Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:24:57.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States— Final Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Simon Lester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 102 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 834 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Appellate Body Report, United States—Final Anti-dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico, WT/DS344/AB/R (adopted May 20,2008), modifying Panel Report, United States—Final Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico, WT7DS344/R (adopted May 20, 2008) [hereinafter U.S.—Stainless Steel (Mexico)]. Decisions of the panels and Appellate Body are available at <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm>.

2 Panel Report, U.S.—Stainless Steel (Mexico), supra note 1, para. 7.7.

3 Apr. 14, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization [hereinafter WTO Agreement], Annex 1A, in World Trade Organization, The Results of The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts 486 (1995)Google Scholar [hereinafter The Legal Texts].

4 Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, WTO Agreement, supra note 3, Annex 1A, in The Legal Texts, supra note 3, at 168.

5 Appellate Body Report, United States—Laws, Regulations and Methodology for Calculating Dumping Margins (Zeroing), WT/DS294/AB/R (adopted May 9, 2006).

6 Appellate Body Report, United States—Measures Relating to Zeroing and Sunset Reviews, W T/DS322/AB/R (adopted Jan. 23, 2007).

7 The Appellate Body reviews its past findings on zeroing in paragraph 66 of the instant case.

8 See W T O Doc. TN/RL/W/213 (November 30, 2007).

9 See, e.g., W T O Doc. TN/RL/W/214/Rev.2 (December 18, 2007).

10 In this regard, AD Agreement Article 17.6(h) states: “Where the panel finds that a relevant provision of the Agreement admits of more than one permissible interpretation, the panel shall find the authorities’ measure to be in conformity with the Agreement if it rests upon one of those permissible interpretations.”

11 See, e.g., Roger, P. Alford Reflections on US-Zeroing: A Study in Judicial Overreaching by the WTO Appellate Body, 44 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 196 (2006)Google Scholar.