Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:16:27.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert H. Salisbury ,
John P. Heinz ,
Edward O. Laumann  and
Robert L. Nelson
Robert H. Salisbury
Affiliation:
Washington University
John P. Heinz
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Edward O. Laumann
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Robert L. Nelson
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interest-group interactions may be examined in ways comparable to the analysis of conflict and coalition in other areas of political science. We seek to measure and compare the structure of interest-group participation and conflict in four domains of U.S. domestic policy: agriculture, energy, health, and labor. Data are drawn from a survey of 806 representatives of organizations with interests in federal policy, supplemented by interviews with 301 government officials in the same four domains. Several types of data are adduced regarding the intensity and partisanship of group conflict in each domain and the range and variety of group participation. Coalitional patterns are described and the mutual positioning of different kinds of organization—peak-association groups versus more specialized trade, professional, or commodity groups, for example—are examined.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 1217 - 1234
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey. 1977. Lobbying for the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnen, James T. 1980. Observations on the Changing Nature of National Agricultural Policy Decision Process, 1946-76. In Farmers, Bureaucrats, and Middlemen: Historical Perspectives on American Agriculture, ed. Peterson, Trudy Huskamp. Washington: Howard University Press.Google Scholar
Browne, William P. 1986. Lobbyists, Private Interests, and the 1985 Farm Bill. Central Michigan University.Google Scholar
Browne, William P., and Salisbury, Robert H.. 1972. Organized Spokesmen for Cities: Urban Interest Groups. In People and Politics in Urban Society, ed. Hahn, Harlan. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Chubb, John E. 1983. Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy: The Politics of Energy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guither, Harold D. 1980. The Food Lobbyists. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hadwiger, Don F. 1982. The Politics of Agricultural Research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, John Mark. 1985. Congressmen and Interest Groups: The Development of an Agricultural Policy Network in the 1920s. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Knoke, David, and Laumann, Edward O.. 1983. The Social Organization of National Policy Domains: An Exploration of Some Structural Hypotheses. In Social Structure and Network Analysis, ed. Lin, Nan and Marsden, Peter V.. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert, and Salisbury, Robert. 1986. Organizations in Political Action: Representing Interests in National Policy-Making. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Sociological Association, New York.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choices and National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1983. Comment on Manley. American Political Science Review 77:384–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1980. The Organization of Interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., and Salisbury, Robert H.. N.d. Private Representation in Washington: Surveying the Structure of Influence. American Bar Foundation Journal. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 1–32.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1979. Why No Corporatism in America? In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, ed. Schmitter, Philippe and Lehmbruch, Gerhard. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions. American Political Science Review 78:64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattscheider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay L., and Tierney, John T.. 1985. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Andrew. 1984. Sampling Memorandum Describing Procedures Employed in Washington Representatives Project. University of Chicago. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. 1982. The Transformation of American Medicine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1983. The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review 77:390–406.Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham. 1982. Why Is There No Corporatism in the United States? In Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, ed. Lchmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham. 1985. Business and Politics: A Comparative Introduction. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.