Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:02:49.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physician Employment: At-Will Employment Contract Does Not Insulate Employer from Claim Based on Violation of State Public Policy—LoPresti v. Rutland Reg'l Health Servs., Inc.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2021

Kerry Moynihan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Select Recent Court Decisions
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 135 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 No. 2003-222, 2004 WL 2365402 (Vt. Oct. 22, 2004).

2 Id.

3 Id. at 1.

4 Id.

5 Id. at 3-4.

6 Id. at 3.

7 Id. at 1.

8 Id. at 3. LoPresti's contract specified that his employment could be terminated one hundred and eighty days after written notice, “with or without cause from either party to the other.” Id.

9 Id.

10 Id.

11 Id. at 5.

12 Id.

13 520 A.2d 586 (Vt. 1986).

14 Id. at 587-88; see LoPresti, 2004 WL 2365402, at 5.

15 Id.

16 Id.

17 Id.

18 Id.

19 807 A.2d 390 (Vt. 2002).

20 LoPresti, 2004 WL 2365402, at 7.

21 Id. at 8.

22 Id.

23 Id. at 7-8.

24 Id. at 6.

25 Id. at 7.

26 Id.

27 Id. at 11.

28 Id. at 13.

29 Id. at 14.

30 Id. at 7.

31 Id.

32 Id. at 5.

33 Id. at 6.