Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T20:39:38.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Territorial sea—delimitation of seaward boundary of State of UnitedStates—Convention on Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, 1958—non-applicability of international rule to domestic issue—the lawof the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans*
Affiliation:
Of the Board of Editors

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Act distinguished two bases for measuring a coastal State's seaward boundary: the “unconditional grant” of three miles from the natural coastline and the “conditional grant” of three leagues founded upon the historical claims of the Gulf States. State title to submerged lands was adjudicated in United States v. State of California, 332 U. S. 19 (1947), 42 A.J.I.L. 209 (1948); and United States v. State of California, 381 U. S. 139 (1965), 59 A.J.I.L. 930 (1965). The Supreme Court has held that only Texas and Florida are entitled on an historical basis to the three-league limit on the breadth of the territorial sea. United States v. States of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, 363 U. S. 1 (1960), 54 A.J.I.L. 895 (1960).

2 15 U. S. Treaties 1606; 516 U.N. Treaty Series 205; 52 A.J.I.L. 834 (1958).

3 389 U.S. 155 at 160-161.

4 Ibid. 177.