Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T16:54:28.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2021

Courtney M. Schou
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Select Recent Court Decisions
Information
American Journal of Law & Medicine , Volume 32 , Issue 2-3 , June 2006 , pp. 408 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics and Boston University 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 438 F.3d 1052 (10th Cir. 2006).

2 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-397 (2000); Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1053-54.

3 Id.

4 Id. at 1054.

5 Id.

6 Id.

7 Id.

8 21 U.S.C. §§381(d)(1) and 355(a); Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1054.

9 Id.

10 Id.

11 Id.

12 Id.

13 Id.

14 Id.

15 21 U.S.C. §332(a); Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1054.

16 Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 398 (1946).

17 Id.

18 Id. at 396-99.

19 Mitchell v. Robert De Mario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.S. 288, 291 (1960).

20 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1055 (citing Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc., 516 U.S. 479 (1996)).

21 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1055 (citing Meghrig, 516 U.S. at 487).

22 Id. at 484-88.

23 Id. at 485-86.

24 Id. at 487.

25 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1056-57.

26 Id. at 1058.

27 Porter, 328 U.S. at 398.

28 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1058.

29 Id. (citing 21 U.S.C. § 332(a)).

30 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1058 (citing Mitchell, 361 U.S. at 296); c.f. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. 396 F.3d 1190 (D.C. Cir. 2005)(finding that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) prohibits courts from ordering disgorgement because RICO contains solely forward-looking remedies). The Tenth Circuit concluded that the Philip Morris holding does not affect the present decision since the language the court relied on in RICO is not present in the FDCA. Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1059 (citing Philip Morris, 396 F.3d at 1199).

31 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1058.

32 Id. at 1059.

33 Id.

34 Id. (citing Porter, 328 U.S. at 402)(comparing the remedies present in the FDCA with those present in the EPCA and finding substantial similarities).

35 Rx Depot 438 F.3d at 1059.

36 Id. at 1060.

37 Id. (citing 21 U.S.C. § 360h(b)(2)(C)).

38 Rx Depot, 438 F.3d at 1060.

39 Id. at 1061.

40 Id.

41 Id.

42 Id.

43 Id.

44 Id.; Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chem. Group, Inc., 355 F.3d 345, 354-55 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Carson, 52 F.3d 1173, 1181 (2d Cir. 1995).

45 Philip Morris, 396 F.3d at 1202.