 285 (5426): 384–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach, Jacob M. 2022. Laboratories against Democracy: How National Parties Transformed State Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guay, Brian, and Lopez, Jesse. 2021. “Partisan Bias in Bipartisan Places? A Field Experiment Measuring Attitudes toward the Presidential Alert in Real Time.” Public Opinion Quarterly 85 (1): 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Albert C., Edgerly, Stephanie, Akin, Heather, and Broesch, James A.. 2012. “Partisan Evaluation of Partisan Information.” Communication Research 39 (4): 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, Nicklas, and Naurin, Elin. 2016. “Promising Ever More.” Party Politics 22 (3): 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead?: Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc, and Weiler, Jonathan. 2018. Prius or Pickup?: How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America’s Great Divide. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Marc, and Dassonneville, Ruth. 2018. “Explaining the Trump Vote: The Effect of Racist Resentment and Anti-Immigrant Sentiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 528–34.Google Scholar
Hornsey, Matthew J., Harris, Emily A., and Fielding, Kelly S.. 2018. “The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: A 24-Nation Investigation.” Health Psychology 37 (4): 307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyengar, Shanto, and Krupenkin, Masha. 2018. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Political Psychology 39 (S1): 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. 2012. “Partisan Perceptual Bias and the Information Environment.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 672–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Landrum, Asheley, and Winneg, Kenneth. 2017. “Culturally Antagonistic Memes and the Zika Virus: An Experimental Test.” Journal of Risk Research 20 (1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Bruce E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth A., and Westlye, Mark C.. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sung-youn, Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2010. “A Computational Model of the Citizen as Motivated Reasoner: Modeling the Dynamics of the 2000 Presidential Election.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2014a. “Identity and Engagement among Political Independents in America.” Political Psychology 35 (4): 577–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2014b. “Partisanship in a Social Setting.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, and Ryan, John Barry. 2022. “Who Are Leaners? How True Independents Differ from the Weakest Partisans and Why It Matters.” The Forum 20: 155–67.Google Scholar
Kostadinova, Petia. 2013. “Democratic Performance in Post-Communist Bulgaria: Election Pledges and Levels of Fulfillment, 1997–2005.” East European Politics 29 (2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, Petia. 2017. “Party Pledges in the News: Which Election Promises Do the Media Report?” Party Politics 23 (6): 636–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, Petia, and Dimitrova, Daniela V.. 2012. “Communicating Policy Change: Media Framing of Economic News in Post-Communist Bulgaria.” European Journal of Communication 27 (2): 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, Tatiana, and Kostadinova, Petia. 2016. “Party Promises, Voter Understanding, and Mandate Responsiveness in East European Politics.” Politics & Policy 44 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, Arie W. 1989. “The Psychology of Being “Right”: The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 106 (3): 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krukones, Michael G. 1984. Promises and Performance: Presidential Campaigns as Policy Predictors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard G., Johnston, Christopher D., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and “Conflict Extension” in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lebo, Matthew J., and Cassino, Daniel. 2007. “The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval.” Political Psychology 28 (6): 719–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, Thomas J., and Slothuus, Rune. 2014. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation.” Political Psychology 35 (S1): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2013. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2023. “Can Information Persuade Rather than Polarize? A Review of Alex Coppock’s Persuasion in Parallel.” Political Science Quarterly https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2005. “The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26 (3): 455–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S.. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (04): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansergh, Lucy, and Thomson, Robert. 2017. “Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking.” Comparative Politics 39 (3): 311–29.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. ““I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milita, Kerri, Ryan, John Barry, and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2014. “Nothing to Hide, Nowhere to Run, or Nothing to Lose: Candidate Position-Taking in Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N., and Freese, Jeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naurin, Elin. 2009. “Promising Democracy. Parties, Citizens and Election Promises.” PhD diss. Gothenburg University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Naurin, Elin. 2011. Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naurin, Elin. 2014. “Is a Promise a Promise? Election Pledge Fulfilment in Comparative Perspective Using Sweden as an Example.” West European Politics 37 (5): 1046–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. 1976. “The Theory of Political Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 70 (3): 742–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolacci, Gabriele, and Chandler, Jesse. 2014. “Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (3): 184–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétry, François, and Collette, Benoît. 2009. “Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises: A Positive Perspective from Political Science.” In Do They Walk Like They Talk?, ed. Imbeau, Louis M., 65–80. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piere, Sandra, and Selee, Andrew. 2017. “Immigration under Trump: A Review of Policy Shifts in the Year Since the Election.” Policy Brief. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/immigration-under-trump-review-policy-shifts.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1021–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Jacob E., Howat, Adam J., Shafranek, Richard M., and Busby, Ethan C.. 2019. “Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization.” Political Behavior 41 (2): 423–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royed, Terry J. 1996. “Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runde, Daniel F., and Santoro, Jena. 2017. “Trump Administration has a Bipartisan Opportunity to Combat Human Trafficking.” Report. https://www.csis.org/analysis/trump-administration-has-bipartisan-opportunity-combat-human-trafficking.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1972. “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review 66 (2): 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2017. “The 2016 US Election: How Trump Lost and Won.” Journal of Democracy 28 (2): 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinatra, Gale M., Kienhues, Dorothe, and Hofer, Barbara K.. 2014. “Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change.” Educational Psychologist 49 (2): 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens-Dougan, LaFleur. 2020. Race to the Bottom: How Racial Appeals Work in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1999. “Political Parties and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 243–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkin, Tracy. 2009. “Campaign Appeals and Legislative Action.” Journal of Politics 71 (03): 1093–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkin, Tracy. 2011. The Legislative Legacy of Congressional Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Robert, Royed, Terry, Naurin, Elin, Artés, Joaquín, Costello, Rory, Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz, Ferguson, Mark, et al. 2017. “The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timm, Jane C. 2021. “Fact Check: Mexico Never Paid for It. But What about Trump’s Other Border Wall Promises?” NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fact-check-mexico-never-paid-it-what-about-trump-s-n1253983.Google Scholar
Trump, Donald J. 2020. “The Trump Administration Is Committed to Combating Human Trafficking and Protecting the Innocent.” https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/trump-administration-committed-combating-human-trafficking-protecting-innocent/.Google Scholar
Bonilla supplementary material
Bonilla supplementary material
File
233.9 KB
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.