Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T23:45:26.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Twenty-Third Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice and Its Future*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2017

Manley O. Hudson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The close of its twenty-third year finds the Permanent Court of International Justice still in existence, and still in a position to resume its activity if and when the world situation may permit. Its premises in the Peace Palace at The Hague are intact; its President and Registrar carry on their duties from Geneva; and the twelve judges who continue in office are available for the discharge of their functions. The budget of the Court for 1944 was duly alimented and a budget has been adopted for 1945.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 1945 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This is the twenty-third in the writer's series of annual articles on the organization and work of the Permanent Court of International Justice, the publication of which was begun in this Journal in 1923 (Vol. 17, p. 15)

References

1 The present judges are: J. G. Guerrero (Salvadoran), President; Sir Cecil Hurst (British), Vice-President; Rafael Altamira (Spanish), Dionisio Anzilotti (Italian), Antonio Sànchez de Bustamante (Cuban), Cheng Tien-Hsi (Chinese), Rafael Erich (Finnish), W. J. M. van Eysinga (Netherland), Henri Fromageot (French), M. O. Hudson (American), Demétre Negulesco (Romanian), and Charles De Visscher (Belgian). Mr. J. López Oliván (Spanish) is the Registrar

2 The report was printed as a document of 30 pages for special distribution. It was reproduced as a British Parliamentary Paper, Miscellaneous No. 2 (1944), Cmd. 6531. The text is also reproduced in this number of the Journal, Supplement, p. 1.

3 The provision in the existing Statute is only a counsel of perfection, if that it is in fact Negative by other provisions in the existing Statute.

4 The Court's resolutions of 1931 and 1936 were published in Series D, No. 2 (2d addendum), pp. 268, 300; Series E, No. 12, p. 196. See also Charles E. Hughes, in 16 American Bar Association Journal (1930), pp. 151-7; Cecil J. B. Hurst, in 59 Law Quarterly Review (1943), pp. 321-2; Manley 0. Hudson, The Permanent Court of International Justice, 1920 -1942, New York, 1943, p. 579 and ff.

5 Octava Conferencia International Americana, Diario de Sessiones, Lima, 1939, p. 272.

6 E.g., in 222 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (1942), p. 123.

6a International Labor Office, Official Bulletin, Vol. XXVI, p. 194.

7 30 American Bar Association Journal (1944), p. 546.

8 Same, p. 547.

9 94 Law Journal (1944), pp. 341-2. See also H. A. Munro in same, pp. 251-253.

10 Kelsen, , Peace Through Law , Chapel Hill, 1944, pp. 127-48.Google Scholar

11 This Journal, Vol. 38 (1944), pp. 407-33.

12 Hudson, Manley O., International Tribunals, Past and Future , Washington, 1944.Google Scholar